
Madeleine McCann: Tourist Has New Pictures Of Tapas 7 For Sale
PAULO Reis has published an interesting piece of information on the Madeleine McCann case on his site. Read on:
“McCann case: 24 pictures that may help to re-open the case
A tourist who was (allegedly) at the Tapas Bar, on the night of May 3, took several pictures where the table with the McCanns and their friends is visible.
The tourist was with his wife and another couple and they took pictures from each other, with the McCann table on the background.
The owner of the pictures is (said to be) negotiating with several British newspapers to sell the rights for an exclusive publication, but with a condition: before being published, the pictures must be sent to the Portuguese police.
The tourist is well aware that the pictures may have important evidence related with a crime and not sending it to police is considered also a crime, in his country.
Yesterday, a well known legal office from UK (allegedly) knew about the existence of those pictures and contacted the owner, offering to buy all pictures for 600,000 Euros. But the British lawyers didn’t accept the condition set by the owner – that the pictures should be sent to the Portuguese police, just before the transaction. The lawyers’ office wanted to be free to choose the moment when the pictures would be send to Portuguese authorities, so the offer was refused by the tourist.“
The original article is here: http://gazetadigitalmadeleinecase.blogspot.com/2008/08/mccann-case-24-pictures-that-may-help.html
Wrires Carmen:
Assuming that the above is true and genuine, it begs the question, when exactly did ‘British lawyers’ feel that they were able to dictate when information in a criminal case should be handed over to the police? Is Madeleine not a Ward of Court, are they not officers of the court? Do they not have a duty to the court - the British court - not just the Portuguese court, to instantly hand over any information that may be pertinent to solving the riddle of what happened to Madeleine.
I have mixed feelings regarding the purchase of information when it is done by newspapers, but is this a new era, that information is being purchased by lawyers, who then decide what to do with it?
Why has the tourist not come forward before?
What or whom, is, or is not, in those photographs that makes them worth 600,000 euros.
Where is the 600,000 euros coming from - the last we heard the McCann Find Madeleine fund was down to it’s last 480,000 euros.So it could not possibly be the legal firm involved with the McCann Fund…could it?
One other question would be if the tourist sold the pictures to a legal firm intent on suppression - would the gent have his collar felt?
Posted: 13th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (730) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





August 13th, 2008 at 10:33 am
It would have to be o brien who was away most of the time!
August 13th, 2008 at 10:33 am
Wasn’t there a question about what clothes they were wearing that night? A photo could give the answer.
Could it be that these people never thought their photos were interesting for the police, and now, after the files have come out, they realise there is something interesting about them. Still, it doesn’t ring true. What sort of people would sell information to the lawyers instead of giving it straight away to the police? It sounds like blackmail to me.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:32 am
MATT! Have you got anything to hand to exterminate coolandcalm - the muttondaggerless one who was threatening Mods with a sword of Damocles or something equally ridiculous the other day?
If she was an animal I would have to put her out of her misery. She’s laughing like a hyena now about fuck all.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:30 am
coco Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:29 am
What if JT hid from JW? And that’s why he did not know she was there.
—————-
Shaaatuuuuuuuup!
August 13th, 2008 at 10:29 am
Coco
I dont want to sound personal or anyfing but ……….. have you got a hairy arse?
August 13th, 2008 at 10:29 am
What if JT hid from JW? And that’s why he did not know she was there.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:28 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Indeed she was.
But her advice is still sound.
A wise mum. IMO
August 13th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Coco…..
you are so funny…..
August 13th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Matt. Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:22 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:17 am
Several other posters were of that suspicion too.
May I refuse the sweetie ?
My mum always told me to never let strangers give me sweets.
Run away from them…..she said…..as fast as your little legs allow you to.
————
And of course she was absolutley right. But you know Matt, i think she was referring to when you were young and naive…………
August 13th, 2008 at 10:24 am
Whoooooooooooooooooooooooooossssssh clunk clunk clunk clunk…..
CARMEN!!!!!!!
August 13th, 2008 at 10:24 am
My box of dollies are all scrapping and screaming and shouting abuse here.
I am going to have to separate them back into their own boxes. Then I will interrogate them individually later.
I’ll clear the ground beneath my feet first and start with the Parent Dollies - like a good cop would - and if the Milk Tray Men Dollies come interfering I will stamp on them.
Then I’ll do the rest of the Tapastwats …… and then I think I will have all the answers I need.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:22 am
Garth Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:17 am
Several other posters were of that suspicion too.
May I refuse the sweetie ?
My mum always told me to never let strangers give me sweets.
Run away from them…..she said…..as fast as your little legs allow you to.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:17 am
Matt. Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:14 am
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:11 am
In moderation.
For quoting a post which has been put into moderation and then released.
Oh….I did add the comment :
It is indeed very feasible that such a scenario may have happened.
Was my suspicion some time ago on here too.
—————
Then you must take the credit. Here, have a sweety.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:16 am
oco Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Now let it drop - you sad dried-up old bag - who comes on here to be titillated by male company - They are probably women like your miserable self anyway.
—————-
So there………… nah nah nahnah nah. Grow up ffs luv.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:16 am
Was Ian a bird ?????
August 13th, 2008 at 10:14 am
brandon flours Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:11 am
In moderation.
For quoting a post which has been put into moderation and then released.
Oh….I did add the comment :
It is indeed very feasible that such a scenario may have happened.
Was my suspicion some time ago on here too.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:13 am
ust_me Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:47 am
morning all
just a couple of questions., if thie photo is genuine, where exactly did k & g sit? could they see the apartment from that window? why are the other children there in high chairs, when they were supposed to be in the apartment with a baby moniter or whatever? where are k & g if they were supposed to be at the table first?
—————-
They’re are under starters orders………………..
August 13th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Coolandcalm
Will you stop talking as if you are in a fucking Elizabethan play - with your pathetic attempts at asides and your pregnant pauses?
You are not amusing to me that’s all.
YOU - Mrs Muttondaggerless libelled me for no reason other than that I have wounded your ego a bit because I tell you when your posts are crap! I love it when people tell me mine are crap because I learn from it.
Now let it drop - you sad dried-up old bag - who comes on here to be titillated by male company - They are probably women like your miserable self anyway.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Where did Matts go to ?
August 13th, 2008 at 10:07 am
coco Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
‘ Garth wrote ……….Sounds to me as if C&C’’s touched a sensitive area. Coco, have you thought about Big Brother? You’d do well on that!
……………………..
WHY? Why would I do well? Would they keep gently caressing my sensitive areas - coz I might just give it a go!
Why can’t you get a job? Don’t answer that.
——————-
Fortunately im in a position whereby i can take time off to look after my kids whilst they are on holiday. Although i must admit im wasting a lot of good time here. But then its shit weather isn’t it?
August 13th, 2008 at 10:06 am
Yes the talking to jez seemed to stop him from going further down that way for a time,
maybe someone else was trying to do it,
and gerry couldnt stop him ( jez) any longer and didnt get to do it.
always did remind me of the famous fawlty towers scene
August 13th, 2008 at 10:05 am
coolandcalm Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
Garth……. sadly some people like to dole it out but can’t take it.
—————-
Indeed. Shame really, she had so many convinced.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
‘ Garth wrote ……….Sounds to me as if C&C’’s touched a sensitive area. Coco, have you thought about Big Brother? You’d do well on that!
……………………..
WHY? Why would I do well? Would they keep gently caressing my sensitive areas - coz I might just give it a go!
Why can’t you get a job? Don’t answer that.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
Garth……. sadly some people like to dole it out but can’t take it.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:04 am
AZ
Make your point when you’re ready………………
August 13th, 2008 at 10:03 am
Or the TAPPAS! 10 TH
!!!!!!!!!!
August 13th, 2008 at 10:02 am
Carmen Says:
August 13th, 2008 at 9:58 am
Chatelaine’s excellent post has now been released.
——————
Whats the ‘excellent’ bit about it? Could you explain the reasons for your obvious delight?
August 13th, 2008 at 10:01 am
wtf… sorry. I didn’t you your post until after I’d posted. Multi-tasking malfunction.
August 13th, 2008 at 10:00 am
Will the tourists photo have
a terrible twos situation
an affair
a stranger looking
a row
………………………………………. ?
August 13th, 2008 at 9:58 am
Just_me…. the photo above is allegedly a still from CCTV at the beach cafe. It wasn’t in the Tapas Bar… they’re the ones that maybe a tourist has and is trying to flog!