Madeleine McCann: Stephanie Bysh And Ariella Encroach On Praia Da Luz
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
STEPHANIE Bysh is mother to Ariella d’Gama, who has passed a while in a children’s home.
What has it got to do with Madeleine McCann. Well, get this:
DAILY MAIL: “British mother whose daughter was taken into care by Portuguese police after she ‘went out drinking’”
A British man told police that her mother Stephanie Bysh, 44, had been ‘drinking heavily’… The town is five miles from Praia da Luz, where missing toddler Madeleine McCann disappeared in May last year from a rented apartment.
Yes, just five miles.
Yesterday, it was all just 15 miles from where our Maddie went missing.
The day before that it was all occuring 25 miles from Praia da Luz.
Anorak estimates that inside week, little Ariella will be actually inside the apartment used by the McCanns that fateful trip…
Such are the facts…
Posted: 29th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (952) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
August 29th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
doris
In what way will justice be done?
August 29th, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Sam,
yes, suprising that Fiona Payne claimed she’s never been into the McCann apartment!
yet they were all such “chums” and one would imagine them all popping in and out to each others flats during this friends’ holiday.
Did the McCanns hold themselves aloof?
Or were the others in some way aloof from them?
August 29th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
Tosh Jo you’re cheating again!
August 29th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Pam-who is allegedly psychotic? Worrying that not only one springs to mind!!!! A few to choose from!
August 29th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
doris
It”s like twenty questions, got me interested now!!!!!!!
If the McCanns and NSU get investigated for fraud, IMO that”s the only thing that can happen now, sadly I cannot believe Madeleine is alive and the case is closed as far as I”m concerned.
So come on, give us a clue!!!!!!
August 29th, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Marie Nicholas
Do you remember that woman that got stalked and attacked by her former friend [I forgot his name]. Going on an on how bad a single mother was to raise a child?
Do you remember the friend of Christine, Ann? She got stalked and scared away by another poster.
I could go on like that for a while.
Some strange creatures seem to get for some strange reasons an obsession with another poster and stalk and attack him/her/them. You’re just lucky so far it hasn’t been you.
Who’s next?
Who’s to stop the freaks?
Heated debate is fine. Fun even.
Abuse isn’t.
August 29th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
justice will be done
August 29th, 2008 at 9:17 pm
Elvera Says:
—————————————————————————-
I agree….some people who post on here have very strange values imo…..they get upset with a few “anglo saxon” expletives yet think the vile tales of animal cruelty as espoused by Garth for the last few days as ‘playful banter’….mind boggling to say the least!
- and it was entirely acceptable to choose to use abusive terminology re. the uselessness of the’ empty’ ‘cunt’ in relation to Kate McCann and IVF treatment
August 29th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
doris
Do you think a happy ending is going to come as regards Madeleine’s plight, then?
August 29th, 2008 at 9:13 pm
jass, yes, that is the phrase kate used, ’so into each other’ but the behaviour was differnt, each family went theirown way in the daytime, none sofar knew what the childrens bedroom looked like, or hadn’t been into it and so on.
August 29th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
Totje
You asked me if I ignored it when I saw someone torture an animal or a child, that ’s why I said it was completely different on the site, as I don’t think the word applied to people quarelling, even toughly, on a forum!
I don’t think we can be too fragile if we are willing to post on a debating site. We know that it will get heated at times, and that some debaters are going to be rude or unpleasant, but I think when they do that, they show themselves for what they are, and ignoring them when they attack me isn’t indifference to other people’s miseries on my part I think. I must say I have been seldom attacked, but it happened, and I took it as part of the game.
But I can understand that some posters get upset, especially someone who is expecting a child, and who doesn’t need to be sent horrid things about her baby. I found it sadistic, and she was right to react the way she did, according to me.
August 29th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
marie nicholas
no absolutely not
August 29th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
Pam,
Very few people have the slightest interest or belief in anything Jane Tanner has to say.
More interesting at the moment is that none of the Tapas crew admits to seeing Madeleine on May 3.
For some reason, they all seem to have distanced themselves from the McCanns for the whole day, despite Kate’s belief that they were “so into each other.”
Even David and Fiona Payne, from their statements, don’t seem to remember David calling in on Kate, in her towel, and her children “looking like angels” at around 6.30pm on May 3.
August 29th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
‘espoused’?….sorry, that should read spouted…don’t know where that other word came from!
August 29th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
A FEW? I mean, I use the F* word as well. It’s multipurpose. But to see it as a noun, verb, adjective, adverb, and object in the same sentence, until it all runs together in babbling incoherence??? There’s only one girl/ boy crazy enough for THAT job.
August 29th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Pamela who is psychotic-I’ve lost the plot!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:59 pm
No-it is just wholly unnacceptable from whoever-and I wasn’t even addressing a comment to her-it was actually none of her business. If she can’t hold an adult conversation she shouldn’t try to interefre with people who want to hold one.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
jass Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Julie,
No, I meant “precious”.
It’s a well-known term for someone being a bit over-fussy/over-sensitive about things.
I really sometimes feel puky about the way you chat up the vile garth and vice versa, especially for someone so “precious”.
I much prefer coco’s no-hold-bars posting.
At least she doesn’t try to play both sides to the middle.
—————————————————————————-
I agree….some people who post on here have very strange values imo…..they get upset with a few “anglo saxon” expletives yet think the vile tales of animal cruelty as espoused by Garth for the last few days as ‘playful banter’….mind boggling to say the least!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
It has nothing to do with gender. He or she is–alledgedly–psychotic.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
No whoops, I don’t.
But it’s no worse than the sort of insults Garth has sprayed around for months, or his doppleganger Red Rooster.
Is it worse because it’s from a female (coco)?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:54 pm
AZ, oh, for heaven’s sake! The man’s testimony is now there for everyone to see. He says he left home between 8:15 and 8:30 and saw Gerry between 8:45 and 9:15. Your positioning of this at 9:10 is based on JANE TANNER’S testimony that this is when she left the restaurant and saw them in the street.
We have been told sundown was at roughly 8:30.
He could see color, but she could not. She couldn’t see bundleman, but if Wilkins didn’t see HER, she wasn’t there. Effing CHOOSE one–you can’t have it both ways!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
Marie Nicholas
“We can reply, we can ignore, or we can walk away in order not to become victims. I think torture is a really big word for what it is.”
I didn’t say it’s torture. I say words can hurt too.
Walking away is what the bully wants.
Read at the forums what Jullie wrote or Richard and the links he’s put up.
Ignoring the bad things that are going on causes the indifference that’s common nowadays.
Remember Bob Marley? Get up, stand up!
August 29th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Jass-i don’t find a stranger calling me a fuck-wit clever or amusing-do you?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Thanks mrsaudley,
I feel sickened by posters who claim he is amusing, or fun, or entertaining.
What is their game?
Julie’s interest in him is particularly baffling.
Why would she want to get off with such an ugly-minded bottom-feeder as garth?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
doris
You have made me really curious. Why do you say Anork and the press shoud have known better? Doyou mean they are going to be sued?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Totje
When an animal is tortured, it is because it can’t escape. Here, no torture is possible, as it is only words, and in a small circle where we are on equal termes with no real identities.
We can reply, we can ignore, or we can walk away in order not to become victims. I think torture is a really big word for what it is.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
Meanwhile, in between Julie being precious and Stig being sanctimonious, what about SGB’s idea that the airport/airport bus videos could be cons?
As in, if the Payne daughters were only babies, (one and two years old at the time) who is the biggish girl walking up the plane steps with Madeleine, and sitting beside her on the bus?
Madeleine wasn’t the midget the McCanns tried to imply, over and over.
She WASN’T the size of a 2-yr-old….so why would she seem to be the same size as the elder Payne daughter on those videos?
August 29th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
jass Says:
August 29th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
Doris,
I join you in loathing garth 103%.
He’s isn’t funny, or clever. Never was and never will be.
He has spent 15 months playing ther MCann advocate, for reasons best known to himself, and writing rubbish he doesn’t remotely believe in.
Hot & Bothered and Totje and Julie might think he’s hilarious…but he’s an evil conman
———————————————————————————————————–
I really couldn’t agree more, infact I avoid reading anything the idiot writes.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Whoops
Not only that but they actively protect her. My infamous post that was made to disappear was aimed squarely at Coco. I was terribly disappointed that she didn’t get to see it.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Hot & Bothered.
I am so BORED with your seeming obsession with the idea that I am Ian.
I have said three, four, five times - in answer to your boring hints and nudges - that I’m not.
Ian would be flattered that you can’t stop thinking every other poster is him.
If you remember, Ian’s big thing was the “child neglect” issue.
My big issue is that they are guilty of something much worse.