Carefull if you smoke in bed afterwards

So what’s the point of making that remark about them smiling when leaving the church? Because you haven’t seen people smile weeks after a funeral, does that make it wrong or even suspicious? And yes I’ve seen the photo. Did you ever had a look at perceptual Ambiguity? Did you really read what Pat Brown wrote about bias? “We all carry around our own preconceived ideas and opinions on issues of small and large importance whether we consciously realize it or not.”

You can’t be sure if there’s no evidence that would serve in court, because you [we] don’t have really access to the evidence, and the case hasn’t been to court. The AG didn’t say “not enough evidence” nor did he say “no evidence that would serve in court” he’s said “not having obtained evidence of the practice of any crime by the defendants.”
I will change my mind when I see proof/evidence and they’re charged and convicted. So far the opposite occurs. In fact, I would even be sort of “happy” if they found evidence of parental involvement, because it means
a) she didn’t suffer as awful as I don’t even want to imagine and
b) because there’s no criminal still on the loose who’s able to hurt or even kill another child.
On the other hand, I wouldn’t be “happy” thinking of the twins, the family, the friends, the people who’ve helped them/donated to the fund.

I agree the debate is interesting [well sometimes] but do you think that where a whole team of experienced investigators with full knowledge of the place, the persons, the evidence, etc. failed, we would succeed? Sorry, I don’t think so. We don’t know who’s been investigated, and most people over here concentrate on the parents or other people of who’s existence we know. There’s lots of people of whom we don’t know anything. Who stayed at the complex? Who lives in PdL? Did they [the police] knock on these 400+ doors, or did they search the houses? What appartments did they search? Did they check the closets and when? We’ve seen pictures and [biased] stories in the papers. That’s it!

I do have some reasons to doubt Amaral. Which I won’t explain over here.
I could blame the parents for their selfish behaviour that [most probably] caused their daughter’s harm. I could also blame the person in charge of the initial investigation for … better not say that.

Goodnight to you too Châtelaine.

I do suggest, though, that you take you argument where it should be, which is with the Moderators, not here.
I’ve got to know all Moderators to be intelligent, well-educated, honest, fair and dedicated to this site and its cause. If this can be solved, they will.
Good night.

I agree with Peter Mac too on that important point . What do the files say about it? Are there records about the changing versions?

Time for bed. Bonne nuit. XXXX
****
I’ll try and check files available tomorrow morning.
Nice to see we agree again
Bonne nuit 2u2, Marie.
You allow me “bisous”?

That was foolish if she did really did that. Surely it was meant as a joke? I recall she tried it and failed [also a couple of days ago] and I told her it was impossible unless she’s got the username as well as the email address. I forgot about the IP address.
But as it’s your site, and it’s your decision, so it’s up to you to decide.
And please don’t get mad at me, as I like the ‘free speech’ approach of Anorak.

I agree with Peter Mac too on that important point . What do the files say about it? Are there records about the changing versions?

Time for bed. Bonne nuit. XXXX

But, don’t forget: “It was our holiday too” …

Sad to say, but do you think many people would let their children spend a few days holiday with them, knowing that they leave them at the creche morning and afternoon, don’t share their evening meal with them most of the time, and leave them alone to cry at night in an unlocked appartment?