
Madeleine McCann: Bedroom Pictures, DNA And Kate McCann Questions
THE hacks are going over the police reports on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Are we looking for clues? Or are we just looking? Come one voyeur, come all:
A British scientist warned DNA tests on a sample from Kate and Gerry McCanns’ hire car were inconclusive just days before the couple were made suspects, official police files have revealed.
In an email dated September 3 2007 John Lowe, from the major incidents team at the Birmingham-based Forensic Science Service (FSS), said it was impossible to conclude whether the material came from their daughter Madeleine.
In an email dated September 3 2007 John Lowe, from the major incidents team at the Birmingham-based Forensic Science Service (FSS), said it was impossible to conclude whether the material definitely came from their daughter Madeleine.
Four days later Portuguese detectives named the McCanns “arguidos”, or formal suspects, in the child’s disappearance, citing DNA evidence as grounds for their suspicions.
Such are the sort of facts and opinions:
THE 48 QUESTIONS KATE DIDN’T ANSWER
1. On May 3 2007, around 22:00, when you entered the apartment, what did you see? What did you do? Where did you look? What did you touch?
2. Did you search inside the bedroom wardrobe? (she replied that she wouldn’t answer)
3. (shown 2 photographs of her bedroom wardrobe) Can you describe its contents?
4. Why had the curtain behind the sofa in front of the side window (whose photo was shown to her) been tampered with? Did somebody go behind that sofa?
5. How long did your search of the apartment take after you detected your daughter Madeleine’s disappearance?
6. Why did you say from the start that Madeleine had been abducted?
7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.
8. Why didn’t you ask the twins, at that moment, what had happened to their sister or why didn’t you ask them later on?
9. When you raised the alarm at the ‘Tapas’ what exactly did you say and what were your exact words?
10. What happened after you raised the alarm in the ‘Tapas’?
11. Why did you go and warn your friends instead of shouting from the verandah?
12. Who contacted the authorities?
13. Who took place in the searches?
14. Did anyone outside of the group learn of Madeleine’s disappearance in those following minutes?
15. Did any neighbour offer you help after the disappearance?
16. What does ‘we let her down’ mean?
17. Did Jane tell you that night that she’d seen a man with a child?
18. How were the authorities contacted and which police force was alerted?
19. During the searches, with the police already there, where did you search for Maddie, how and in what way?
20. Why did the twins not wake up during that search or when they were taken upstairs?
21. Who did you phone after the occurrence?
22. Did you call Sky News?
23. Did you know the danger of calling the media, because it could influence the abductor?
24. Did you ask for a priest?
25. By what means did you divulge Madeleine’s features, by photographs or by any other means?
26. Is it true that during the searches you remained seated on Maddie’s bed without moving?
27. What was your behaviour that night?
28. Did you manage to sleep?
29. Before travelling to Portugal did you make any comment about a foreboding or a bad feeling?
30. What was Madeleine’s behaviour like?
31. Did Maddie suffer from any illness or take any medication?
32. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister?
33. What was Madeleine’s relationship like with her brother and sister, friends and school mates?
34. As for your professional life, in how many and which hospitals have you worked?
35. What is your medical specialty?
36. Have you ever done shift work in any emergency services or other services?
37. Did you work every day?
38. At a certain point you stopped working, why?
39. Are the twins difficult to get to sleep? Are they restless and does that cause you uneasiness?
40. Is it true that sometimes you despaired with your children’s behaviour and that left you feeling very uneasy?
41. Is it true that in England you even considered handing over Madeleine’s custody to a relative?
42. In England, did you medicate your children? What type of medication?
43. In the case files you were SHOWN CANINE forensic testing films, where you can see them marking due to detection of the scent of human corpse and blood traces, also human, and only human, as well as all the comments of the technician in charge of them. After watching and after the marking of the scent of corpse in your bedroom beside the wardrobe and behind the sofa, pushed up against the sofa wall, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
44. When the sniffer dog also marked human blood behind the sofa, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
45. When the sniffer dog marked the scent of corpse coming from the vehicle you hired a month after the disappearance, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
46. When human blood was marked in the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
47. When confronted with the results of Maddie’s DNA, whose analysis was carried out in a British laboratory, collected from behind the sofa and the boot of the vehicle, did you say you couldn’t explain any more than you already had?
48. Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?
A QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER
Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?
A. ‘Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.’
Wanna see the pictures of the bedroom? What good can it do? What harm..?
Posted: 4th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (284) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





August 4th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Garthy, is this fantastically new thought-out theory going to take long? I need to go to bed and practice the birds and bees lesson that mommy taught me. C’mon, c’mon I’d like to go to bed in a good mood, giggling my way off to dreamland …….
August 4th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Hotandchoppy! ‘ Quite rightly.’ ‘Quite rightly.’! Are you for real?
I am never rude. Vulgar - yes! But never rude!
I explained to you before that I was dragged up by very wealthy and very poor people so I am doubly prone to swearing like a navvy or a Lord.
It’s a bastard - but I get by as best I can!
And I must confess I am older than eight years old!
I had better be - because I have had sex with several grown men! lol
And boy were they grown! LOL!
Get real Darling! X
August 4th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
chenier Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
————–
Oh ffs Chenny. They could have been stitching her up for she knew. Especially telling her about all this so called DNA as if it were true. Dont you think? I know i bleedin would.
You surprise me luvvy.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
julie
Ah. Strange no name. Even agw is a kinda name. Boss of Anorak would be good? Just calling yourself anorak is a bit confusing……well to me being a bear of very little brain! I think it’s nice when m&a give their name, it’s better to know who you’re talking to even in cyberspace!
August 4th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Julie Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Garth Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Jezuz wept, where did she come from?
________________________
Well if my mommy’s explanation on the birds and bees were correct …. then I think I know exactly where I came from ….. would you like a quick lesson?
————–
Yes go on then, i listening……….
August 4th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
coolandcalm Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Coco…. Kate had been made an arguido THEN she stopped answering qurstions. Quite rightly.
——————
Or quite wrongly.
I happen to believe that a mother’s duty to her child outweighs saving her own skin.
Kate clearly disagrees.
You think rightly.
I think wrongly…
August 4th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
Garth:
Trying to catch up with you…to find out what your new theory is?
Wonder what it can be, as for more than a year you’ve insisted and insisted and insisted that the window was open, shutters open, abductor went out that way…
August 4th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
coco Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
[...]
‘No comment’ is the kind of oicky-type of thing that a dragged-up oick-car-thief would say!
Rapists and other dangerous people would say similar.
No comment - is not like asking somebody to refer to an answer made earlier - and is therefore at least a fucking answer.
***
As PeterMac said yesterday: the innocent have the right to be heard and the guilty have the right to remain silent …
August 4th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Garth Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Jezuz wept, where did she come from?
________________________
Well if my mommy’s explanation on the birds and bees were correct …. then I think I know exactly where I came from ….. would you like a quick lesson?
August 4th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Fancy asking somebody if they were handing custody of a child over to another relative!!!
Fancy asking that! Why was that asked? Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
August 4th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Coco…. Kate had been made an arguido THEN she stopped answering qurstions. Quite rightly.
Why are you always so rude? Oh I forgot. You’re only eight.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
OI! June and Chenier …. why can’t I get away with calling him “that prat Paul wot can’t spell” ….. OK, let’s try ……. (I can see an early evening coming up for moi
)
J and C
You should see his emails! we are keeping them for when he is rich and famous, or rich and infamous even.
But really we have means of blackmailing him…( called a strike)
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Coolandcalm or - Hotandchoppy - as I shall refer to you from now on -
‘No comment’ is the kind of oicky-type of thing that a dragged-up oick-car-thief would say!
Rapists and other dangerous people would say similar.
No comment - is not like asking somebody to refer to an answer made earlier - and is therefore at least a fucking answer.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Julie Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Châtelaine Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The bed under the window looks rather untidy. Strange for a bed that hasn’t been used…
_____________________________
P’raps the abductor caught a quick nap before his great Houdini escape with baggage under arm ….
————-
Jezuz wept, where did she come from?
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
the SKY website…
August 4th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
pm
Châtelaine Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The bed under the window looks rather untidy. Strange for a bed that hasn’t been used…
_____________________________
P’raps the abductor caught a quick nap before his great Houdini escape with baggage under arm ….
*********
Yeah must be something like that. Stupid I didn’t think of that
August 4th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Fair Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
2 questions……..
1. Chenier, what email?
2. Who is ”Anorak”? A mod? The boss?
M and A
Fair, can’t answer which email, but I think one containing a dvd of the files?
Anorak owns and creates the site daily, we call him ‘that prat Paul wot can’t spell’
——————-
No; it’s the email mentioned in Anorak’s report above about the DNA results with 15 out of 19 markers matching Madeleine’s.
Believe it or not but I was actually responding to something Anorak had written!
Sometimes known as ‘that prat Paul wot can’t spell’…
There are bits of it quoted on
August 4th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Châtelaine Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The bed under the window looks rather untidy. Strange for a bed that hasn’t been used…
_____________________________
P’raps the abductor caught a quick nap before his great Houdini escape with baggage under arm ….
August 4th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
A QUESTION SHE DID ANSWER
Q. Are you aware that in not answering the questions you are jeopardising the investigation, which seeks to discover what happened to your daughter?
A. ‘Yes, if that’s what the investigation thinks.’
says it all really
August 4th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Fair …. Anorak is the BEEEG BOSS!!! The one who’s shoes you polish on bended knee ….
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The bed under the window looks rather untidy. Strange for a bed that hasn’t been used…
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
COOLANDCALM! I despair of you!
If your daughter was missing, presumed abducted = surely you would want to answer every single one of those questions so that the PJ fucked off and asked somebody else?
Of course you would! Thousands of people go through this line of questioning every year. TO BE ELIMINATED! To show their innocence!
To prove their whereabouts and actions so that PJ get on with other enquiries.
This was not a medical negligence case - Their flesh and blood had evaporated into thin air. She had been missing a very long time when these questions were asked! Numpty!
August 4th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Brandon-where does it say Sky believe there was no abduction.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
7. Assuming Madeleine had been abducted, why did you leave the twins home alone to go to the ‘Tapas’ and raise the alarm? Because the supposed abductor could still be in the apartment.
- so the twins were quite safe to leave alone once more …..
_______________________
Well on this one, she couldn’t exactly answer that the probability was that there was actually no abductor present at the time - he’d dived through the window with Madeleine under his arm already
August 4th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
armen Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Indeed, Anorak.
But when they asked the first question, you wouldn’t know there were another 47 to come; so……
Why wouldn’t you answer the first question?
————
Because she had been advised not to……….. doh!
August 4th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
2 questions……..
1. Chenier, what email?
2. Who is ”Anorak”? A mod? The boss?
M and A
Fair, can’t answer which email, but I think one containing a dvd of the files?
Anorak owns and creates the site daily, we call him ‘that prat Paul wot can’t spell’
August 4th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Anorak Says:
August 4th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
If someone fired 48 questions at me I’d clam up or go bonkers…
…In reality that’s only 4 questions an hour. Harden up.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
coolandcalm
I think it would be more especially if you were scared you were going to be charged with something you had done.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Just so…… by the time they got round to these questions Kate M had already been questioned most of the previous day and answered their questions. She went back the next day, was made an arguido and they started again. She then refused to answer any more.
I can understand that.
August 4th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
Oh Anorak… how I agree with you! I really would go for No Comment, especially if I was scared I was going to charged with something I hadn’t done.