
Madeleine McCann: Colette Douglas Home Spreads The Fear And Inside Irvine Welsh
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann, Gerry McCann
THE HERALD: “Do you want to see every parent in the dock?”
It’s Colette Douglas Home, professional Maddie opinion giver. And to answer her question: yes. Fingerprint them, photograph them and question them for 42 days. Only the guilty have anything to fear.
Fear:
You’ve got to admit, they shouldn’t have left the children unattended and gone out to dinner.” It was a colleague talking to me about Kate and Gerry McCann. He went on: “We go on holiday with a big group of friends but we’d never do that. We put the wee ones to bed and eat downstairs.”
“And do you check on them every half hour?”
“Yes. Well, we send the teenagers to do the checking.”
Fear:
I wonder if he realises how fortunate he has been. If something terrible had happened, can you imagine the headlines? They would probably say something like: “Teenagers checked on missing toddler while parents partied.”
Yeah, who cares that the children have been eaten by alligators, fallen down the plughole or hit the minibar and suffocated in their own vomit – it’s the media’s reaction to it that matters most.
And what of the McCanns, Colette’s favourite subject:
I imagined the fact that Kate and Gerry McCann are doctors would stand them in some regard, since they spend their lives trying to help others. I was wrong. I thought the clear evidence from family photographs that Madeleine was a happy, well-cared-for child would demonstrate that leaving her unsupervised was an aberration, not the norm. But I didn’t allow for jealousy and resentment.
Maybe people are just bored of the McCanns? But Colette cannot face that possibility:
So let’s think about that call for prosecution. If the McCanns are to stand in the dock, who should stand beside them? We can start with those who were on the same holiday and who didn’t hire a babysitter. Then what about all the other couples who have stayed at that or any family-friendly holiday village where they felt safe enough to leave the children unattended while they ate? What about people who eat in the garden on hot summer evenings while their children sleep in the house? What about parents who sleep indoors, maybe one night a year, while their kids sleep in a tent? If we apply these standards, the courts would be jam-packed.
What about them? The McCanns are not being prosecuted child neglect, child abandonment, nor for any other crime.
THE SCOTSMAN: “Crime and Punishment - Irvine Welsh”
Dave Robinson is in Saughton jail. For crimes againt journalism. Ho-ho:
I’M WALKING behind the Famous Author. He’s wearing trainers, a T-shirt, an expensive-looking grey-green leather jacket and is carrying a plastic bag. As I follow him, I’m thinking that the way people walk tells you something about them. The Famous Author walks like a fighter: self-confident, disciplined, head up. He doesn’t walk like a 50-year-old, though in a couple of months he will be one.
How close behind Welsh is Robinson? Close enough to smell him?
Welsh has written a book called Crime, HMP Edinburgh. But he nearly didn’t:
He’s talked to child-abuse survivors’ groups and handles the subject with uncommon sensitivity – so much so, in fact, that he gave up writing the book altogether when the Madeleine McCann story first broke. “Even approaching the subject tangentially seemed frivolous and stupid.”
His is work of fiction, the McCann case is one of fact. What has one to do with the other? The McCann case is a touchstone for a writer’s book, a stepping stone on the PR drive.
Posted: 29th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (494) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Oh my god theres a fire down the road an old church now flats! shit!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:02 am
The more they sue the more obvious their intentions are!
Greed will be their downfall, mark my words!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:02 am
wtf Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:58 am
morning all
The odious two just get more vile in my eyes every day
*******
Why is that? They are doing absolutely everything in their POWER to find Madeleine,aint they?
July 29th, 2008 at 9:01 am
jo Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:59 am
They have got to spin something.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:59 am
Matt
Too eager for the truth,Matt.Good & not good,very risky but we must understand where these people come from
I believe he has some sort of support but still…..
Amaral & his book.
He would have never published it if he had NOT been given the “go”
It is “them” who have provocked the uproar because they are scared,they need to hide even more than ever and this has become a tiring “game”
But the ONLY loser here is Madeleine who seems to be forgotten more and more
July 29th, 2008 at 8:58 am
morning all
The odious two just get more vile in my eyes every day
July 29th, 2008 at 8:56 am
liza Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:46 am
It’s called intimidation……and I for one cock a snoot at their threats..
July 29th, 2008 at 8:54 am
The Expresso article is the first one currently in Latest News in the mccannfiles.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:54 am
He wants to have you for breakfast
July 29th, 2008 at 8:54 am
# liza Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:46 am
I wonder how spending donated money on means to deal with blogs/forums/libel etc is going to search for the child?? Or are the pro’s going to say that it’s a way to raise even more money? Isn’t every day of essence? So why not concentrate on finding the child? No, let’s first concentrate on how to punish those evil bloggers who have the audicity to translate Portuguese articles into English then we’ll get down to business and look for our daughter
Honestly, I can’t understand these people - I’ve got 3 kids myself and really, I just can’t believe them….
———————————
Yes considering they expect she is with a pack of paedophiles, they dont mind her daily torture do they?
Money for us and the twins and our future first, madeleine ………………
July 29th, 2008 at 8:53 am
Gimme a hint why is my question to agw in moderation ?
This one?
Are we unable now to ask a CIVIL question and expect a CIVIL answer agw, if you haven’t read the link which has nothing to do with the book except the parts Amaral may have chosen to use, why be so defensive, are you afraid that Anorak would be open to action if you allowed it. If so fine, but don’t lecture me about nothing, because you got out of the wrong side of bed, it is the internet not mastermind,just as well !
Administrator: Ask as many questions as you like. Do not expect a civil reply to a deliberate attempt to force an unenforceable issue. Wrong side of the bed ?. ..Mewl elsewhere kitten, I’m a cynic all day every day and your attitude is getting close to being beneath my contempt.
Since whichever version of Gandolf you are today appears to be actioning a deliberately moronic mode, I repeat, yet again, my earlier comment. Do me the honour of reading it very carefully and not the apparent cursoriness shown so far.
Administrator: Assume nothing that’s the better policy. I cannot comment on the content since I have not read it. The difficulty is the book is a version of events which may not agree with the officially expressed view. I have not spoken to the Moderator involved in sidelining the posting you mention but I would tend to agree with the decision. I agree since you appear to have put it up as a deliberate challenge and meant to provoke a response. I do not regard such action as either relevant, showing a single thread of humour or worthy of your seemingly multiple personna, style and viewpoints. I also regard the query here as mendacious. So sue me!! -agw
July 29th, 2008 at 8:52 am
jo Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:39 am
The more they try to disturb the hive….the more bees rush out to sting them.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:50 am
I wonder if Mr Monteiro will be called to book for publishing the PJ files leak
…before the Secrecy had ended ?
Sounds an illegal thing to do.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:50 am
Carmen
The only thing I know is how to satnd up for my rightS and help others to do the same
Whats happening with “them” is simply outrageous but be reassured that “some” also have “sophisticated tools”.We wont have it nor let it happen
The main focus is justice for Madeleine and “they” wont let it happen
Very bad news
July 29th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Jo says
(earlier this morning) - How is Sweet Duncan” today
++++++++++++++++++++
Hi Jo, was traveling to work when you posted earlier. I’m fine. Hope you are too. Have to log off now though and do some proper work.
Have a a good day!
Duncan
July 29th, 2008 at 8:48 am
jo Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:39 am
That I know….am sure that he will expose them even more in Court.
But I wasn’t referring to that…more to the ones in Rapture presently.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:47 am
Are we unable now to ask a CIVIL question and expect a CIVIL answer agw, if you haven’t read the link which has nothing to do with the book except the parts Amaral may have chosen to use, why be so defensive, are you afraid that Anorak would be open to action if you allowed it. If so fine, but don’t lecture me about nothing, because you got out of the wrong side of bed, it is the internet not mastermind,just as well !
Administrator: Ask as many questions as you like. Do not expect a civil reply to a deliberate attempt to force an unenforceable issue. Wrong side of the bed ?. ..Mewl elsewhere kitten, I’m a cynic all day every day and your attitude is getting close to being beneath my contempt.
Since whichever version of Gandolf you are today appears to be actioning a deliberately moronic mode, I repeat, yet again, my earlier comment. Do me the honour of reading it very carefully and not the apparent cursoriness shown so far.
Administrator: Assume nothing that’s the better policy. I cannot comment on the content since I have not read it. The difficulty is the book is a version of events which may not agree with the officially expressed view. I have not spoken to the Moderator involved in sidelining the posting you mention but I would tend to agree with the decision. I agree since you appear to have put it up as a deliberate challenge and meant to provoke a response. I do not regard such action as either relevant, showing a single thread of humour or worthy of your seemingly multiple personna, style and viewpoints. I also regard the query here as mendacious. So sue me!! -agw
July 29th, 2008 at 8:47 am
Remember not to leave that stepping stone unturned, mr Journo…
I like the way that, thanks to the inter-bob that certain aspects of this case just won’t go away, and despite all efforts, ostensibly…
July 29th, 2008 at 8:46 am
I wonder how spending donated money on means to deal with blogs/forums/libel etc is going to search for the child?? Or are the pro’s going to say that it’s a way to raise even more money? Isn’t every day of essence? So why not concentrate on finding the child? No, let’s first concentrate on how to punish those evil bloggers who have the audicity to translate Portuguese articles into English then we’ll get down to business and look for our daughter
Honestly, I can’t understand these people - I’ve got 3 kids myself and really, I just can’t believe them….
July 29th, 2008 at 8:43 am
Gandolf
You can sue me as well…but I am telling you: I run much faster than you
July 29th, 2008 at 8:39 am
Matt
That should help protect Mr Amaral from any such attacks too.
****
I dont think he feels “attacked”,Matt
He said they were more than welcome to discuss the case IN court and it would be a portuguese court
I am increasingly concerned with our freedom of expression in the UK and english blogs and forums
This is NOT on at all.I know this is created to make a diversion from the real issue but still,it is very worrying
I do not live in the Uk nor am I a british citizen but what is happening in your country is unbelievable and you lot must get your act together.You will be supported,dont worry about this
July 29th, 2008 at 8:37 am
Gandolf
Have you got a translation of the Opinion article in yesterday’s Expresso? Written by the editor, Henrique Monteiro. (It’s not the one you gave the link for a little while ago. That was good as well though. Yes, the GNR was yet another group blasted by Amaral! But then….is anyone not blamed by the poor man? The GNR should feel annoyed if they weren’t included, along with the PJ, the British Govt, the Portuguese Govt, the PJ, the FSS, the NHS…..why the hell should the GNR escape!)
Anyway, the Expresso leader makes very interesting reading, and from a Portuguese point of view. I’d like an intelligible translation.
Maybe I should put it into “google translate” but the result isn’t very good, though better than babel fish! It’s clear that Monteiro is angry and ashamed at the image of Portuguese justice which Amaral is giving….”barbarism”…..”medieval justice, this idea of conviction without evidence” etc. etc.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:36 am
jo Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:31 am edit
Things have moved on since the last time there was a serious attempt to suppress free speech in Europe, Jo.
That nice Mr Berners - Lee gave us the internet.
Close one web page, another one opens. Even the Chinese gave in in the end.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:35 am
Any mcannylickers about ??
July 29th, 2008 at 8:34 am
Clarence makes me tremble…..with laughter.
July 29th, 2008 at 8:34 am
July 29th, 2008 at 8:33 am
Dont answer back!
July 29th, 2008 at 8:33 am
That is not the question I asked, are you by removing the anglicised link, somehow implying that the alleged report is unsafe or not genuine.
Administrator: Please persist.
I repeat:
Administrator: Assume nothing that’s the better policy. I cannot comment on the content since I have not read it. The difficulty is the book is a version of events which may not agree with the officially expressed view. I have not spoken to the Moderator involved in sidelining the posting you mention but I would tend to agree with the decision. I agree since you appear to have put it up as a deliberate challenge and meant to provoke a response. I do not regard such action as either relevant, showing a single thread of humour or worthy of your seemingly multiple personna, style and viewpoints. I also regard the query here as mendacious. So sue me!! -agw
July 29th, 2008 at 8:32 am
We shall not be silenced !!!
July 29th, 2008 at 8:32 am
“”"You can take it that mods and admin will be as alert and vigilant as ever.
Carmen”"”
As usual, good.
That should help protect Mr Amaral from any such attacks too.