
Madeleine McCann: Stephanie Bysh And Ariella Encroach On Praia Da Luz
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
STEPHANIE Bysh is mother to Ariella d’Gama, who has passed a while in a children’s home.
What has it got to do with Madeleine McCann. Well, get this:
DAILY MAIL: “British mother whose daughter was taken into care by Portuguese police after she ‘went out drinking’”
A British man told police that her mother Stephanie Bysh, 44, had been ‘drinking heavily’… The town is five miles from Praia da Luz, where missing toddler Madeleine McCann disappeared in May last year from a rented apartment.
Yes, just five miles.
Yesterday, it was all just 15 miles from where our Maddie went missing.
The day before that it was all occuring 25 miles from Praia da Luz.
Anorak estimates that inside week, little Ariella will be actually inside the apartment used by the McCanns that fateful trip…
Such are the facts…
Posted: 29th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (952) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





August 30th, 2008 at 1:35 pm
bountyhunter Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
fair/secret, patch, totje, cool , and julie so far i cannot remember the others and yapmpy. if i have time will look for the others.
,dr watson and others bullied off here or attempted to be bullied off by afore
said bullies,
THIS FOR YOU ALL !!!!!! julie i thought you had more more character than to be snookered.
M and A
BH we have brought the matter up with Admin now, we had thought to allow the posts to run but after two weeks its getting nowhere fast, and time to stop the accusations
____________
BH, you are full of crap sorry about that! I’m sitting here laughing at the self-serving statement written above by you. Those are pros you listed as being the bullies and lamenting the fact Dr. Watson and a few others were bullied off or attempted to be bullied off posting on here . Interesting he is an anti and you chastise Julie by saying you thought she had more character than to be snookered!
I was watching the posting the other evening and you were outright horrendous in some of the statements you were making to Totje and a few other pros. Many pros who were really good posters on here with common sense and objective comments have left in disgust from here over the many months because of their treatment by the antis, who were permitted to get away with it. In fact, let’s face it, some of the antis are far more trashed mouthed than any pro has been and that includes Garth and Gandolf’s fukwits, etc., which are not overly offensive words. I admit I’ve used the “fuck off’ a few times but some of the gutter filth that comes out of some antis mouths on here has left me surprised that the whole sentences were not just blanked out by the Mods.
Got to get off as heading out for the weekend and running late so sorry I won’t be around to receive your self-righteous tirade.
August 30th, 2008 at 1:19 pm
i think the threads gone sour with all the bickering, i was deflated to see it being carried on this morning
Mods and Admin
So were we, Sam.
But its better to allow disgruntled people to air their views but it was becoming absurd indeed.
But the agenda is obvious now and disruption is the clear aim.
Hopefully we can get back to an unfortunate missing child and not ‘adult’ wallowing
August 30th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Jez
I do agree with you. Even the listening device seems to me a very lame way of taking care of such young kids, if you aren’t in the same building. But not going to see them from time to time is very hard to understand, as they all stressed it only took one minute to go to the appartments from the restaurant.
They were courting danger, all of them, not for themselves, but for their children. Of course they love their children, in that they have a feeling of love when they think of them, I am sure, it isn’t their feeling of love, but their feeling of responsability which leaves to be desired in my opinion.
What puzzles me is that they became so popular.
August 30th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Two bodies, as yet unidentified, found within remains of the arsoned house
near Oswestry.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/7589465.stm
August 30th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
At the very outset, I’m pretty sure GM stated/ blogged that the group had their “own listening method” – or suchlike. That gave rise to the suspicion of all the kids being in the same room together at night – with the Payne’s listening device being sufficient cover for the group.
With regard to the Payne statement, it beggars belief that they never checked the bedroom at all during the regular 2/3 hours away each night, relying on just an intercom. The kids were just one and two!!
Has Chaplins come up in any released statements as yet?
August 30th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
i am happy m& A
to let it go…..but ir seems the loudest howlers are the guiltiest .
M and A
Agreed, and they are also disrupting the thread
August 30th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
fair/secret, patch, totje, cool , and julie so far i cannot remember the others and yapmpy. if i have time will look for the others.
,dr watson and others bullied off here or attempted to be bullied off by afore
said bullies,
THIS FOR YOU ALL !!!!!! julie i thought you had more more character than to be snookered.
M and A
BH we have brought the matter up with Admin now, we had thought to allow the posts to run but after two weeks its getting nowhere fast, and time to stop the accusations
August 30th, 2008 at 11:58 am
See you later, Bountyhunter.
We are fighting for justice, for Madeleine, -but it might be too late for her- and mainly for all the children she represents, who are or could become the victims of grown-ups. It is important that the people who gave a tragic turn to her fate be found, and made accountable for what they did, and that all people who care about children understand that being in charge of an other human being is a sacred duty. We are just untrusted with our children by God (if he/she exists, which I am not sure of).
August 30th, 2008 at 11:48 am
To me, it seems obvious that doris isn’t Can’t Say No. They have different styles. Some posters have a characteristic way of expressing their personality through their choice of words, sentences, and even typing.
But even if they were the same person, does it matter? I like the anonimity of the site, it allows us to concentrate on the topic. It helps checking one’s beliefs to the light of others’ views. When the posters are turning the debate into a personal fight, it becomes an exhibition of “furiosity”. Quite amusing, but with the result that after a while, everyone gets tired and waits for a fresh start on the next thread.
M and A
Can’t say No was put on a permanent block many months ago after flooding Anorak with 3A links posts and 3A site info.
Doris is NOT CSN, and as far as I’m aware is a first time user name/ IP, and also is UK based unlike CSN whose English was rudimentary to say the least.
Julie claims that there is bullying on site , yes there is its a site hazard for any site especially open ones like Anorak, but if she wishes to complain about bullying its unfair of her to do the same to others.She has been given the opportunity many times to contact Admin, she chooses not to, but persists in posting about it….
Apologies for hijacking your post this way MN, you are not the cause of all this
August 30th, 2008 at 11:34 am
marie Nicholas
Glad to see you 1
THANKS FOR TRANSLATIONS , oBRIGADO !!
learning Portugese now,
I have a copy of Mr Amarals book and a Portugeuse translator for the week-end.
He says please ignore all time line statements by the 7 or 9
the truth of the lie is in the book, what happenned to the clothes (garments) M wore on the last day ?
all whooshe clunked !! washed or worse ??
we must go to lunch.
MN i have never, never maimed any animal. we hunt yes, but all our female buck are carrying now, we had an early spring ? but expecting snow tonight and big freeze Sunday. please stay with Coco and Jo, they are with M.
AS YOU ARE, CHATELAINE AND Chenier and mods will try to post tonight if possible.
August 30th, 2008 at 11:16 am
Hi BountyHunter!
August 30th, 2008 at 11:09 am
You there Julie?
August 30th, 2008 at 11:02 am
never clasp asp/s to you bosom.
rule no 1.
Doris is not ca’nt say no, or any other person you tried to get rid of Julie, look inside you 5 or so cronies, the real trouble makers here, you know who they are, M&A know who they are, and we all know they are.
Now get over yourself and your angst.
start mentioning Madeleine.
August 30th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Daisy Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 9:25 am
I wasn’t referring to Dr K in the light of being, as you say, “at the front of the accusations”.
I was taking cognisance of several of the McCann side of the family making us
aware in various press cuttings of Dr K’s tendency to explode into incadescent
rages, episodes of furiosity and smashing up of apartments etc.
Nice family to be related to. NOT
Dr K…..watch your back.
August 30th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Jass
Have you seen all of Madeleines pics?? In most of them she is dressed beautifully, do you always look well dressed every day!!!!!!!!!!
Julie
It was great to read your posts recently with Garth, about time there was abit of humor on Anorak
August 30th, 2008 at 9:25 am
Matt,
I agree with you that the one that has more to lose, not only legally but also in the eyes of the World, is the mother, since she has been the one at the front of all “accusations”, etc.
I believe she is the second victim in this saga. Can’t help but think that hubby (and maybe one or two more) has some knowledge of what really happened.
August 30th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Daisy , codswallop .I am telling the truth , I swear on my childs life ,
August 30th, 2008 at 9:18 am
Good morning to all.
Daisy Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 8:51 am
“”What if the parents are being kept in the dark? I believe the mother is NOT in
the know of what might have really happen to the child, but I have my doubts
about some others in the group”".
That implies that Dr G P has not “kept in the dark”.
So “a parent is being kept in the dark” may be more applicable.
I have doubts about all of them to varying degrees.
I suspect that both parents are very aware of what happened.
I would also hazard that if ever the going gets really tough Legally, then Dr K
will be the one who is sarcrificed as the patsy.
August 30th, 2008 at 9:17 am
A simple little word of wisdom for anyone using the internet forums, blogs, etc.
There is no way (or at least little chance of) anybody knowing who the other posters are. Some may claim to be ex-cops, some my say they are Judges, some may claim that they are “in the know”, etc. etc. Please, please, people, wake up and realize that anybody can claim to be anybody and you should not believe it.
I don’t understand the multi-posting that some do, or why some emphatically assure us that they know something about something and that things are happening behind the scenes, etc. etc.
It would be great if this investigation is somehow not dormant and that somebody with some power either in the UK or Portugal is continuing to look for the truth. But are they amongst the people that post here? I seriously doubt it!
August 30th, 2008 at 9:17 am
if you were right i wouldnt have replied ! am off now for day out , will try and refrain from being here as i feel i am about to burst , have a nice day everyone
August 30th, 2008 at 9:14 am
doris, if I guess right you wouldn’t say so anyway would you?
Back to the drawing board ….
August 30th, 2008 at 9:11 am
julie , no !
August 30th, 2008 at 9:04 am
I’ve just read through …. think I’d better clear something up here.
Regarding my post on the first page of this thread, which I did last night about cyber-bullying and the previous thread.
Most of the posters assumed I was referring directly to Coco in my post - I WAS NOT! (Apologies Coco if they did assume this, but jumping to conclusions is not a healthy habit!)
Cyber-bullying on the site, where everyone can see is pathetic and disgusting and shouldn’t be allowed! Cyber-bullying beyond this site is abnormal and should be seen as a criminal act - those who do this should be seen as the dangerous ones …..
Jass, if my “horsing around” with Garth or “getting off with him???” as you put it bugs you so much - I suggest you take a chill pill and sleep it off for a few hours - I couldn’t care less what bugs you about my posts! I’m honoured that you bothered to take any notice of any of my posts …..
I was here for one reason alone - I want to see justice done for Madeleine - it was a nice place to be because there was humour in amongst the sadness of the situation. Do I still believe there will be justice for Madeleine - YES I DO!
Doris - you asked if anyone could guess who you are - I think you are the poster who called themself “Can’t Say No” in a previous life!
Have a lovely day everyone.
*************
Mods and Admin
Until you either name the bully or stop talking about him /her you are disrupting the thread. You have subjected Coco to night of bullying and very unpleasant for her too then you come in and lob another grenade ‘Oh its not Coco’ so we have another 12 hours until you say its not them?
August 30th, 2008 at 8:51 am
I see that Madame Justice Coco is at it again.
Can posters here for one moment look at this from a different angle than “the parents did it” kind of thing? What if it was someone else in the group that caused all this? What if the parents are being kept in the dark? I believe the mother is NOT in the know of what might have really happen to the child, but I have my doubts about some others in the group.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:38 am
Just found this. A poster yesterday or the day before asked why the PJ didn’t get Madeleine’s DNA from her other clothes. Is this why? It appears Kate was busy washing clothes and managed to wash at least one load before forensics turned up .lol.
Here are transcripts from the Panorama programme from the McCann files.
JON CORNER: Well this is the bizarre thing Richard because the police said to Kate and Gerry: “Yeah, we’re going to be coming along, we want to do some forensics.” And Kate and Gerry were massively optimistic about this. You’ve got to remember if your daughter is missing and the police phone you and say: “We want to do some forensics, that’s a straw that you hang onto. That’s a moment for optimism.
- Just earlier Corner had said this:
CORNER: They took most of their clothing, they were taking even the wet clothes out of the washing machine. I was aware that the cuddlecat was boxed up and we were asked to leave the villa.
Washing what would be vital evidence. Thats taking the piss.lol. I wonder what the washed items were?
August 30th, 2008 at 8:20 am
Rasputin Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 8:07 am
I treat you as nothing, you or your opinions have no bearing in the greater scheme of things.
…. And I, my dear sir/madam will always think of you as an “Anus Trip”.
Sorry to rattle you
August 30th, 2008 at 8:14 am
After coco fired a few well placed fucks into certain individuals the rest suddenley appear.Cages suitably rattled, they fall over themselves to dig an even deeper hole. Hopefully when it is filled in they will be at the botom of it.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:08 am
NOTE TO ALL POSTERS!
Don’t give this Rasputin character any band-width - there is something very very poignant in the public domain but not in the UK!
Any sly fuckers like Totje, the CuckooClam and Professor Pam are just sitting ducks for all this. The haven’t got a clue how to write satircal stuff an dpeople will come unstuck - so avoid them.
And just before I go or get banned - Fuck, Twat, Sh*t,C*nt, Bastard and Buggery!
I love all of you lovely ones like the BountyHunter Babes and St Marie Nicholas, Jass, Darling Jo, Lone Pigeon, Chatelaine etc etc etc - but all the rest of them are Fuck-Wits and Half-Wits in my judgement of their irate and pathetic postings - and I state that categorically!
August 30th, 2008 at 8:07 am
I treat you as nothing, you or your opinions have no bearing in the greater scheme of things.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:03 am
Rasputin Says:
August 30th, 2008 at 8:00 am
You are as usual mistaken, …….
You treat me like you treat dogs?