<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: The Attack Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-354509</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-354509</guid>
		<description>Ok, someone is playing tricks with posts and times.
I give up and going to my well deserved rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, someone is playing tricks with posts and times.<br />
I give up and going to my well deserved rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-354497</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 01:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-354497</guid>
		<description>Am I hacullinating or have whole day's posts disappeared?
Good thing I have them all safe in my cache.
9-27 a.m. on July 31 to 1:31 a.m. on August 1.

Could it really be because I accused Ade, satirically, of being the British musician?

________________________
m&amp;a
either it's a mind fuck or a McVirus
-meercat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I hacullinating or have whole day&#8217;s posts disappeared?<br />
Good thing I have them all safe in my cache.<br />
9-27 a.m. on July 31 to 1:31 a.m. on August 1.</p>
<p>Could it really be because I accused Ade, satirically, of being the British musician?</p>
<p>________________________<br />
m&#038;a<br />
either it&#8217;s a mind fuck or a McVirus<br />
-meercat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veritablequandary</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-354461</link>
		<dc:creator>veritablequandary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-354461</guid>
		<description>Is there a gap between July 31 at 9:27 a.m and July 31 at 10:25 p.m.?
I just hit refresh "all?
 
JuneJohnson Says: 

July 31st, 2008 at 9:27 am 
Once the files are in the public arena, the book will be translated

 Muddler She Wrote Says: 

July 31st, 2008 at 10:25 pm 
and when all the forums are closed and all the bloggers sit shivering shirtless in the wind, the questions they fear the most will come: from the mouths of babes, for children need no licence to speak; from the memories that will play over and over and over and over again in their heads; from the strange noises in the day and the stranger noises at night; from the voices they’ll hear while no one’s there. run, run, run but you cannot hide.

well, that’s what i was told as a child anyway. scary stuff, innit? but at least it gives me one more reason to try to tell the truth and if i blunder to at least face up to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a gap between July 31 at 9:27 a.m and July 31 at 10:25 p.m.?<br />
I just hit refresh &#8220;all?</p>
<p>JuneJohnson Says: </p>
<p>July 31st, 2008 at 9:27 am<br />
Once the files are in the public arena, the book will be translated</p>
<p> Muddler She Wrote Says: </p>
<p>July 31st, 2008 at 10:25 pm<br />
and when all the forums are closed and all the bloggers sit shivering shirtless in the wind, the questions they fear the most will come: from the mouths of babes, for children need no licence to speak; from the memories that will play over and over and over and over again in their heads; from the strange noises in the day and the stranger noises at night; from the voices they’ll hear while no one’s there. run, run, run but you cannot hide.</p>
<p>well, that’s what i was told as a child anyway. scary stuff, innit? but at least it gives me one more reason to try to tell the truth and if i blunder to at least face up to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muddler She Wrote</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-354397</link>
		<dc:creator>Muddler She Wrote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-354397</guid>
		<description>and when all the forums are closed and all the bloggers sit shivering shirtless in the wind, the questions they fear the most will come: from the mouths of babes, for children need no licence to speak; from the memories that will play over and over and over and over again in their heads; from the strange noises in the day and the stranger noises at night; from the voices they'll hear while no one's there. run, run, run but you cannot hide.

well, that's what i was told as a child anyway. scary stuff, innit? but at least it gives me one more reason to try to tell the truth and if i blunder to at least face up to it.

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and when all the forums are closed and all the bloggers sit shivering shirtless in the wind, the questions they fear the most will come: from the mouths of babes, for children need no licence to speak; from the memories that will play over and over and over and over again in their heads; from the strange noises in the day and the stranger noises at night; from the voices they&#8217;ll hear while no one&#8217;s there. run, run, run but you cannot hide.</p>
<p>well, that&#8217;s what i was told as a child anyway. scary stuff, innit? but at least it gives me one more reason to try to tell the truth and if i blunder to at least face up to it.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuneJohnson</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353842</link>
		<dc:creator>JuneJohnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353842</guid>
		<description>Once the files are in the public arena, the book will be translated</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once the files are in the public arena, the book will be translated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovemedo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353836</link>
		<dc:creator>lovemedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353836</guid>
		<description>the truth will out. 
call me naive, but I still believe in it.

whatever they do, whomever they sue, they can't avoid that. 
science will improve. evidence will be proven correct. 

what about the freedom of information? of course I have the right to know the book! they may be able to place a ban on this book in the UK. but it will be translated anyway. 

we don't fear you, mr. pink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the truth will out.<br />
call me naive, but I still believe in it.</p>
<p>whatever they do, whomever they sue, they can&#8217;t avoid that.<br />
science will improve. evidence will be proven correct. </p>
<p>what about the freedom of information? of course I have the right to know the book! they may be able to place a ban on this book in the UK. but it will be translated anyway. </p>
<p>we don&#8217;t fear you, mr. pink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353803</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353803</guid>
		<description>remains have been found in jersey
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7534350.stm

good morning :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remains have been found in jersey<br />
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7534350.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7534350.stm</a></p>
<p>good morning <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353802</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353802</guid>
		<description>Cheryl Says: 
July 31st, 2008 at 6:55 am   edit

 If they don’t cling to that belief, then they are forced to accept within themselves the most horrible of all nightmares - their daughter is not alive by that one irresponsible action - they were not there to protect her.

*********************

Surely the most 'horrible of nightmares' was not their nightmare, but that of their daughter; especially on finding that they were not there to protect her by one 'irresponsible action' but by a string of them, a recurring pattern, even after she had pointed out how much distress it was causing her. 

How terrible for a child, to ask a parent for help and find that none was forthcoming - the ultimate betrayal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl Says:<br />
July 31st, 2008 at 6:55 am   edit</p>
<p> If they don’t cling to that belief, then they are forced to accept within themselves the most horrible of all nightmares - their daughter is not alive by that one irresponsible action - they were not there to protect her.</p>
<p>*********************</p>
<p>Surely the most &#8216;horrible of nightmares&#8217; was not their nightmare, but that of their daughter; especially on finding that they were not there to protect her by one &#8216;irresponsible action&#8217; but by a string of them, a recurring pattern, even after she had pointed out how much distress it was causing her. </p>
<p>How terrible for a child, to ask a parent for help and find that none was forthcoming - the ultimate betrayal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353801</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353801</guid>
		<description>AGW, I just read what you wrote and quite thoughtful of you to see how that you did.  As you know, I went through this with my very dearest friends years ago, godparents to one of my children.  So, may I give you thoughts of what they are going through and why from what I went through with them and saw them go through as the parents who daughter disappeared from their house after school before they arrived home from work.  She, by the way, was old enough under the law to go home alone after school.  Neither one ever accepted she would not be found some day.  The mother became mentally unstable and stayed unstable, the father died an early death from the grief and strain.  They had no closure, AGW, her remains were never found to force them to accept that she  was dead.     Now they were not responsible at all in any way for their daughter's disappearance so they had no 'guilt driven' denial that she was most likely dead.  

My heart does hurt for the McCanns, as I am a mother and can only shudder to think what it would do to me to lose my child that way.  They know because of that very irresponsible action, though not done with malice of forethought, they are responsible  for their much loved daughter's disappearance.  Their grief is only compounded!  They have the living hell of their daughter being missing, a grief that one can only imagine who has not been through it, and they desperately want to believe she is alive out there somewhere.  If they don't cling to that belief, then they are forced to accept within themselves  the most horrible of all nightmares -  their daughter is not alive by that one irresponsible action - they were not there to protect her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGW, I just read what you wrote and quite thoughtful of you to see how that you did.  As you know, I went through this with my very dearest friends years ago, godparents to one of my children.  So, may I give you thoughts of what they are going through and why from what I went through with them and saw them go through as the parents who daughter disappeared from their house after school before they arrived home from work.  She, by the way, was old enough under the law to go home alone after school.  Neither one ever accepted she would not be found some day.  The mother became mentally unstable and stayed unstable, the father died an early death from the grief and strain.  They had no closure, AGW, her remains were never found to force them to accept that she  was dead.     Now they were not responsible at all in any way for their daughter&#8217;s disappearance so they had no &#8216;guilt driven&#8217; denial that she was most likely dead.  </p>
<p>My heart does hurt for the McCanns, as I am a mother and can only shudder to think what it would do to me to lose my child that way.  They know because of that very irresponsible action, though not done with malice of forethought, they are responsible  for their much loved daughter&#8217;s disappearance.  Their grief is only compounded!  They have the living hell of their daughter being missing, a grief that one can only imagine who has not been through it, and they desperately want to believe she is alive out there somewhere.  If they don&#8217;t cling to that belief, then they are forced to accept within themselves  the most horrible of all nightmares -  their daughter is not alive by that one irresponsible action - they were not there to protect her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agw</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353800</link>
		<dc:creator>agw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353800</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gandolf &lt;/strong&gt;had attempted to publish a  report from a  Portuguese media outlet which speculated on alleged difference between a book and supposedly leaked police reports.
Despite the fact the risks were self-evident there was a suspicious insistence to refer to the articles.
On many separate occasions he/she/they challenged the Moderators and eventually me after I had given a ruling. He then attempted to publish this. Fair enough. If you wish to take on me then the gloves are off and my view is below.
The Moderators remain the Guardians of the site and their decisions are final. Only a cretin would challenge them, the editor or me. We are passionate about free speech. That viewpoint neither gives you the right to abuse it nor will we allow you the opportunity to demonstrate your discourtesy by insult or abuse to us. The others here do not deserve it and I don't give a a gnat's life expectancy in an insect killer for your opinion of me.

&lt;strong&gt;Gandolf's&lt;/strong&gt;  latest (and now released)  was:
Garbage or not agw, it is as requested from a legitimate news source, if we are only to post officially verified statements that is a different matter and somewhat narrows the target area. The obvious question is .....was the report leaked or was it made available to certain parties, you may have noticed that the Portuguese authorities have made no comment on the alleged leak, call me cynical, but I am willing to bet a Ruby to a grain of sand that no one will be looked for or charged over this media claimed leak.

M&amp;A
Artemis
Unless and until the reports are officially released you are relying on conjecture and that is not acceptable given the nature of the material.

&lt;strong&gt;Administrator&lt;/strong&gt;: Two things. Anorak may very well be looked at and charged because of your recklessness and stupidity...because that's what your attitude is. A news source not bound by the constraints of British laws can do as it pleases. You, and we, may not.
Secondly: I keep repeating I have no opinion in this case. That is not exactly true. If we are to presume an innocence for the parents of the missing child then at least get off your moral high horse and give the  policeman Amaral the same presumption. Whatever the charges he now faces and their outcome, he has the same right to be presumed innocent, until proved otherwise...and he was the investigating officer-in-charge of a case which still has no answers and no recovered child. 
The child remains missing and I regret to point out only a grieving parent or a crystal ball gazer can truly believe the child is still alive. No policeman in the world would tell you otherwise. Private investigation companies are a different matter and will possibly give a different opinion. Well they would wouldn't they?
I would suggest you stop idle and nonsensical speculation and concentrate on the failures evident in this case. Those failures have nothing to do with guilt or innocence but I will say this: the first and primary cause of this was the parents' urge to spend time with adult friends and not in the guardianship role of mother or father. The original opportunity to commit a crime (if there was one) a fault and/or sin was not created by the obvious original police errors and or failures. As always, the investigating teams come in to try and sort out the truths. They have no reason or justification to do any other. 

Ask yourself this: If there is ANY guilt here, where does it lie? Police, alleged abductor(s), fiends or friends, media, the Pope, the British government and its consular service or parents? 
There can be no crime without motive and opportunity. 

We have no answers for you. No facts. I have strong beliefs but will keep my opinions to myself...other than one I expressed months ago. Whatever else we are looking at,  it is a family utterly destroyed and in shards. It will never recover from this. The tragedy will never go away. The fingers will never stop pointing and I can not imagine the horrors and chance accusative confrontations  which still  lie ahead for Kate Healy and Gerald McCann. Together or apart.&lt;strong&gt;-agw&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gandolf </strong>had attempted to publish a  report from a  Portuguese media outlet which speculated on alleged difference between a book and supposedly leaked police reports.<br />
Despite the fact the risks were self-evident there was a suspicious insistence to refer to the articles.<br />
On many separate occasions he/she/they challenged the Moderators and eventually me after I had given a ruling. He then attempted to publish this. Fair enough. If you wish to take on me then the gloves are off and my view is below.<br />
The Moderators remain the Guardians of the site and their decisions are final. Only a cretin would challenge them, the editor or me. We are passionate about free speech. That viewpoint neither gives you the right to abuse it nor will we allow you the opportunity to demonstrate your discourtesy by insult or abuse to us. The others here do not deserve it and I don&#8217;t give a a gnat&#8217;s life expectancy in an insect killer for your opinion of me.</p>
<p><strong>Gandolf&#8217;s</strong>  latest (and now released)  was:<br />
Garbage or not agw, it is as requested from a legitimate news source, if we are only to post officially verified statements that is a different matter and somewhat narrows the target area. The obvious question is &#8230;..was the report leaked or was it made available to certain parties, you may have noticed that the Portuguese authorities have made no comment on the alleged leak, call me cynical, but I am willing to bet a Ruby to a grain of sand that no one will be looked for or charged over this media claimed leak.</p>
<p>M&#038;A<br />
Artemis<br />
Unless and until the reports are officially released you are relying on conjecture and that is not acceptable given the nature of the material.</p>
<p><strong>Administrator</strong>: Two things. Anorak may very well be looked at and charged because of your recklessness and stupidity&#8230;because that&#8217;s what your attitude is. A news source not bound by the constraints of British laws can do as it pleases. You, and we, may not.<br />
Secondly: I keep repeating I have no opinion in this case. That is not exactly true. If we are to presume an innocence for the parents of the missing child then at least get off your moral high horse and give the  policeman Amaral the same presumption. Whatever the charges he now faces and their outcome, he has the same right to be presumed innocent, until proved otherwise&#8230;and he was the investigating officer-in-charge of a case which still has no answers and no recovered child.<br />
The child remains missing and I regret to point out only a grieving parent or a crystal ball gazer can truly believe the child is still alive. No policeman in the world would tell you otherwise. Private investigation companies are a different matter and will possibly give a different opinion. Well they would wouldn&#8217;t they?<br />
I would suggest you stop idle and nonsensical speculation and concentrate on the failures evident in this case. Those failures have nothing to do with guilt or innocence but I will say this: the first and primary cause of this was the parents&#8217; urge to spend time with adult friends and not in the guardianship role of mother or father. The original opportunity to commit a crime (if there was one) a fault and/or sin was not created by the obvious original police errors and or failures. As always, the investigating teams come in to try and sort out the truths. They have no reason or justification to do any other. </p>
<p>Ask yourself this: If there is ANY guilt here, where does it lie? Police, alleged abductor(s), fiends or friends, media, the Pope, the British government and its consular service or parents?<br />
There can be no crime without motive and opportunity. </p>
<p>We have no answers for you. No facts. I have strong beliefs but will keep my opinions to myself&#8230;other than one I expressed months ago. Whatever else we are looking at,  it is a family utterly destroyed and in shards. It will never recover from this. The tragedy will never go away. The fingers will never stop pointing and I can not imagine the horrors and chance accusative confrontations  which still  lie ahead for Kate Healy and Gerald McCann. Together or apart.<strong>-agw</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meercat</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353796</link>
		<dc:creator>meercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353796</guid>
		<description>Dr Watson, I'd like to hear from Sherlock on that one.
Do nuns usually spend their time on internet blogs?
That's a bad habit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Watson, I&#8217;d like to hear from Sherlock on that one.<br />
Do nuns usually spend their time on internet blogs?<br />
That&#8217;s a bad habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353795</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353795</guid>
		<description>Dr. Watson Says: 

July 31st, 2008 at 2:35 am 
As an anti-, I can confirm that Maria is the nicest of all pro-s.
I would love her opinion to be right, but, alas, there was no abduction.

_______
What was it then?  No UFOs were seen  no fairy's waving magic wands, the police have said no evidence found involving the parents or Murat and the parents and Murat had their status lifted....where did she disappear to; how did she disappear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Watson Says: </p>
<p>July 31st, 2008 at 2:35 am<br />
As an anti-, I can confirm that Maria is the nicest of all pro-s.<br />
I would love her opinion to be right, but, alas, there was no abduction.</p>
<p>_______<br />
What was it then?  No UFOs were seen  no fairy&#8217;s waving magic wands, the police have said no evidence found involving the parents or Murat and the parents and Murat had their status lifted&#8230;.where did she disappear to; how did she disappear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353791</guid>
		<description>As an anti-, I can confirm that Maria is the nicest of all pro-s.
I would love her opinion to be right, but, alas, there was no abduction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an anti-, I can confirm that Maria is the nicest of all pro-s.<br />
I would love her opinion to be right, but, alas, there was no abduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353790</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353790</guid>
		<description>Maravilha Says: 

July 31st, 2008 at 2:18 am 
_________
That has been the talk on here for over 8 months re Maria being a Nun.  Is she?  I don't know but she is a lovely person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maravilha Says: </p>
<p>July 31st, 2008 at 2:18 am<br />
_________<br />
That has been the talk on here for over 8 months re Maria being a Nun.  Is she?  I don&#8217;t know but she is a lovely person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maravilha</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353788</link>
		<dc:creator>Maravilha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353788</guid>
		<description>I can not believ Maria is a nun.

Is she really?

# How doy ou solve a problem like Maria?#

#How do you hold a moonlight in your hands!....#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can not believ Maria is a nun.</p>
<p>Is she really?</p>
<p># How doy ou solve a problem like Maria?#</p>
<p>#How do you hold a moonlight in your hands!&#8230;.#</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grande Finale</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353786</link>
		<dc:creator>Grande Finale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353786</guid>
		<description>JuneJohnson Says: 

July 30th, 2008 at 10:44 pm 
Talking of keys, we went out for a meal a while back, but went by cab, in order to be able to drink. Locked up and put the keys in my handbag, (normally put them in the cars ashtray)

Anyway, enjoyed our evening, got back home, could I find my keys? could I hell! Rang my neighbour, we are each others keyholders, the next day got Bob’s set cut for me….
Last week in the hairdresser, was putting something in the tiny compartment of the same bag….and found my keys…..
**************************
May I suggest you just leave the door open ? saves waking kids up when you put the keys in the lock ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JuneJohnson Says: </p>
<p>July 30th, 2008 at 10:44 pm<br />
Talking of keys, we went out for a meal a while back, but went by cab, in order to be able to drink. Locked up and put the keys in my handbag, (normally put them in the cars ashtray)</p>
<p>Anyway, enjoyed our evening, got back home, could I find my keys? could I hell! Rang my neighbour, we are each others keyholders, the next day got Bob’s set cut for me….<br />
Last week in the hairdresser, was putting something in the tiny compartment of the same bag….and found my keys…..<br />
**************************<br />
May I suggest you just leave the door open ? saves waking kids up when you put the keys in the lock ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzi</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353785</link>
		<dc:creator>suzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353785</guid>
		<description>Since when was it an offence to state an opinion?   I can see before long I will be having to phone Rothley to check if I can pass wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when was it an offence to state an opinion?   I can see before long I will be having to phone Rothley to check if I can pass wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meercat</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353784</link>
		<dc:creator>meercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353784</guid>
		<description>Not according to the chuch it aint!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not according to the chuch it aint!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mic</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353783</link>
		<dc:creator>Mic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353783</guid>
		<description>What's in my anus is my own business. and it aint no Disney cartoon dog, that's for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s in my anus is my own business. and it aint no Disney cartoon dog, that&#8217;s for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/186793/twitterings/madeleine-mccann-the-attack-blogs.html/comment-page-8#comment-353782</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186793#comment-353782</guid>
		<description>Maria

I should hope you aren't a nun (I know 3 Sister Marias    :shock:       ) - or else I shall feel mortified about the the nasty/rude things I might have posted at you.    :oops:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maria</p>
<p>I should hope you aren&#8217;t a nun (I know 3 Sister Marias    <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' />       ) - or else I shall feel mortified about the the nasty/rude things I might have posted at you.    <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
