July 29th, 2008 at 7:57 am
I must say I have not read it

WARNING
May contain high level of libel

http://www.theherald.co.uk/mostpopular.var.2411609.mostviewed.do_you_want_to
_________
You haven’t read it, Jo? May I make a helpful suggestion - you and all the others of your ilk should read it daily - morning, noon and night!

July 29th, 2008 at 6:34 am
VQ! VQ! VQ! I know what you mean! I got the willies when I read that! Straight out of a Hollywood movie!

I know which Dolly’s gonna use that line!

DuncanR ——- Gonna have to discuss that one with JO! The thing is - if the real thing are good enough for the Oprah show - and I can make the dolls life-like with soundy-likey voices - the US will love them!

They like my kinda humour over there. I think it’s just that Cheryl doesn’t like me because I’m not well!

___________
You character, of course I like you, Coco, I sit over here in fits of laughter reading what you write at times!

No, no one said they were, but if you are defending peoples finer feelings why not the antis as well? the word Mccannland was developed as a direct reply to Anorakland which was submitted by someone as an insult. Sauce for the goose? as well as the gander

Ok we shall start again, when we say stop we mean stop, not debate , stop. Especially over identities.

—————————————————————————————-

As I said, I didn’t know that it was wrong to try and guess who the new mod was. Had I been even given a hint earlier I wouldn’t have persued it. I didn’t see JJ’s remark until I had posted the second last comment.

I don’t have a problem with defending the feelings of so called antis. I don’t see them as monsters, just people whose views are different to mine and I respect that. In the real world, lets face it what makes an evening interesting is a good lively debate among friends. We don’t throw eggs at each other on the way home.

At any rate we have both said our piece and I resect your decision as moderator as I am sure you respect my right to defend myself.

“M and A said

“Elena, challenges regarding who people are, not their views. When we intervene we expect the offender to stop

Incidentally Anoraklanders are frequently made to feel unwelcome, particularly when called windylickers.”

—————————————————————————————–

My challenge was to do with a definition.

Yes, I did ask a number of times if a certain person was the new mod, but in my defence I did not get a straight answer and I did not know I wasn’t supposed to ask.I do now and I am sorry for asking .However, at the time I asked the mod on duty if I was barking up the wrong tree and I asked the individual to tell me to mind my own beeswax on the mod issue if I was annoying her. To my mind if Iwas out of line, that was the time to say “Elena stop, this isn’t allowed.”

Yes my second last post came after M&A intervention, but that was only because I had not pushed the refresh button prior to posting my comment which was mainly to do with a definition and a defence against an unfair accusation by the other poster.I did not see the M&A comment.I would not have posted had I done so. . Again there was no disrespect intended and Iam sorry if that was the way it came across.

My last post was a defence . Again, since it addressed the mod on duty and not the poster in question I did not think it would be disallowed.

However what I really object to are the inferences that I attack or bully. I don’t. I may be tenacious in issues when I feel I am right but I also will be the first to hold up my hands and say okay you win, if another argument is more plausible. but I am not a bully, I don’t attack.I have never disparaged another poster’s stance or view with ad hominem remarks. I have never inferred that a poster was stupid,ignorant , awkward,neglectful suffering from bouts of hysteria and etc. because of their views. To my mind these are attacks and using them is bullying.

These are just my views.I am not a moderator and I understand that I do not have the last word . However I do like to clear the air. Please do not see this as a criticism in general. I am referring to specifics here and there is no disrespect intended.

Incidently the last two terms are not mine.

M and A

No, no one said they were, but if you are defending peoples finer feelings why not the antis as well? the word Mccannland was developed as a direct reply to Anorakland which was submitted by someone as an insult. Sauce for the goose? as well as the gander

Ok we shall start again, when we say stop we mean stop, not debate , stop. Especially over identities.

Jo on its way
******
One of these days,I”ll turn up at your front door ya will see! I”ll come with some fags for your 2 yrs old as well.Booze for Mm & Dad ,a supply of dry sardines and fresh stuffed prawns and obviously,a whole range of Coco”s dollies

Matt
I am impatient to have my patience tested.
***
Be patient

Mucho gracias !!

Perfecto.

I am impatient to have my patience tested.

Bet she does.

July 29th, 2008 at 8:03 am
jo Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 7:57 am

Another medical connection
******
Old university lost friends
How is your patience today?Top level?

Morning, brandon.

Much too early for eating for me.

A nice cuppa would be enough.

Fuller breakfast by 9 am sharp.

from jos post above

————————————————————-

What fucking part do these stupid people not get?

Its like comparing I let my 10 year old sleep with her boyfriend, dont blame me I know some parents who let their 16 year olds sleep with boys too !

I know of one mother who let her 14 year old have a slow dance and a snog!

Dont witch hunt me, we all make mistakes!

FFS

Another medical connection.