Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
Posted: 13th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- June on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 FBI And NYPD Pager Messages, Conspiracy Theorists Read On
- June on Chilcot Inquiry Into Iraq War: Day 2 In Pictures
- percy stilton on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- Clairey80 on Nicholas Cage Turns On Bath Christmas Lights, In Photos
- KSA crew on Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 FBI And NYPD Pager Messages, Conspiracy Theorists Read On
August 13th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Definitely not a cranked tower; crooked spire, which, oddly enough, did not uncrook when I stood underneath…
August 13th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Chenny, tis strange i suppose…………. i was referring to the sofa.
Anyway tis quite here at mo….. fancy a nod nod wink wink around the corner?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:48 pm
what with the cranked tower? Never…….
August 13th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Chill Chesterfield Chens
—————
Strangely enough I used to live there; a long time ago…
August 13th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
secret Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Even if the DNA is “crap”, when was it found on Madeleine’s clothes?
Please….
——————-
What is this…….. a bleedin interrogation. I know nuffing. I am from barcelona.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Chill Chesterfield Chens.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
Even if the DNA is “crap”, when was it found on Madeleine’s clothes?
Please….
August 13th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
and to add jo me old star gazer, they shouldnt av been made arguidos in the first place because we know the DNA crap is………. erm……… a load of bollox.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
o Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Garth
Exactely!!!! there was no abduction but there are so many other things which link them to somefink very smelly….err…like old nappies and all,ya knô…..
—————————–
Not quite jo. They were cleared of that status because there was absolutely nuffink to link them to anyfink. Which still begs the question of abduction which you seem unable to grasp.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Garth
Exactely!!!! there was no abduction but there are so many other things which link them to somefink very smelly….err…like old nappies and all,ya knô…..
Drink? na….I am off for my regular ice cream now and later on I am going for a samba night ole ole ole….
xxxx
Be good to the ladies will you?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Jo
I had never heard of cadavar scent being on Madeleine’s clothes!
When was this?
Who said t?
Very interesting.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
Portia
The thing is that not all posters can read french nor portuguese nor spanish and the mods cant check our links for libel
But I do agree: this is a great shame
August 13th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Good question jo…….. of what exactly? Why were they ever made suspects jo? Drink?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
night everyone
xx
August 13th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Garth
Sbmitted too fast
Re Cleared of being suspects of….abduction?
….bbbbbut if there was no abduction of whatelse then?
———-
M&A
Artemis
The Rapture?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
Garth ——————
Cleared of being suspects………………..
And being as im in a good mood………….. bend over
******
Cleared of being suspects of………what?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
portia
the libel laws are different and the mods cant all read portuguese
——
M&A
Artemis
Thank you, BF.
There are times when I can’t read English either.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
M&A
With all respect that is due to your greatness, I respectfully point out that forbidding posts from French and Portuguese sites is an enormous insult to human intelligence.
——-
M&A
Artemis
I am somewhat baffled by your post; can you please explain?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:16 pm
Châtelaine
“It would still not explain, however, the cadaver scent inside the apartment !”
******
on the keys on their clothes on Madeleines clothes………..will you stop that non sense now? the dogs PUT the scent there otherwise how on earth did it get there? very simple init? also,gerry said the dogs were baised!!! whatelse do you want?
Id better go back to my Doll production and I think you deserve one Chatelaine that would come with a pointy little castle , a massive master bedroom with a laaaarge bed and black silk bed sheets with no scent if you dont want too…
August 13th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
jo Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
What you have not noticed Garth,is that they are guilty to the brim
:lol:
:lol:
“Cleared” of what if they were not guilty of anything?
Tell me mate ,tell us
By the way did you make any sense out of the “Murdering Shutters”?
I love you coz you are trying SoOoOo hard….err…to convince yourself,youre a darling and I am in a good mood all of a sudden
——————
Cleared of being suspects………………..
And being as im in a good mood………….. bend over!
August 13th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Chateleine
I dont know what the patio doors were in PDL but ones I’ve seen abroad can be opened from inside & out but can only be locked from the inside. You can move the catch on the lock & then close the door from the outside & then the door would be locked. There is no physical lock on the outside.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
What you have not noticed Garth,is that they are guilty to the brim
“Cleared” of what if they were not guilty of anything?
Tell me mate ,tell us
By the way did you make any sense out of the “Murdering Shutters”?
I love you coz you are trying SoOoOo hard….err…to convince yourself,youre a darling and I am in a good mood all of a sudden
August 13th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
I’m only asking this to be able to exclude certain possibilities again. If the doors were indeed OPEN the children [and all valuables, including at least some watches ...] would have been for grabs.
It would still not explain, however, the cadaver scent inside the apartment !
August 13th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
Sorry if this has been posted but its interesting
“If anyone abducted or concealed Madeleine McCann’s cadaver, that was, until this moment, the perfect crime.”
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/
August 13th, 2008 at 6:05 pm
MN
They have been cleared in case you hadn’t noticed.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:05 pm
Off topic but I watched hart 2 hart in the early hours and they had a cctv camera that could zoom right in clear as day, and that was about 1981.
Why are CCTV cameras so shit these days?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:03 pm
Now, of course, only one check or no checks at all would create a “big” window of opportunity again. Also taking into account that the sliding patio doors were said to be “unlocked”, whereas these - inasmuch I know them - can only be locked and opened from the inside. If these doors were indeed used for the checks [instead of the further away front door on the street side] this would mean that they were OPEN.
Can anyone help me on the actual type of patio doors in the PdL apartment?
August 13th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Garth
“Fuck me, thats it………….. i’ve had enough”
———-
Checking them thoroughly would have helped clear them very soon if they had nothing to hide. Better than still asking ourselves too many questions 16 months later. Don’t you think?
Thank you Châtelaine.
August 13th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
I agree with O’donnell.
If you actually knew the kids then you would easily be able to indentify which was which. But if you just saw them around with other kids all over the place then you wouldn’t have a clue.
August 13th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 5:54 pm
Hmmm thats what I think and she said the parents were all checking their own kids
which would make oldfield a liar, and Madeleine alone for an hour.
****
Yes, according to her GM and MO were mistaken. Putting time-lines together it would seem that there was only one check between start of the dinner and 10 pm, which would have been GM himself [if he did have/take the time to go in, check and have a pee]