
Madeleine McCann: The Bill, Durham Police And Gary Glitter Is Paedos’ ‘Our Maddie’
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
DAILY MIRROR: “Maddy cops vetoed Brit help offer”
But British police have assisted in the McCann case. No?
Portuguese police turned down an offer to help find Madeleine McCann from Britain’s most senior murder investigator, it has emerged.
Emerged?
Durham Chief Constable John Stoddart wanted to send a team of elite detectives to Praia da Luz after she went missing in 2007. But Stoddart, chair of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ Homicide Working Group, was “disappointed” when the Policia Judiciaria vetoed the idea.
Well, they did have their own men on the job. And what has Durham to do with the case?
He said: “I would like to have sent a team out there to provide some support to the investigation team. I’m disappointed that we couldn’t help out. I think we would have provided some expert advice and support.”
Durham, where all crimes are cleared up. Says the Home Office: Type of crime: “Missing Persons”. Performance: “Fair”. Not good. Not excellent. Fair.
Says the McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell:
“It is not surprising. However, our own investigations continue and we are following up several leads.”
More on those to follow…
THE GUARDIAN: “How the gang turned on Gary”
Since I never liked the look (still less the music) of Glitter anyway, I’m not even going to try. But popular hatred, once aroused, can be hard to control. The Sun implicitly invited readers to look out for Gadd, asking for pictures of him “out and about”. The false sightings could exceed those of Madeleine McCann.
I see him in my nightmares…
THE INDEPENDENT: “The Bill: Britain’s most famous television police drama is almost an industry in its own right”
Young says those who watch The Bill identify with its characters in a more “real” way than they do with those of other series. He adds that the scriptwriting team is currently debating how far they can go with a story about post-natal depression. “You’d be really cautious about something directly related to, say, [the disappearance of] Madeleine McCann,” he adds. “We have a constant dialogue with people at ITV to make sure there is no cross over. To see such a thing regurgitated in a drama looks cheap and exploitative. It is unnecessary. You would even be cautious telling something where the names were changed.”
Missing kids. Now that’s entertainment…
Posted: 1st, September 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Celebrities, Madeleine McCann, TV & Radio, Tabloids Comments (508) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 2nd, 2008 at 10:43 am
Not sure if I should reply in this thread or in the new one.
I’m in a hurry as usual, as I don’t like to get up early…
==
Hi Marie N
No way anybody could feel bad about the story unless they’d have a doubt in their own mind if what they’re doing/did is right.
May be in time someone will explain to you why I posted it.
But you’re right let’s forget about it.
I do however agree with [a lot of] Stiggies post.
+++++++++
Thanks Châtelaine for posting that video. grrrr
Listening to this beautiful french comment makes me long to be back in France.
Some languages like French and Italian for instance sound much more elegant as the blunt Dutch imo.
+++++
==> gone off to work
September 2nd, 2008 at 8:00 am
New thread X
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:48 am
Good Morning Matt. and Willo! Lovely day already.
Just catching up on the posts again. Thank God I wasn’t here yesterday.
I note at least two Garseholes were trying to shove the feeble posters up a one-way street again! Ten out of ten for the perseverance!
Ten out of ten to the Commentariat for persistence in making him/s disappear up his/their own back-sides a time or two! lol
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:44 am
OLA! Hello! We haven’t met before. It is frightening to think these thoughts - but you are definitely right.
Many posters on Anorak agree whole-heartedly that we are in the middle period of the erasing of democratic freedoms as we once knew them. Where will it all end?
I think it will end when the drug companies have taken over the World and either starved us to death or gently eased us all into a passive herd.
Please God - Let the Pams, Clams and Garseholes and Real Stinks be dumbed-down first!!!
I hope to see you post more often. My posts are mainly unintelligible to the English - so don’t worry if you can’t understand mine
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:33 am
Good Morning Chatelaine! To start the old discussion indeed. On what morning, afternoon, evening or night.
Can’t wait to see the next load of Statements! Got a big day today so I will miss it all again. I seee that a lot of things got thrashed out yesterday.
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:32 am
Châtelaine Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:25 am
Good morning, Châtelaine.
I didn’t wish to be overly controversial.
Good morning, Coco….also.
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:29 am
Gandolf Says:
September 1st, 2008 at 9:40 pm
Gandolf is the master of fear, slayer of fukwits and poodle talkers, woof woof my arse……..
GONAD LF - You are a gonad without a doubt. Master of fear - my arse!
Here follows a report on Professor Pam Pending. -
Professor Pam Pending needs to read around the chosen subject with more objectivity. She has difficulty in reading the Statements of Witnesses. (She consistently refuses the help from many poster-graduates.)
Professor Pam Pending demonstrates a desperate need for attention and tends to repeat herself when the debating group fails to respond to her.
As her Monitor, I am concerned that some of the brighter poster-graduates are at a complete loss to understand her dreadfully vague communications. This causes much consternation and mockery within the group as a whole.
To date she is unable to provide adequate sourcing of her information.
I am therefore unable to allow her graduation to a Half-Wit at this current time.
I have decided to keep her as an F grade in the Wit charts.
I am not hopeful that she will ever be able to make a grade higher than this in the near future.
I would ask that she try to observe the rest of the group without butting-in on all the serious points of The Statements that the rest of the group are trying to ascertain.
In conclusion, I would ask that PPP must try very much harder.
ps Professor Pam Pending. Please read some Charles Dickens. Powerfully observatory stuff. Then you can be Professor Pam Pending of the Pertinent!
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:25 am
Matt. Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:13 am
More importantly, who was the last totally independent person to see
Madeleine alive and well, and at what time ?
***
Or which date, to re-start an old discussion?
Good morning
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:13 am
More importantly, who was the last totally independent person to see
Madeleine alive and well, and at what time ?
September 2nd, 2008 at 7:10 am
Were they asked? No, the statements describe their decision to visit Portugal, their routine while there, and the evening’s details from dinner forward. Fortunately their depositions are neither the first nor the only words they have spoken on this subject. Since it is 1:00 a.m. here, how about you Google this one for yourself, sweetpea?
Goodnight and have a wonderful week.
September 2nd, 2008 at 6:56 am
Pam Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 6:48 am
People who witnessed Madeleine’s presence on the 3rd: , D & F Paine?????????
I suppose they just plain forgot to mention that in the statements.
September 2nd, 2008 at 6:48 am
People who witnessed Madeleine’s presence on the 3rd: her two parents, D & F Paine, another unidentified Kidz Club parent, a MW reception desk employee, the Tapas employees who served tea to the Kidz Club guests that day, and three nannies–C. Baker, C. Pennington, and an unidentified third who accompanied Baker and the children to the beach.
This list, of course, does not include the five people who believe they saw/may have seen Madeleine in the course of her abduction.
Please also note that the Mark Warner Kidz Club programs are open a maximum of six and a half hours each day–from 9-12:30 and from 2:30-5:30.
September 2nd, 2008 at 6:46 am
***********************
Clouseau Check this Charlotte out must be a twin …………….MW Greece 2006
NOT 2007 as in my previous post.
http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=8425009
………………
I’m not sure of any significance but in the ladies profile the second photo in her album is taken in New Zealand. Where Kate and Gerry met up to continue their courting. I wonder if they met the girl then? No date on photo.
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:21 am
chenier Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:49 am
Garth said
‘How about a closet?
——
Haven’t I suffered enough?
If you are coming out of the closet then I’m out of here.
I shall return to Tom Petty singing ‘I need to Know’
A perfectly acceptable goal for we inquiring minds.
But I really don’t need to know that you are coming out of the closet….
Too much information…
…………………………………………………..
Chenier! LOL! He’s that full of sh*te - I can imagine the stench!
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:20 am
Saint Marie Nicholas! Just read your earlier translation. Bravo! As usual! Don’t let your Hubby starve on our account though! X
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:49 am
Garth said
‘How about a closet?
——
Haven’t I suffered enough?
If you are coming out of the closet then I’m out of here.
I shall return to Tom Petty singing ‘I need to Know’
A perfectly acceptable goal for we inquiring minds.
But I really don’t need to know that you are coming out of the closet….
Too much information…
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:46 am
Hello Coco!
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:44 am
Ola
I agree that if we don’t react to injustice, it is dangerous for democracy.
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:43 am
CHATELAINE says ……. Another BTW:
“Garth is it true you are infact Oakley International…the one man band ”
“Clueless, I’m not, but it may actually shock you just who i know.”
Am I starting to understand who you might be …?
Don’t bother to reply, I’m off as I have a 7:30 am appointment, which is 6:30 your time.
……………………………………………………………………………
Garsehole is somebody who is not just watching the debate - he is watching the posters.
He has file upon file of everything that we have posted. Times we are here and away. What post propvoked which argument and why.
He even knows who was in Court and why we were there.
Great pity that he is such a Fuck-Wit. He has done the Clan about as much as good as JT in my judgement.
How many of us haven’t noted how quickly he can pull up the information he needs the instant we go off course?
He is a nobody. A porn that has become so pumped up with his own importance that he has forgotten who he is.
I see the same thing happen to prison-wardens and mental health nurses and shrinks.
Watch him look for the Achilles heel - as with Lone Pigeon etc.
If he wasn’t so fucking thick and extra-stupid with his personality changes, I would suggest that he had been in the Armed Forces.
Sad little git.
Watch the eventual response to this post! lol
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:35 am
Garth Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:32 am
Jeez, this is getting too heavy………….. im orf.
——-
:-*
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:35 am
translation on line from spanish language
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:32 am
Jeez, this is getting too heavy………….. im orf.
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:31 am
No way, I go to bed
Try and get a coherent schedule/plan together and I’ll read it tomorrow morning AFTER my 7:30 am appointment
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:30 am
“In a democracy, one fights for and there is claimed the participation of the citizens, the equity and the justice. We know, nevertheless, that not in the purest ingenuousness the perfection of the diet is reached, it is true. And nevertheless, when it is even appealed to the vocable « injustice « or « incomplete justice » or « discontinuation (or interruption) of the search of the truth », we are before a democratic sleepy State. If of game, the imperfection in the democracy is assumed as the best of the worst systems, we must not be surprised. But, if as you will help of the shape of the justice we remain silent before the latent injustice we will be, this way, resigning from our role, or, although any more it is not, from our citizenship.”
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:30 am
Châtelaine Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:29 am
Bye
———
Didnt think you’d be able to answer that one.
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:30 am
Do you think Gerry should have checked the wardrobe just incase someone nasty wasnt hiding in there?
Me get real? Chatelaine, i know its late but wake up.
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:29 am
Bye
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:28 am
Châtelaine Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:27 am
Hiding under a box-spring? Get real!
————–
How about a closet?
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:27 am
Hiding under a box-spring? Get real!
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:25 am
Sledgehammer, the forensics were a dog’s dinner I grant you, no pun intended.
September 2nd, 2008 at 12:24 am
The GENERAL assumption? You’re losing it, Garth
BTW try and explain:
Gerry enters with a key by the front door [statement], checks the children’s room and sees all 3, spends some time looking down at his daughter, goes to the bathroom to have a pee and leaves again, so crossed practically all of the apartment … and he didn’t see a “person” ?
—————–
What like you think he should maybe have looked under the bed for a possible abductor?
Me loosing it? You jeste shirely?