Madeleine McCann: Stephanie Bysh And Ariella Encroach On Praia Da Luz
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
STEPHANIE Bysh is mother to Ariella d’Gama, who has passed a while in a children’s home.
What has it got to do with Madeleine McCann. Well, get this:
DAILY MAIL: “British mother whose daughter was taken into care by Portuguese police after she ‘went out drinking’”
A British man told police that her mother Stephanie Bysh, 44, had been ‘drinking heavily’… The town is five miles from Praia da Luz, where missing toddler Madeleine McCann disappeared in May last year from a rented apartment.
Yes, just five miles.
Yesterday, it was all just 15 miles from where our Maddie went missing.
The day before that it was all occuring 25 miles from Praia da Luz.
Anorak estimates that inside week, little Ariella will be actually inside the apartment used by the McCanns that fateful trip…
Such are the facts…
Posted: 29th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (952) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
- yampster on Dundee Woman Accused Of Ripping Out Lover’s Testes With Her Bare Hands
- KathyM on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- Desperate Dan on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- Desperate Dan on The 14 Ten Most Offensive Google Search Results
August 29th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Doris are you the abductor?
Or mrs Fenn?
== sorry only joking
August 29th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
whoops , no better than that
August 29th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
And guess who got zapped without using the foul language someone else spouted?
Now is that ironical or satirical?
All Goes Well they seem to think…..
Wonder who’s the next victim
++++
Julie
Btw did you read the whole last thread?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Doris-are you the editor of the Daily Star?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:26 pm
I will make myself known if allowed and I am not stokes or anyones aunty , I dont know wht i post here as many of you will agree ! but i dont care as i know what is going to happen and anorak and the press should have known better - all due respect to mods etc but not press !
August 29th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
The Real Stig-What gets me is that M&A seem to think her insulting behaviour is acceptable and amusing IMO.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Jass… why did you sign yourself ‘ I ‘ ?
surely not Ian eh? surely not…….
August 29th, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Totje Says:
“Stiggie you’d better watch out!”
Oh I know. It would be a lot safer if I was to just swear at everyone and call them F-Wit in every second sentence. You are certainly safe from censure if you adopt that course it seems. Try a bit of satire and it’s wooosh clunk.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:17 pm
What is happening to this site, where are those conspicuous by their absence.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:14 pm
hmm not sure if I made myself clear. But you’ll see….
August 29th, 2008 at 8:14 pm
Thanx Totje … chat tomorrow
August 29th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
And btw well said Julie.
Stiggie you’d better watch out!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Doris,
I join you in loathing garth 103%.
He’s isn’t funny, or clever. Never was and never will be.
He has spent 15 months playing ther MCann advocate, for reasons best known to himself, and writing rubbish he doesn’t remotely believe in.
Hot & Bothered and Totje and Julie might think he’s hilarious…but he’s an evil conman.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Marie N
I don’t agree with you. Ignoring the bullies or ignoring the bullying doesn’t solve the problem. They go on and on and on. And inevitably they hurt people. Because that’s what they are after!
Do you ignore it when you see someone torture a cat, dog, child?
Don’t think so.
Words can even hurt more then a knife.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Doris Stokes?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:03 pm
Please doris, say more.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Julie,
No, I meant “precious”.
It’s a well-known term for someone being a bit over-fussy/over-sensitive about things.
I really sometimes feel puky about the way you chat up the vile garth and vice versa, especially for someone so “precious”.
I much prefer coco’s no-hold-bars posting.
At least she doesn’t try to play both sides to the middle.
I
August 29th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
My Aunty?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
doris Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
julie are you missing garth ? !
______________________
No …. he’s around!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
doris
Can you say more please? What sort of action is going to be taken and by whom? Just be a little bit more specific.
August 29th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
julie are you missing garth ? !
August 29th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
no not to you , you are so clever who am i ?
August 29th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
Ah go on Doris.. identify yourself. Go on go on go on…
August 29th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
Julie
Ignoring the bullies is the best way of dealing with them, according to me. They can’t do much harm as long as all they can do is post, and every one on the site can read their posts and see how stupid they are. Not a big deal according to me. Lone pigeon is right to give it a stop, though,and I agree with you we miss Noseycow, Duncan and Carmen very much. But there are still plenty of interesting posters. If you dont post on this site any more, Julie, you leave the ground to people who are less intereting than you.
August 29th, 2008 at 7:55 pm
jass Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Julie,
You’re being a bit precious.
____________________________
Do you actually mean precocious? I’ve no idea how to spell it, but I assume that’s what you mean. I’m precious to those who love me …….
August 29th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Sorry Jass, but IMO the Rooster was a model of decorum in comparison to some of the posters who are rampaging at the moment!
General manners shouldn’t take sides. I’ve disagreed with many here and of course they have with me but the majority don’t stoop to some of the personal stuff going around right now.
IMO its bad for Anorak.
August 29th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
I would like to identify myself but dont think i shall be allowed , mark my words action is being taken and some - only some would wish they had been involved , God bless Madeleine and I promise justice will be done
August 29th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Julie
Good evening Julie
My first post well 90% of it - was modded right out of existence. It was both satirical and allegorical, but Artemis Foul took exception to it because - shock horror - it had S&M references.
Could you just confirm something for me please Julie. I seem to recall you and Garth mentioning whips - and the use thereof - in some of your spirited exchanges. That did happen didn’t it? I’m not imagining it?
August 29th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
what a shame the posters wont be around to see developments especially girly garth , anorak someone has made bad decision i fear and i do know what i am talking about
August 29th, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Julie,
You’re being a bit precious.
The site hasn’t suddenly gone downhill.
It was pretty downhill when it was infested by a hideous piece of work named Red Rooster…whose swearing, bullying and general offensiveness Garth seems eager to perpetuate.