Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
Posted: 13th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- Bat E Bird on In Photos: Susan Boyle Sings Rockefeller Center Plaza In New York City
- Julie Roach on I’m A Celebrity Watch: Katie Price Is More Hated Than Baby P’s Mum
- yampster on The Pirelli 2010 Calendar In Artful Nudity (NSFW)
- yampster on Climate Gate: Politicians Investigate CRU’s Emails And The BBC Sat On The Story
August 13th, 2008 at 11:31 pm
ah Gandolf
But the aguido status has been lifted on the basis of the investigation.
the same one that you think has been discredited.
mmm cake and eating it springs to mind
August 13th, 2008 at 11:31 pm
GUYS! If you have a sense of hinour - just click on ‘Magazines’ at top of Anorak and look for Taliban Lads Mags if you want to know what this snidey fucker is on about.
The part of his brain that should have humour in it, is haddled by childhood memories I think.
Saul and Carmen’s are still the best ones - mine ar just unsophisticated filth! I admit it totally.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Not if ees dead……
August 13th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
Gnadlof
if i understood what you meant by.. any one who thinks that sort of nonsense can be made in context it would be helpful
August 13th, 2008 at 11:27 pm
GANDOLF: ‘And of course the smutty jokes about nine year olds and lads mags………some people should be strung up by the short and curlies in downtown Bahgdad……….’
…………………………………
Downtown Baghdad would quite rightly string you up by your bollocks!
Coz if it’s good enough for the Prophet - it’s good enough for them!
So give your gonads a bit of attention - coz you might not have a dangle left shortly. You fucking ill-educated excuse for a poster.
MODS and ADMIN! Please don’t ever ban this poster. He lends much to the Clannies.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
The same as the AG’s statement that there was no evidence ……….although Amaral seemed to think there was……….so on that basis that Amarals investigation was discredited…….we can safely put abduction at the top of the list….how many arguidos at present NC ?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Gilly
How the devil are you?
i like the memory card one - would explain why they were being sold rather than handed to the police.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
gandolf……
‘oo do you reckon is dave 46. and won’t he be 47? now
August 13th, 2008 at 11:25 pm
Jos blog is very interesting tonight
August 13th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
coco
many many moons ago I realised that certain ‘types’ of poster don’t appreciate the smilies.
So I always include as many as possible in my posts
August 13th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Fleetingly……..
imo the picture can;t be one the tourist took (!) cos they haven’t been bought yet.
its either from the cctv - in which case there are more, which should be interesting.
or its off the memory card in gerry’s wallet that was “stolen”.
the stolen memory card would explain the lack of pictures from the holiday and he may well have told the pj he didn;t realise it was in his wallet. hence the older pictures of madeleine and the possibly altered pool photo?
only hazarding a guess.
by the way……….. the chaise longue? i confess. twas me. i drink coffee, smoke, wear platforms and am desperate to gain fame and fortune.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
Well NC it has to be said, any one who thinks that sort of nonsense can be made in context…………..wants fukin with a large bargepole……
August 13th, 2008 at 11:22 pm
Gandolf
so what do you make about the PJ report when they found absolutley no evidence.. of abduction
August 13th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Gandolf
August 13th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Allo Dave 46……….still fishin for emails……
August 13th, 2008 at 11:20 pm
Noseycow Kitten! Not caught up properly today! Course you can!
Not too bothered about spelling as long as the poster’s point gets across .
And passion! Swearing to convey passion is OK - but nothing gratuitous!
Unless it pisses people off who we don’t like and who don’t like us.
That’s when I nearly get banned! lol
August 13th, 2008 at 11:19 pm
And of course the smutty jokes about nine year olds and lads mags………some people should be strung up by the short and curlies in downtown Bahgdad……….
August 13th, 2008 at 11:18 pm
coco Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Nosecow! Paragraph 1 Section C Part viiii - DON’T LEAVE THE KIDS OUT OF EAR-SHOT.
Most specific on that!
unless they’re psikids.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:17 pm
All will be revealed in due course. I still laugh at the dick*eads, who try to disrupt on here. They can shine their shiny exhausts as fast as they want. But only as fast as Mr R allows them too.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Nosecow! Paragraph 1 Section C Part viiii - DON’T LEAVE THE KIDS OUT OF EAR-SHOT.
Most specific on that!
August 13th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Coco
it has been noted that you don’t accept my rather generous offer of being Minister for spelling
with my unlimited spelling talenst I feel I could make a big difference to the education of out children - if they survive the aliens/giant squids and holidays of course.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Secret, let me let you into a secret…………thank fuk you aint a detective, but you will always be a defective………….
August 13th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Well they are rightly concerned that you use the correct ppe when handling dangerous chemicals. I wonder if they have some health and safety guidence for dealling with hungrey alliens?
August 13th, 2008 at 11:13 pm
SAUL! Congratulations! You have just won my prize for being the only person who can actually spell that properly!
I have seen all kinds of chaise lounges recently - but youu spell it properly!
August 13th, 2008 at 11:11 pm
Saul Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
[...] More to the point, I understand that the “Chaise Longue one “, may be a lot closer to Anorak Towers than we think.
****
Saul …! How can I for once for to the silken sheets in time when you continue to tickle our curiosity and imagination …? Is it Duncan????
August 13th, 2008 at 11:11 pm
Noseycow! Love you for bringing this up!
Errrrrr! Errrrrr! You know! Ahem! Errrrrr! Yeah! Yer right! Yer right!
Errrrrr! It was only a small window (of opportunity!) But errrrrr!
Yer know - somebody was watchin’ you know! So I errrrr had to bend down like yer know - with mi bucket n that yer know n like errrrr just wipe it all as fast as I could yer know - so that nobody saw me like!
Coz errrrrr I didn’t want authorities comun’ round and breathin down my neck for not wearin’ the right clothin’ n gloves- yer know1
August 13th, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Saul
Do you know who it is????
(the chaise lounge thingy, not gandy or garthy - though I’d be interested in knowing who they are as well! : grin: )
August 13th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
So, the latest person posting as Garth is keeping up the Dickhead theme. What about the Gandolf’s , dont you just love them, so predictable. More to the point, I understand that the “Chaise Longue one “, may be a lot closer to Anorak Towers than we think.
August 13th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
Looks like Soothsayer has had to bugger off and put ointment on his nether regions!
Now I am going to do a spell for all the nice people on Anorak to have health, wealth and happiness forever and ever! X
August 13th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
coco
PMSL
Was this before or after you bleached the room?