Madeleine McCann: Stephanie Bysh And Ariella Encroach On Praia Da Luz
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
STEPHANIE Bysh is mother to Ariella d’Gama, who has passed a while in a children’s home.
What has it got to do with Madeleine McCann. Well, get this:
DAILY MAIL: “British mother whose daughter was taken into care by Portuguese police after she ‘went out drinking’”
A British man told police that her mother Stephanie Bysh, 44, had been ‘drinking heavily’… The town is five miles from Praia da Luz, where missing toddler Madeleine McCann disappeared in May last year from a rented apartment.
Yes, just five miles.
Yesterday, it was all just 15 miles from where our Maddie went missing.
The day before that it was all occuring 25 miles from Praia da Luz.
Anorak estimates that inside week, little Ariella will be actually inside the apartment used by the McCanns that fateful trip…
Such are the facts…
Posted: 29th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (952) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- leesmith on Michelle Obama Is A Monkey And Other Offensive Google Images
- magnetite on Church Gives Soul Tattoos To Worshippers
- Evie Walton on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- yampster on The Chilcot Inquiry Into The Iraq War, In Pictures
- yampster on Join The Campaign For Straight Gay Marriages
August 30th, 2008 at 8:01 am
Never been adored before!!!!
August 30th, 2008 at 8:00 am
You are as usual mistaken, the case has been shelved as unsolved/missing person. The email link has been posted for the PJ press office.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:59 am
Willo - I adore you for that! So we have Anus Trip and Garsehole!
May be same person! lol
August 30th, 2008 at 7:58 am
Funny thing is it’s also an anagram for ‘Spin Rut’ and we are only an ‘a’ away from ‘Tapas ruin’.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:57 am
jass Says:
I think she looks unwashed and neglected in many pictures.
Look at the tennis balls pic, which I think was taken by a staff member at Ocean Club.
Her hair looks dirty, she’s bruised on her arms and legs, She has red marks on her arm. She certainly hasn’t got pretty clothes or sandals on…she is no “princess” in that photo.
————-
Morning jass,
exactly. And it’s strange that whenever there are photos of the twins, they are never look the way Madeleine looks in the tennis photo.
There was a Portuguese (or Spanish) artist who worked on the tennis photo, remember? It was a very interesting artistic approach …
August 30th, 2008 at 7:57 am
coco Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 7:50 am
Gailen is a completely Fuck-
Sorry Willo Darling I have new false nails and I can’t type properly!
There is something positively mutinous afoot - and there seems to be a cliquey bit of bollocks going on between those who see themselves as the Guardians of the Written Word - like Professor Pam and the CuckooClam and the idiotic Gay-lennies who state libel to quote libel and then start having a thromby hissy-fit because the Mods don’t ban me - so may stay away now that I have rattled all the cages.
Had a quick scan-read and I’m mentioned more than M. The delightful Jo had to remind people that this is about M and not Coco.
They’re not clever enough to make me drop a bollock but there are others on here who don’t know the crack and I am sick of warning them!
August 30th, 2008 at 7:54 am
When you realise that Rasputin is an anagram of ‘Anus Trip” it maybe a good idea to stop addressing him/her.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:50 am
Gailen is a completely Fuck-
August 30th, 2008 at 7:49 am
‘Tis an ill wind that be blowin’.
I don’t know what the posters are up to after reading through the posts from yesterday - but there is something afoot. Shall we stop addressing the Rasputins - or including them?
I am happy to butt out at the moment after what happened to Lone Pigeon through Garsehole.
Watch the CuckooClam, Whoops and Totje. There are some proper Half-Wits and Fuck-Wits baying for blood- and it ain’t just mine. I’m just a stool pigeon!
August 30th, 2008 at 7:48 am
Hi coco.
Do you know if these people are chosen from the queues outside the dole office or are they actually McCann kinf0lk?
And has Doris had her Day?
August 30th, 2008 at 7:46 am
So are you saying the abduction case is officially closed as there is no evidence?
Maybe thats why it was shelved as a homocide/concealment of body case.
I like the AG. He could have closed the whole affair. But no, he left it open, on purpose I think. He knows.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:44 am
Morning Willo!
August 30th, 2008 at 7:21 am
Not quite an idea, just a statement of fact from the Attorney General, you know, the one you don’t like.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:08 am
Why don’t the McCann let their phone activity be investigated, answer those 48 questions and release their bank details and go back to Portugal for a reconstruction?
Surely that is what innocent parents would do. That they don’t, to me, implies they have something to hide.
Take into account their changing of stories and Clarries spin, false sightings…..the list goes on…..All these points further the case for at least neglect, cruelty and maybe more.
They were not proved innocent, they just( for the while) cannot be proved guilty to the satifaction of the Portugese legal system, whether because of withheld evidence, political pressure or just to many smoke and mirror senarios. But I think most lateral thinking people would agree they know more than they are saying and if they wanted to help find their daughter they would cooperate.
So if they are innocent why not cooperate, any ideas Rasputin?
August 30th, 2008 at 6:49 am
Totje Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 11:33 pm
firestar
Ah but did it happen when they were on duty, as doctors in the hospital, not as parents?
No? So whatever happened wasn’t related to their profession [most probably].
So the doctors aren’t suspected, the parents are/were.
And now they are no more arguido’s.
Now what did Gandy tell us, what did the AG say?
No evidence of involvement/commiting any crime by the 3 arguido’s.
8888888888888
Well said Totje, Gandalf had the measure of them all here, it appears one mod in particular is extremely intimidated by Gandalf, but as the world knows Gandalf moves in mysterious ways, my little pocket Venus. It appears that most here discount the Attorney General’s statement through sheer ignorance, but cannot back that ignorance up.
August 30th, 2008 at 4:15 am
Just popping in for a short while … G’Day!
I think many are reading too much into too many things!
If the way a child looks at a particular moment in time (picture) is an indication of how loved (or not) that child is, then 90% of the kids here in Australia would fall into the category of being unloved! No one here knows if Maddie was loved well or not. We only know that she was left alone night after night (which in my books is neglectful), but it doesn’t mean that she wasn’t wanted or loved.
The fact that she was an IVF baby has nothing to do with this case. Many kids now-a-days are conceived by IVF or GIFT and it’s wonderful IMO that parents who have trouble conceiving can have access to modern medicine to have a family. So, JO, please stop saying that having an IVF child is somehow something to be ashamed of or it is wrong and therefore they would be more prone to be mistreated. Many kids are conceived naturally and they are neglected!
The photo of the playground seems normal to me. I have in the past studied it carefully and don’t see anything wrong with composition or proportions, shadows, etc.
Gailen,
I have seen a photo of KM with bruises on the inside of her upper arm, but have never seen any photo with MM and bruises on her. If a child has some small bruises, it is normal, as they run and fall and hit themselves climbing, etc. But, seeing photos on an adult, is more of a concern to me.
I still believe that GM is the controlling force in that family. I still doubt his paternity, because, after all they are doctors and have access to paperwork, etc. But of course, this is just my personal view.
I do believe that one (or two) of the group is responsible for what happened to the child, but am not convinced it is the parents.
August 30th, 2008 at 2:33 am
wtf
What is it with husbands and wives posting under the same name???????
It reminds me of RR.
Of course his wife wasn’t real.
August 30th, 2008 at 2:25 am
One question is unanswered, and that is, why did Gerry McCann lose his holiday photos?I have never lost holiday photos!
August 30th, 2008 at 1:11 am
MR WTF, ,just before turning in, read your post. Interesting you say Garth has a Clarrie-style … Hm … something to ponder on
Good night “all” and yes, of course, including Duncan and Carmen
August 30th, 2008 at 1:01 am
yes chatalaene, it took a long time for that one to be released.
re garth, i don’t like him, sick yes, but not threatening, but maybe i think so because i was not targeted and were i, i would think differently. i have been cyberstalked in the past, but nobody realises or cares or takes it seriously if it doesn’t actually involve them is my experience, so i should know better.
August 30th, 2008 at 1:00 am
Hello garth vader its mr wtf here. I read your post to my wife , that you posted earlier in the day. I thought it was intriguing that you could think ill health of me when this site is supposed to be about Madeleine and the theories of what actually happened. I think you must be a small man with a big car to cover the fact you have insecurities. My body to be hurt in anyway, i would gladly like you to attempt that. I enjoy reading the posts on here as i believe that things are not right and they havent been from day one , with the tapas group. Mrs wtf posts on here and gets on with certain posters and i was chuffed with the response from them about my job. You garth vader is a sad little man with no proper conversation or facts to this mystery. I thought you were bang out of order with your rasicts comments a while back, which you tried to cover up with a bit of spin ” Clarrie style”. Fair play Mods and A stepped in and i just read your posts , not even replying to them. Sad sad man.
August 30th, 2008 at 12:55 am
if you want to get really fancy, i think it’s possible to download a pix from a digikam, doctor it, resize and recompress it and reload it onto the digikam so it looks like a photo taken just from the camera, but just how feasible is that ?
August 30th, 2008 at 12:54 am
Evening, Sam. No photoshopping is not difficult at all. I do it all the time [for innocent reasons]… What’s really STRANGE is that this famous “last photo” was released with so much delay!
Apart from that, I would like to say that much of the “verbal abuse” going on here doesn’t really bother me - we’re all adults in cyber space - however, that Garth’s text yesterday regarding Lone Pigeon’s expected baby was absolutely SICK, I repeat SICK.
Good night “all”, sweet dreams
August 30th, 2008 at 12:52 am
Night John Boy
August 30th, 2008 at 12:51 am
mmmmmm, all buggared off now on a friday night
goodnight all 
August 30th, 2008 at 12:46 am
jass, i’m getting tired now, i don’t think the evidence lies in photoshopping, i do think what might have been more the case is careful selection of photos. it takes a lot of skill to doctor photos so that it looks natural and, such can be detected by certain types of software far more expertly than what i can do or tell. all one has to do is load or scan the pictures into a program that checks for discrepancies in the pixel patterns. i think it’s possible to fool such programms, ie by multiple resizing and compressions, but do you think the doctors had such skills and the time to do such ?
August 30th, 2008 at 12:36 am
jo, goodnight, ear infection to the degree you’ve had is not good, take care.
August 30th, 2008 at 12:34 am
jass,
‘Can’t you see that M’s right leg is half missing?’
no i cannot see that madeleines leg is half missing, i can see she has one leg behind the other, what do you think a photo should look like if one leg is behind the other ?
‘Her knee just isn’t there? And her foot looks like a left-hand shoe has been stuck on.’
it looks okay to me, ive zoomed in and i can’t see anything dodgy.
‘Other threads have much more detail, about this and the photo-shopping of the other PdL playground shots that do not add up!’
yeah well i don’t know. i’ve looked at it and looked at it and just can’t see anything that cannot be explained by compression artifacts or isn’t normal. where do you get this 7ft idea from, people closer will look larger than people further away and if those people are closer to you than the building behind them they will look larger that the building,that doesn’t make them 7ft tall or the photo a fake.
August 30th, 2008 at 12:33 am
Jass
I dont think you can come to a conclusion like that, just from what you read, if you had spent time with the Mccanns, what you say might be more believeable.
August 30th, 2008 at 12:21 am
firestar, ubuntu eh ?
cool. 
and yes, no viruses and if you use the wine emulator you may not even have to boot into your windows partition. i like using the knoquerer web browser, you can split the screen and use one half for reply to comments and the other half for reading.