
Madeleine McCann: Colette Douglas Home Spreads The Fear And Inside Irvine Welsh
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann, Gerry McCann
THE HERALD: “Do you want to see every parent in the dock?”
It’s Colette Douglas Home, professional Maddie opinion giver. And to answer her question: yes. Fingerprint them, photograph them and question them for 42 days. Only the guilty have anything to fear.
Fear:
You’ve got to admit, they shouldn’t have left the children unattended and gone out to dinner.” It was a colleague talking to me about Kate and Gerry McCann. He went on: “We go on holiday with a big group of friends but we’d never do that. We put the wee ones to bed and eat downstairs.”
“And do you check on them every half hour?”
“Yes. Well, we send the teenagers to do the checking.”
Fear:
I wonder if he realises how fortunate he has been. If something terrible had happened, can you imagine the headlines? They would probably say something like: “Teenagers checked on missing toddler while parents partied.”
Yeah, who cares that the children have been eaten by alligators, fallen down the plughole or hit the minibar and suffocated in their own vomit – it’s the media’s reaction to it that matters most.
And what of the McCanns, Colette’s favourite subject:
I imagined the fact that Kate and Gerry McCann are doctors would stand them in some regard, since they spend their lives trying to help others. I was wrong. I thought the clear evidence from family photographs that Madeleine was a happy, well-cared-for child would demonstrate that leaving her unsupervised was an aberration, not the norm. But I didn’t allow for jealousy and resentment.
Maybe people are just bored of the McCanns? But Colette cannot face that possibility:
So let’s think about that call for prosecution. If the McCanns are to stand in the dock, who should stand beside them? We can start with those who were on the same holiday and who didn’t hire a babysitter. Then what about all the other couples who have stayed at that or any family-friendly holiday village where they felt safe enough to leave the children unattended while they ate? What about people who eat in the garden on hot summer evenings while their children sleep in the house? What about parents who sleep indoors, maybe one night a year, while their kids sleep in a tent? If we apply these standards, the courts would be jam-packed.
What about them? The McCanns are not being prosecuted child neglect, child abandonment, nor for any other crime.
THE SCOTSMAN: “Crime and Punishment - Irvine Welsh”
Dave Robinson is in Saughton jail. For crimes againt journalism. Ho-ho:
I’M WALKING behind the Famous Author. He’s wearing trainers, a T-shirt, an expensive-looking grey-green leather jacket and is carrying a plastic bag. As I follow him, I’m thinking that the way people walk tells you something about them. The Famous Author walks like a fighter: self-confident, disciplined, head up. He doesn’t walk like a 50-year-old, though in a couple of months he will be one.
How close behind Welsh is Robinson? Close enough to smell him?
Welsh has written a book called Crime, HMP Edinburgh. But he nearly didn’t:
He’s talked to child-abuse survivors’ groups and handles the subject with uncommon sensitivity – so much so, in fact, that he gave up writing the book altogether when the Madeleine McCann story first broke. “Even approaching the subject tangentially seemed frivolous and stupid.”
His is work of fiction, the McCann case is one of fact. What has one to do with the other? The McCann case is a touchstone for a writer’s book, a stepping stone on the PR drive.
Posted: 29th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (494) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 29th, 2008 at 10:02 am
jo
Well said!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:59 am
Matt
But intimidators need to be shown that intimidation is not acceptable

****
They will
Even though I am sooooooooo scared of uncle clarrie
m&a
Why am I in mod?
M and A
Jo that allegation needs a better source, a newspaper not a blog
July 29th, 2008 at 9:50 am
Maria
on their way to LOOK for Madeleine
Nobody has found Madeleine have they? Parents aren’t likely to be jubilant when they’ve lost a child, wtf.
******
Thats right !!!! They look like that
http://bp0.blogger.com/_CRpxxLjKdvM/SIf2JVGmZhI/AAAAAAAAB8E/lr7TWqwd15g/s1600-h/PaisASorrir.jpg
July 29th, 2008 at 9:35 am
coolandcalm Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:33 am
I must remember not to take a Critic’s opinion re a book on face value ever
again.
Skimming is for stones across water. IMO
July 29th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Matt…. I’m a professional writer and reader. Skimming is good enough for me to get the jist! As for Amaral’s….. well!!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Carmen Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Did I ever suggest otherwise ?
But intimidators need to be shown that intimidation is not acceptable.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:28 am
maria
I think we have seen enough of them at press conferences and being interviewed where they didnt look as bad as they looked at that press conference. there have been enough pics of them smiling and laughing for goodness sake, and imo they have never behaved like the parents of a missisng child. Why do you defend them so much maria? Why get so annoyed when they are critisised? All very very odd, imo of course
July 29th, 2008 at 9:28 am
coolandcalm Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Hey you…wot’s this I read that you only skimmed through D C’s book.
You told me that you had read it and plugged it as a good read. )
July 29th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Her “Robert Murat has several questions to answer” was a hoot.
Considering she had refused to answer so many Police questions herself.
And Mr Murat…when first made Arguido…refused the presence of a lawyer and
answered all questions put to him by the Police.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Brandon F. ‘your’ fire has just been on a Sky Newsflash! it must be bad…… can you see it? we had one of those a few days ago. Several apartments over some shops were gutted after a barbeque was left smouldering on the roof terrace over night. Doh!
………………………………….
VQ…. if you’re out there… what is your problem with me saying I’m too busy to read Amarals book? some of us work for a living and also have a life!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Matt. Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:22 am edit
Carmen Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Of course…but you can cock a snoot at an intimidator without being libellous.
*************************
I’m an expert!!!!!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:24 am
wtf Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:19 am
jo
I was shocked when i seen their faces at the press release when their status had been lifted. Would have thought they would have done the tour of the sofas in jubilation
————————–
“Shocked”?? I don’t believe you.
Nobody has found Madeleine have they? Parents aren’t likely to be jubilant when they’ve lost a child, wtf.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Carmen Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Of course…but you can cock a snoot at an intimidator without being libellous.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Matt. Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:56 am edit
liza Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 8:46 am
It’s called intimidation……and I for one cock a snoot at their threats..
************************
I understand the sentiment behind your remarks, but you must remember that wherever you are posting, you are requiring the owner of the site to cock a snoot at their threats too……
Our job is to protect Anorak so that he can live to see another day and another issue.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:20 am
I doubt if I would ever make it as a Dentist…I like hitting a nerve too much.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:19 am
jo
I was shocked when i seen their faces at the press release when their status had been lifted. Would have thought they would have done the tour of the sofas in jubilation. I agree with what you say, they know that the info and evidence is out there now in the public arena so to speak and they are panicking big time, imo.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:17 am
wtf Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
jo
they are using everything in their power to save their vile butts, imo. Why not just leave amarel be, if they are innocent and the charges have been dropped, why havnt we seen them being interviewed to put their side of the story across, like they said they wanted to once the status was lifted
************
Give up on that one,Wtf
Remember their long faces on the 21st of july
Not very “happy joy-joy” are they? I wonder why
Did they know that the files would not been handed over to their lawyers straight away?
Couldnt their lawyers do something about it?
To drown the fish,they are “focusing on Amarals book” and threatening people and their freedom of expression because this in their blind eyes is much more important than to LOOK for Madeleine which seems to be the LEAST of their preoccupation when they claimed that their arguidos status stopped them from doing it…..why dont THEY suggest a reconstruction now to the PJ?what do they have to fear if they are “cleared” from suspicions? or didnt they like the bit: “the case can be re opened at any time it is considered suitable in case of other evidence? evidence of……..?
They are leading a lost battle,primarily against their despiteful selves.They are going to lose it because they are very very UNintelligent people
July 29th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Maria Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Good morning Maria.
That gut feeling still affecting you ?
I would recommend a good Antacid.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Maria Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:06 am
“”"The money they got from the newspapers went straight into the Find
Madeleine Fund, not to K and G”"”.
We can’t be so sure that it did.
The figures don’t add up.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:11 am
wtf Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
They can also risk a day or two in Court with Mr Amaral.
Somehow I doubt if they will take that risk.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:09 am
liza Says:
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Their aim is that only their version of the “bible” is ever printed….or discussed.
Also known as suppression of the truth.
They are running very very scared.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:08 am
Maria
I was talking about time and effort not money!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:08 am
Maria
Chewing bricks again?
July 29th, 2008 at 9:07 am
Matt
Should have been in PDL by now….searching.
—————————————————–
Please do try to grow up!
July 29th, 2008 at 9:06 am
BF
What makes you think they could possibly spend the Find Madeleine Fund on legal costs?
The Directors made it clear last year that the Fund would NOT be used for legal costs.
(Those wealthy backers who donate specifically to help them pay their legal costs are entitled to do as they wish with their money.)
The money they got from the newspapers went straight into the Find Madeleine Fund, not to K and G.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:05 am
Almost a week since being freed from the “shackles” of Arguidoship, which
was supposed, according to Dr K, to be having a detrimental affect on the search.
Should have been in PDL by now….searching.
July 29th, 2008 at 9:04 am
“Maybe people are just bored of the McCanns? But Colette cannot face that possibility”
They ended up by boring their very own selves
Colette cant face her own boredom and empty life
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
jo
they are using everything in their power to save their vile butts, imo. Why not just leave amarel be, if they are innocent and the charges have been dropped, why havnt we seen them being interviewed to put their side of the story across, like they said they wanted to once the status was lifted
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Mods and Adm,
good morning,
is it forbiden to tell here what the media in Portugal are saying?
Administrator: It depends what they are saying. If YOU can not PROVE what they are printing is true then do not repeat it. -agw
July 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Matt - sure, it’s intimidation - but surely, the fact that this appears to be their first concern is rather suggestive, isn’t it? It means that defending themselves against evil bloggers is more important than searching for Madeleine (or else and in my most humble opinion, they know searching is useless….)