Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
Posted: 13th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- agw on Daily Mail Scuppers BBC’s Wrong Shipping Forecast
- Bat E Bird on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
August 13th, 2008 at 11:57 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:50 am
I shan’t bring up the Garth/RR carvorting saga.
Not suitable before the watershed.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:56 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Thanks for the explanation, Jo. I do believe you! And I was a bit taken aback at the McCanns’ choice of Metodo 3 in the first place. Of all the detective agencies in all the world…..
August 13th, 2008 at 11:55 am
lyn
This is the high tea photo I think , Madeline was supposedly in the creche at this time.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:55 am
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Garth
the official report states that the only finger print on the shutters is Kates - so did she ‘tamper’ with them?
—————–
Really, so you believe that those shutters were wiped clean or washed clean after every fucker opened or closed the shutters. Of course apart from Kates right?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Garth
If the shutters weren’t damaged and weren’t open what made the mcc’s think that they’d been ‘tampered’ with. Unless your suggesting that the madbucter painted them a blooming different colour.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:53 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:49 am
http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/07/cm-news-mccanns-detectives-suspects-of_9432.html
August 13th, 2008 at 11:53 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:50 am
one pigeon Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Garthy
Are you a man then? Could have fooled me….
————–
Bend over and I’ll show ya…………
erm I think you’re the one that likes bending over sunshine - especially when goosey goosey gandolf is about - what’s it like being no.2
August 13th, 2008 at 11:52 am
o Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:51 am
Garth!!!!
:lol: dont get stuck there plizzzzzz yawn…..move on….
Mind your fingers with the bloody shutters: they have a very special life of their own and they pinch and bite and kill
The Shutter Killers
—————–
Bend over and I’ll show you as well……….
August 13th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Garth
the official report states that the only finger print on the shutters is Kates - so did she ‘tamper’ with them?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:51 am
Garth!!!!
dont get stuck there plizzzzzz yawn…..move on….
Mind your fingers with the bloody shutters: they have a very special life of their own and they pinch and bite and kill
The Shutter Killers
August 13th, 2008 at 11:50 am
one pigeon Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Garthy
Are you a man then? Could have fooled me….
————–
Bend over and I’ll show ya…………
August 13th, 2008 at 11:49 am
noseycow Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Barth oops sorry Garth.
You said that the shutters had been tampered with.
Its the first I’d heard of this - I was waiting for an explaination or a link or something, because the only info I had on it was MW saying that they had not been tampered with.
—————
And that caused you to wet your bloomers? Blimey.
Nosey, luvvy,
Assuming that the statement by MW is true it does not mean that the shutters hadn’t been tampered with. Using my common sense (and i know you have problems with yours) it would suggest to me that MW are merely stating that there was no evidence of damage re the ‘jemmied’ bit. Of course, other than obvious damage, how else do y ou fink MW could confirm that they had’nt been touched?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:49 am
Catalina
mmmmm…lets put it like this: M3 is under scrutiny…err…for various “matters” and THIS is not in the news,I can tell you no more than that and you do not have to believe me either
August 13th, 2008 at 11:48 am
brandon flours
This is an interesting photo as Madeleine was supposed to have been in bed on 3rd May! There she is, apparently, and it looks like David Payne maybe feeding her something. Where are the McCanns though. This is a breakthrough for sure.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:46 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Good point; the press originally said Metodo 3 was receiving 50,000 Pounds a month but recently said they only received 60,000 euros for six months work plus 48,000 euros expenses; now these new detectives are said to be receiving 212,000 euros (166,000 Pounds) a month. What can we believe?!
Sorry, didn’t understand your comment about Hacienda…
August 13th, 2008 at 11:45 am
Garthy
Are you a man then? Could have fooled me….
August 13th, 2008 at 11:43 am
Barth oops sorry Garth.
You said that the shutters had been tampered with.
Its the first I’d heard of this - I was waiting for an explaination or a link or something, because the only info I had on it was MW saying that they had not been tampered with.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:42 am
Lyn
surely there will be previous occasions with Madeleine on them.
I never understood why there wasnt one bandied around from the start.
remember the jamie bulger one
August 13th, 2008 at 11:39 am
Catalina Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:35 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:28 am
There was (reportedly) another massive influx of funds in July, and a British newspaper (reportedly) is helping to fund the new detectives, to make up for having printed defamatory comments about the McCanns in the past.
*******
jeje… I”d like to see the balance…..mmmm… I hope you dont believe what the media print do you? ah….the spanish tax office! I really wonder when they”re going to get it right
August 13th, 2008 at 11:38 am
I am so happy !!!
Tescos will deliver my groceries to my middle of nowhere holiday home
In your face sainsburiys
August 13th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Nosey, what are you struggling with re the shutters?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:37 am
There is a child between David Payne and Russell O’Brien that looks like Madeleine? How come these pictures have only come out.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:37 am
lone pigeon Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:32 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:29 am
lone pigeon Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:19 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:14 am
Lone
Can I vanish him?
No you certainly cannot !!!! He was already vanished from me once. I turned up at home from work one day after two years of marriage to an empty house and a note stating that I had been left for another bloke!
—————
What did the other chap fink of you?
The other chap has yet to feel the full force of messing with me sunshine. Don’t you worry. His cards are well and truly marked and I pity the fool cos he will know what it’s like to fuck around with me.
——————
What after two fuckin’ years? How long do you fink he’s gonna wait?
And tell me, does the use of the word ’sunshine’ make you feel like a man?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:35 am
nosey
Yes drinking, smoking, television and takeaways!
Its all we had left!
August 13th, 2008 at 11:35 am
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:28 am
There was (reportedly) another massive influx of funds in July, and a British newspaper (reportedly) is helping to fund the new detectives, to make up for having printed defamatory comments about the McCanns in the past.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:34 am
Lone
I do sympathise since 3 of mine were whooshed clunked sometime ago.We knew who and why they did it.
I cant get into details but ….I do know the feeling
August 13th, 2008 at 11:34 am
well St Patricks night to be exact
August 13th, 2008 at 11:33 am
Lent?? I thought you was meant to give up things that you enjoy for lent
August 13th, 2008 at 11:32 am
Garthy
you were going to back up your statement that the shutters had been tampered with…
August 13th, 2008 at 11:32 am
lent