Comments on: Bristol Palin Is With Child

By: frank burns

frank burns — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 15:04:35 +0000

OK, so it’s Christmas and we are waiting.

By: frank burns

frank burns — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:16:18 +0000

Yeah, we see where those nads are busy in Republican families.

By: hockey mom

hockey mom — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:10:01 +0000

WOW could you dumbass libs care about anything less important? Thank God, yes i said God so don’t freak out you Godless libs, that this country is run by a group of people with a set of nads (Republicans) and will continue to be regardless of who wins this election.

By: Dick Messineo

Dick Messineo — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:09:34 +0000

I`m thinking now that it might be interesting if the Old man and his Babe win the election. It will be a non stop soap opera for a year or two, until they both get impeached, and Nancy Pelosi is appointed an interim president.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:28:01 +0000

Here’s my bet: 75% chance that she will have that Liberal Media induced miscarriage caused by stress. 25% chance that this is baby number 2, and she is only 3 1/2 months pregnant–they are obviously a fertile family.

Read this Fairytale to your children!

http://www.moms-views.blogspot.com/

By: chenier

chenier — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:23:38 +0000

Ah yes; that well known genetic condition known as being an Inuit….

By: frank burns

frank burns — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:16:25 +0000

The whole scenario fits together logically like this:

Bristol originally got pregnant last fall not by the boy they are now claiming to be the current father, but by a full-blooded Inuit or Eskimo. Bristol insisted on having an abortion, but her mother forbade her. Bristol ended up agreeing to have the baby under two conditions: 1. She would stay home from school until the baby was born, and 2. Her mother would claim that the child was actually hers. This second condition actually was a stone that killed two birds, since it would explain the baby’s squinty-eyed appearance, since they could say that because Sarah is an older mother, the baby has Down’s syndrome. Some years later, of course, it will turn out that the baby doesn’t have Down’s syndrome — but that could just be chalked up as another “miracle.”

So far, so good. We all know that Bristol stayed home those five months, and Sarah claimed to have miraculously given birth to a baby, even though she hasn’t looked pregnant beforehand.

Then, last Sunday morning, because of Sarah’s nomination has McCain’s VP, the bloggers started surmising most of the truth. Sarah, Bristol and their family and cohorts looked like they were going to be caught in their lie, so as a last-ditch effort they claimed that Bristol was five months pregnant. This apparently solves the problem, since if this were true Bristol could never have given birth to Trig (so-named because of the one son and two-mother triangle).

Just one more lie, to cover up the whole preceding string. This one seems to be working. Even the bloggers seem to have mostly fallen off from the track. Later, it will turn out that Bristol will have “unfortunately” miscarried the baby. But that won’t be until after the election in November.

By: Wesley Moore

Wesley Moore — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:54:29 +0000

Bristol is not pregnant, she was pregnant. This is the McCain camp trying to debunk the real story. Trig is Bristol’s child. Governer Palin is the grandmother of the down syndrome child. They created this story because it’s less damaging than the fact that Gov. Palin is lying about the birth of Trig. Bristol was hidden away at home, supposedly of mononucleosis, during her last 4 months of pregnancy. People who worked with the Governor didn’t believe she was pregnant, she wasn’t showing during the whole period.

——–
M&A
Artemis
Do you actually have any evidence at all to support your claim?