
Madeleine McCann: Maddie For Rose Ron, Praia Da Luz Moves And Whacking Stephanie Bysh
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
THE SUN: “Hol mum of left girl faces jail”
To Portugal…
A BRITISH mum whose daughter was taken into care on holiday faces up to ten years in jail.
It’s “cash-strapped Stephanie Bysh”.
What do we know about here?
She a brunette. And, as reported, she and one Ariella D’Gamo were “sleeping on the streets before a friend took them in. The worried pal took the eight-year-old girl to cops in Lagos, Portugal. She is now staying at a children’s home.”
How does Madeleine McCann fit in?
Bysh fled the resort — near where Madeleine McCann disappeared in May 2007 — but collapsed with kidney problems in Portimao 15 miles away.
That close, eh. Yesterday the incident was 25 miles from where our Maddie went missing. Such are the facts.
DAILY MAIL: “Fears the ‘Israeli Madeleine McCann’ has been killed by her own mother and grandfather”
You mean Rose Ron’s grandfather who told police that he had killed the 4-year-old?
What more of their Maddie?
At its heart lies the bizarre love triangle in which little Rose’s grandfather fell in love with his son’s young bride and fathered two more daughters with her. Police say the grandfather has admitted killing the child and dumping her in a river, but no body has been found and there is no forensic evidence proving her death.
Just like our Maddie, then? It’s uncanny.
Ha’aretz (Israel): “’Sick twist’: World media plays up story of ‘Israeli Madeleine McCann’”
Rose Ron is missing. She’s been given the nickname Maddie…
Posted: 28th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (671) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





August 29th, 2008 at 4:32 pm
oh and Pamela while you are at it a translation of Penningtons statement in english to save Marie the trouble
August 29th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
Pamela
think you need to go and read your case notes…
August 29th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Pamela, Gollum is a Tolkein character and so are trolls, it was a literary allusion, but if the cap fits…
Jes Wilkins sighting of a woman in a purple dress was earlier on that evening, as I understand it. If you have read that Mr Wilkins positively identified Jane Tanner at the time she saw the strange man then I would be interested to see the link for this.
You see, in my view it would be very difficult for Jane to see Jes and Gerry but for them not to see her. Try it for yourself - its not easy unless you are peeping out from behind a lamp post.
August 29th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
clouseau Says:
“Pamela
quite right a certain police force has some questions to answer in my opinion”
Police forces don’t answer questions - on the advice of their lawyers !
August 29th, 2008 at 4:12 pm
Pamela
quite right a certain police force has some questions to answer in my opinion
August 29th, 2008 at 4:11 pm
He knew her dress was purple because he’s, what, psychic then? I think he says he saw her, just NOT when she said she saw him, or do I have that completely wrong?
August 29th, 2008 at 4:08 pm
Um, it’s one doctor, right? I believe her husband said he did not take the conversation to be about a child, right? And his wife says she kept, not Madeleine’s parents, but a third party from her children while they were bathing, no? And, even if such unsupported evidence could be presented against Madeleine ’s parents in some sort of new “guilty by association” charge, the witness would then be in a fair amount of trouble for not having reported such suspicions to the overseeing body for medical professionals, no? I mean, that would be a VERY big violation here.
August 29th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Pamela Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
‘ tell me again how the guy talking to Gerry in the street was able to accurately describe the color of HER dress?’
what, the one that didn’t see her ?
agree though that in jt’s statement right from the start she describes bundleman carrying a barefooted child in pj’s which may have had a pattern on them. i haven’t checked but i think she said the pj’s were white.
August 29th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Marie
yes no smoke without fire
August 29th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
: )
Not a troll–just not obsessed, my precious! Although, I have been spending a lot of time with a ninth-grader and her geometry homework lately, so if “troll is congruent with disproves” and “objective is congruent with disproves,” I suppose I am a troll. Transitive is it?
About the lighting: A year later the witness statement is made public, and “She was WRONG!” becomes “She couldn’t possibly have been RIGHT under those lights!”???
Interesting.
You don’t think at all that might be why she described them as white, pink, or maybe white with a pink pattern then? Now, tell me again how the guy talking to Gerry in the street was able to accurately describe the color of HER dress?
August 29th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
clouseau
Not to be mentioned, though, if you and I are thinking of the same thing. (Too bizarre).
August 29th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
coolandcalm - right on the money with your post. As far as M&A are concerned they have absolute power, and power corrupts. And absolute power corrupts absolutely.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
goodnight daisy
August 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pm
lone, nasty but i don’t read a threat in it. sorry. he’s nasty, just ignore if you can.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Has Garth been zapped? Well time for me to come on to prove I am not him.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:51 pm
I have no idea what Garth said in his pulled post or if he is in the chiller but I am surprised that BountyHunters personal abuse from earlier has been allowed to stay put without any comment.
Or am I not surprised? Coco seems able to abuse at will without reprimand or censure.
Gooses and ganders and sauces springs to mind here!
—–
M&A
Artemis
I believe M&A specifically commented on this, apologising to Totje. Indeed, you must have read that comment since you subsequently mentioned the term ‘cyber adult’ used by M&A.
It would be nice if you had at least acknowledged M&A’s comments.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
abraham, so many conflicting reports, one doesn’t know what to think often. maybe the pariso photo was taken on a differnt day. i do think one of the children in it looks like madeleine, the other child closest in age to her is jt’s daughter, who is somewhat smaller i think and has darker hair.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:46 pm
just so
should that be which are who…i went to comprehensiv
August 29th, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Pamela
I know 2 doctors which have made certain allegations
August 29th, 2008 at 3:42 pm
MN, I’m sorry; I don’t mean to offend you, especially when you’ve been so helpful with the translations, but several people came forward in Austria to say they had suspected something, that the father was always a pervert or a jerk or scary, that they had been denied needed access to the cellar, etc., etc., etc. Further, I believe these anecdotal witness accounts were supported by previous charges for sex crimes, no?
August 29th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Just So
Thanks!
August 29th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Pamela,
The point about the colour of the pyjamas is that it is physically impossible to identify the colour pink under the sodium streetlighting that exists there.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Looks like the latest line of attack is “You are all wasting your time raking through these statements.”
Tricksy little trolls, curse them, we must have our precious statements, we wants them, we needs them…….
August 29th, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Pamela,
I can see your point, but it doesn’t always work that way : think of the Austrian father who kept his daughter locked in the basement, and gave her I can’t remember how many children. Nobody would have said anything against him before.
In the MC’s case, K MC’s own mother didn’t seem to know they left the children alone at night.
Anyway, very few people think they hurt the child, most people think it could have been an accident, which means they aren’t murderers with a devious personality.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
Marie Nicholas,
Your English is very good and everything you write is perfectly understandable.
If you are really wanting it to be perfect, then here’s a few very trivial errors.
The McCann couple has 3 children - The McCanns have 3 children.
During no dinner did the witness or her husband go to their appartment - Neither the witness nor her husband ever went to their appartment whilst at dinner
The witness states that Kate and Gerry, went to the club to see if the children were all right, several times and regularly - The witness states that Kate and Gerry went regularly to their apartment to see if the children were all right.
appartement - apartment
Keep up the good work. It is very much appreciated!
August 29th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
Lone,
I saw his last post disappear. I think he is in the freezer now, so he won’t bother you at the moment.
Now I’m gone.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Pamela
nearly choked on my full english
August 29th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Have to go now.
Good Night.
August 29th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Here you go everyone. This is what Garth is all about. Read it and think he is talking to you, about your unborn. Nice eh. Garth - You might laugh now but trust me I will be laughing loudest…..
Garth Says:
The thought must be horrible eh pigeon? Just imagine, your little newborn with that fresh little smile and then whoosh, some fucker nabs it. Bastard eh?
August 29th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Marie Nicholas/Pamela
If you want to make interesting comparisons try the Sarah Payne case, the parents’ evidence would have been something like “our children were out playing with others, our son saw our daughter going home on her own, no one saw her after that.”
Or Soham - “our daughter went out with a friend, they should have been back ages ago, we’ve phoned everyone we could think of, we’ve looked everywhere, we don’t know what’s happened to her.”
Short and to the point, no mish-mash, all corroborated, no contradictions.