Sarah Palin’s Down’s Baby Not Hers
IT’S 3am and Sarah Palin is wondering if abortion should be legalised.. for the mothers of left wingers at the Daily Kos:
But it appears that Pallin’s last child, a baby with Down’s syndrome, may not be hers. It may be that of her teenage daughter.
A Kostic soul.
Trig is not Sarah’s son, but grandson. It was her 16-year-old daughter Bristol (pictured right) who was carrying. (80% of the cases of Down’s Syndrome are in mothers under the age of 35.)
And what percentage of women give birth under the age of 35?
Tina Fey… Calling Tina Fey…
Posted: 31st, August 2008 | In: John McCain, Politicians, Race For The White House, Sarah Palin, Twitterings Comments (15) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- eggman on Michelle Thompson Orgasms 300 Times Every Day, Video
- Harry Hill on Katie Price Should Marry Samantha Fox To Give Her Kids A Better Start In Life, Research Says
- June on Michelle Thompson Orgasms 300 Times Every Day, Video
- June on Strictly Come Dancing Fans Demand Bruce Forsyth Returns
- eggman on Michelle Thompson Orgasms 300 Times Every Day, Video
October 6th, 2008 at 4:24 am
I believe that Bristol is the mother to Trig. The reason is because of her actions when she was pregnant. I am a nurse and I know the problems that can happen after the water has broken. The mother is in labor after the amniotic fluid is released. A mother should get right to the hospital. It is hard to imagine that she could have given a speech then go for 8 hours to Alaska. After arriving in Anchorage she then went another 40 miles to Wassella. She should have gone to the nearest hospital in Texas. People that saw her give the speech were unaware that she was pregnant. How could that be? She was bigger than a house when expecting Piper. Why risk the babies life by going that distance? Downs babys are ofter born with a hole in their hearts and difficulity breathing. She went to a small town ill equipped hospital to have this babe??? Why didn’t Sarah tell her parents and sister she was pregnant until the last month of pregnancy? Could it be that Bristol was the pregnant one and Bristol did not tell her mother in the early months of her pregnancy that she was expecting?? Bristol would only have been 16 and only in the 10th grade. Why was Bristol missing from school for 6 months? Maybe they were waiting to see if the baby was going to really live. Downs babys born to teens often don’t pull through. If Sarah is the babies mother was she hoping that the baby would die right after birth? She may have felt that if the baby died at birth it would only be Gods will and not her falt for not having him in a large metropolitan hospital. This woman has very strange ideas and we may all be in for a shock after the election. The truth has got to come out sometime. I do not trust this family they are far from conservative.
Bristol and Levi with their tattoos and drinking. The guns all around and pictures with the kids all drinking etc. Sex by 16 years and parents that think this behavior is OK. This is not conservitive. Mothers don’t claim they wear only skirts and dresses because the Bible tells them to and then address a church in a mini skirt 4 inches above the knee. Polin must think she is real cute. She told a reporter in Alaska that she wears glasses instead of contacts because it helps the men to concentrate on what she is saying and not her looks. Talk about vanity??????!!!!!!!!
September 5th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
I agree that the baby is not Sarah’s. It was supposedbly born one-month premature, meaning it should have been placed in a neo-natal intensive care unit for preemies. Yet after 3 days, it was out of the hospital being shown off to the public. Moreover, it was born after labor was induced. Why induce labor for a premature birth? Not credible. And leaving aside questions of family values, not good for a politician who is running on a platform of transparency.
—-
M&A
Artemis
It was reported that labour was induced because Sarah Palin’s waters had broken; that is standard practise.
And there is no point in keeping a perfectly healthy baby in hospital because hospitals are the places where you are most likely to acquire a multi-resistant infection.
September 5th, 2008 at 5:13 am
Sarah Palin can not prove she was pregnant by saying her daughter is now pregnant - the girl could be pregnant again, couldn’t she? Why doesn’t Palin produce a birth certificate. Why doesn’t a nurse or doctor in the delivery room come forward and confirm Sarah Palin gave birth? One of her daughters had that baby. Her exposed breasts this evening were not consistent with breast-feeding. This is not the party of family values. In Dayton Ohio McCain kept tugging at his wedding ring while oogling Palin’s breasts. Is he considering another divorce for another beauty queen? They trot out the handicapped baby and the pregnant unmarried teenagers to further their own political careers with no concern in the world for the psychological damage this could cause the family and the millions of impressionable teens watching. They’ve got Cindy dressed like Barbara Bush while Palin is dressed like a bad nightclub act. . This circus is an insult to the American people. The media, Obama, Biden and the Clintons owe it the American people to protect and save us from this trainwrek of a freak show.
sloctroc Sep-4
September 5th, 2008 at 2:46 am
I think the baby is not hers but why is this not in the main streem media??????
September 3rd, 2008 at 11:09 pm
I think she is not telling the truth!!!! I do believe the baby is not hers. Also, going back to work just 3 days later is more proof that the baby is not hers. No mother would leave a special needs baby just 3 days after birth! It will come out after the election that she was just tring to protect ther daughter (what any wonderful mom would do) and many people will fall for that and praise her for being such a wonderful mother!
Fact: Sarah hid her possible pregnancy for 7 months
Fact: People never new she was pregnant for 7 months
Fact: Even close people to her had know idea
Fact: Her daughter was absent for school for a very long time while her mother was hiding her pregnancy.
Fact: 7 months pregnant and airplane rides are dangerous at best!
Fact: Sarah chose to take the long plane ride while 7 months pregnant.
Fact: The baby was born in a hospital in Sarah’s neck of the woods where she has much control over keeping things private.
Fact: Her daughter is pregnant right now!
Fact: The baby has downs syndrome
Fact: Mothers show quicker after they have had previous children.
Wake up america!!! Do your homework don’t take anybodys word for the truth. Search out for the truth for yourself.
September 3rd, 2008 at 9:41 pm
Sarah Palin has a hot and naughty daughter. That will take the both of them far in Washinton.
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:04 am
If everyone had seen the photos on dailyKos along with the commentary, there would be no doubt that the baby belonged to the daughter. Sarah, looking slim and trim at her supposed 7 months pregnancy (no facial change), and photos of the daughter with a bulging stomach. Another photo of Sarah from an earlier pregnancy showed a face influenced by pregnancy and a very large pregnant stomach. All the photos were dated.
September 1st, 2008 at 5:31 pm
okay, the baby is sarah’s. but why would they not announce that she had a bundle of joy on the way. sarah loves the more the merrier. they celebrate everthying else that is merry in their lives. why not say and my beautiful daughter who will bring a lovely addition to the family . . . why not? i’m sure if she was married she would have said this!
September 1st, 2008 at 5:21 pm
i will add from above, the simpliest explanation is likely — a downs child is the mother’s. but boy, if there have ever been coincidences and questions — i don’t know, but i wonder.
September 1st, 2008 at 5:19 pm
any cop would believe sarah to be guilty based on the number of coincidences. nothing is conclusive though — the so called “hiking” video, pictures, fluid leak story, etc. let me fuel the flames though and add two more tid bits . . . like everything else these can easily be rationalized away — why is the eldest daughter almost exclusively holding the child? no one else holds the child recently etc. the other daughter isn’t that young. the eldest daughter looks quite adoringly at the child. okay flimsy. in the picture of the family with bristol’s bump indoors, do you notice she is the only family member with a closed mouth? not relevant. okay.
finally, why isn’t there a conclusive picture if sarah believes more is the merrier? maybe to not seem unprofessional, but not one picture??? not one picture from the family of the year mother??? all of the oddities will hopefully be known in a day or two because i’m afraid of the liberal bloggers bringing out mad conservative votes and money. i will add that there was no vetting process in any substantial sense and this does go to mccain’s judgement. palin’s judgement is under scrutiny if she thought she could get away with it; especially, if she didn’t tell mccain’s staff. admittedly, if this was a family matter, i’d think it was okay. but i’ve read police reports, a palin email, stories on troopergate; the bridge; audio and video of her acting poorly towards others in media outlets . . . she’s should have never been selected.
September 1st, 2008 at 5:14 pm
Bring on the DNA testing and let’s put this to rest once and for all!
September 1st, 2008 at 11:44 am
The higher percentage of Down’s babies born to younger mums is only because older mums are offered amniocentesis testing.
Naturally, the risks increase dramatically with age of the mother. There has recently been a link to older fathers also.
With reagrd to Sarah palin… if the baby was born to the daughter and had not been aborted then why the secrecy? If she is pro-life and anti-aboirtion then surely that was the right choice? To have the baby? Far more acceptable than to pretend otherwise.
Doesn’t make sense to me…….. seems like another urban myth.
September 1st, 2008 at 8:39 am
Why don’t we let the facts come to light before we dismiss this story outright? It very well could be true and believable. The timeline makes sense, the story makes sense, the motive for a cover-up makes sense too: Anti-sex education Governor and possible VP Nominee’s own daughter becomes pregnant at age 16… hmmm… that can’t be good for the governor can it?
September 1st, 2008 at 12:19 am
Pam, I don’t know why you do not think it is true, but it sure fits the bill. None of the actions that Ms. Palin took when her water broke were that of a mother. Your first thought would not be to get be to Alaska (HELLO, from TEXAS!!), it would be to make sure that the child would be in no danger. This story reeks of truth. And honestly, I would so like to say that it isn’t anyone’s business. BUT, it is. This is a woman who is running for an office that will put her in the president’s shoes with one heart attack. There is no way that any part of her life is not up for reveiw. Thank goodness for her that HIPPA exists. I doubt it will be long before proof is out. Yes, it does show that she is willing to prtotect her daughter at all costs…or does it show that she is so vain that this would simply not reflect well enough on her. Where I live we have a large and in charge pediatrician that is very vocal about being pro-life. Until, that is, until I performed an exam on his way too young daughter confirming her pregnancy. Let’s have a show of hands…how many people believe she delivered?? And how many believe she walked away from the ER that day no lnger pregnant????
Oh yeah, she walked alone…..
Rdiculous the double standar. And apparentyl when it comes to Palin, this is not the first time that she has side stepped for herself the lip that she gives everyone else. Her political platform was “transparency” in politics. Well, that is until she went under investigation for abuse of power after firing a man for NOT firing her ex - brother in law.
That’s an on-going one…..
MODS and ADMIN.
Grace
And therefore not currently part of the discussion we wish to have.
August 31st, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Oh, I wish this was true, but–sadly–no.