Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
Posted: 13th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- f0ul on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- dairy on I’m A Celebrity: Quitter Katie Price Wanted To Die With Jedward
- dairy on I’m A Celebrity: Samantha Fox Is Shrinking As ‘Lesbian’ Lover Katie Price Quits
- dairy on Jeremy Kyle: Access All Areas: Kyle Meets The People Of Walmart
August 13th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
Portia Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
[...]
So who is the child on the lap and what is the time of this photo?
***
Cannot identify any of the children on this poor-quality still, however, the time has been reported as being 17:59 on May 3.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:56 pm
Portia
There was a reference to 10 little girls, all interchangeable, in O’Donnell’s article…
M&A
Artemis
In fact the reference was to ‘They all looked the same - all blonde, all pink and pretty.’
No numbers were given.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
ortia Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
I’ve seen photos of the children on this trip. Madeleine was the oldest, the biggest in size, and she was the only one, besides her siblings, with light colored hair.
So who is the child on the lap and what is the time of this photo?
——————-
Why?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
chatelaine
Hmmm thats what I think and she said the parents were all checking their own kids
which would make oldfield a liar, and Madeleine alone for an hour.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Garth
Is that your usual pillow talk ?
——————-
You rotter!
August 13th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
I’ve seen photos of the children on this trip. Madeleine was the oldest, the biggest in size, and she was the only one, besides her siblings, with light colored hair.
So who is the child on the lap and what is the time of this photo?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Mods & Admin, the article above which is several paragraphs of bollox and fukwittery, plus this link http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/
does there appear to be a connection visible to even Stevie Wonder, how standards are slipping, we used to have rules about referrals to fukwits blogs, is that at an end ?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
Saul
I do wonder what Rocinante would make of her gallant knight spilling the beans on a lady.
Other than asking for a cut of the take, of course…
August 13th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
[...] But I am sure she must have had a good idea of the comings and goins more than anyone else.
****
Definitely.
She also reportedly didn’t leave the table when the alarm was raised [and came back to get her camera - had she been taking photos that evening????]
August 13th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Garth
Is that your usual pillow talk ?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:49 pm
Châtelaine Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
MARIE NICHOLS, re Pat Brown I think you were looking for this:
patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/search/label/Kate%20McCann
“A letter from an unknown sender had stated she could be found there in a shallow grave. Four days later, Gerry is on a plane home. I don’t know if he took any luggage with him, anything more than a rucksack (which I don’t know the size of). He only stayed for the day, purportedly to attend some meetings. He claims he had his wallet stolen while getting money from an ATM and later that evening, the wallet was mailed back to him. A rather peculiar story that I wonder might not be a cover for the reason he was late to his meetings; he ostensibly spent the time calling credit card companies to cancel his credit cards.
If I were the police investigator, I would follow up this lead. I would want to know what luggage Gerry took with him to England. I would try to see if there was any proof to the wallet theft story. I would find out if he had any “alone” time on the trip. I would find out if he made those phone calls to the credit card companies and if he really got money from an ATM. I would find out exactly where he was that day through any evidence of his movements (phone call tracking, receipts, witnesses, etc.). I would want to know if anyone met him, especially anyone who he could have transferred a package from one suitcase to another.
I would check all the McCann trips and look for possibly ways for them to transport a body away from Portugal. “
——————-
Fuck me, thats it………….. i’ve had enough.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
usual place
August 13th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
MARIE NICHOLS, re Pat Brown I think you were looking for this:
patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/search/label/Kate%20McCann
“A letter from an unknown sender had stated she could be found there in a shallow grave. Four days later, Gerry is on a plane home. I don’t know if he took any luggage with him, anything more than a rucksack (which I don’t know the size of). He only stayed for the day, purportedly to attend some meetings. He claims he had his wallet stolen while getting money from an ATM and later that evening, the wallet was mailed back to him. A rather peculiar story that I wonder might not be a cover for the reason he was late to his meetings; he ostensibly spent the time calling credit card companies to cancel his credit cards.
If I were the police investigator, I would follow up this lead. I would want to know what luggage Gerry took with him to England. I would try to see if there was any proof to the wallet theft story. I would find out if he had any “alone” time on the trip. I would find out if he made those phone calls to the credit card companies and if he really got money from an ATM. I would find out exactly where he was that day through any evidence of his movements (phone call tracking, receipts, witnesses, etc.). I would want to know if anyone met him, especially anyone who he could have transferred a package from one suitcase to another.
I would check all the McCann trips and look for possibly ways for them to transport a body away from Portugal. “
August 13th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
BF
I think you’ve gotten confuzzed. Its CHATELEINE. Tis me who calls er chatters which may have done the damage. Sorry luv.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
where did you pm me ?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Brandon, you are a busy bee never answering PMs anymore
August 13th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
chaterlaine
Yes she would have been left out unless she scooched up a bit.
But I am sure she must have had a good idea of the comings and goins more than anyone else.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Garth, you mean like that Soothsayer chappie who told us “no CCTV”?
As CSN used to say - “till later.”
August 13th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
yeah goodnight Nosey
August 13th, 2008 at 5:36 pm
AZ
I see you enjoyed the young ones too !
August 13th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
Abraham Zapruder Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Garth you couldn’t even make the team for Scumbag College
—————-
Thats very true. But i pass with flying colours for the barmy brigade. Innit mate?
August 13th, 2008 at 5:34 pm
Nosey, I’m afraid until the photo in question comes back from the image enhancing forensic laboratory, (BOOTS), you will have to wait.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Gandy i have to confess, i have temporarily been converted to the barmy band of fukwits and windylickers and i have to confess it such fun!
A load of bollox but fun nonetheless.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
C&C
amazing what a good photographer and seductive lighting can do.
later all
August 13th, 2008 at 5:31 pm
I tell ‘e all what……….. its great fun being on the conspirators side. I can understand the attraction.
What else ‘ave we got………….
August 13th, 2008 at 5:30 pm
Noseycow…. the chequered past / ciggies / platforms all ring a bell. Even the chaise longue; just the glamour girl bit that doesn’t quite fit!
August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Garth you couldn’t even make the team for Scumbag College
August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Fukwits, lobotomised barmy brigaders and Praline munchers, the above photo is …………………yes that is correct………….some types are very easily led, no what I mean Garth….
August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Chaterlaine
Most of the night she would appear to have been left alone observing opposite her
****
David, Fiona and Rachel reportedly didn’t leave the table neither …
August 13th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
oh really