Seems the PJ and the AG must have been blind to miss all these startling revelations of no evidence, silly me ! they didn’t miss anything, because there is nothing to miss in the statements, NO EVIDENCE how wise and thorough are the PJ and the AG, not forgetting the Prosecutors, who signed the order.

More squirming for the lynch mob/barmy brigade today.

Sarah’is what a politician of today dresses like!

Failing that - ring the fabulous Ann widdecombe and ask her for some tips! At least she’s got her own style!

Oh! And let us have the right to bear arms - even if some of us aren’t very well and don’t know what we are doing! Do it now -rather than later! You know it makes sense.

Just give us the choice to be able to shoot the fucking horrible things that are roaming the streets these days - and hiding under kiddies beds whilst their parents pop into the back garden for a glass of wine.

Thanks Jacqui!

She should come to the UK and talk to the Government about how to stand up to the Traditionalistical Establishmentarianisms about how to get Free Speech back on the agenda - Like right now!

Might help us find out what happened to a little girl that we are unable to locate.

But boy did I cry every time she time she opened her mouth. I loved the humour, the tone, the delivery - ooooh! Wet tissues everywhere - the dog thinks I’m bonkers!

God Bless that fabulous creature! I was expecting somebody with a bit of spunk - but Wow!

I second the above comment. I too support those that the Press try to diss and put down.

they tried to rubbish her before she even had a chance to open her mouth.

our breakfast news people are choking on their cornflakes. LOL

BEST SPEECH OF THE YEAR SO FAR! Take a leaf out of her book Pammy!

GO SARAH! GO! WHAT AN ABSOLUTELY CHARMiNG IMPECCABLE WOMAN! LOVE HER TO BITS! X

Quiet? But active and energetic. Right. Quiet - but active and energetic. How often did she see her?

Thanks for the above translation - again!

Decent Posters” - I do wish that Professor Pam Pending would eventually make a comment worth reading!

She is terribly facetious for one who spouts such great literary skills.

Professor Pam Pending Says:

September 4th, 2008 at 12:40 am
Okay, someone’s going to have to choose–the statements can’t be both suspiciously similar AND inconsistent. Pick one please.

Just out of curiosity, no one thinks the photos of the French couple arrested for murdering a child have several similarities with the photofits released in support of the most recent Amsterdam sighting?
………………………………………………………………………

Coco begs ……. Will this woman ever read around the subject in its entirety? I hate the idea that some people will not grow up and expect us to spoon-feed them.

The Statements are bollocks regarding the time-lines, the checks and who was where at what particular time and for what reason.

The only consistencies appear to be that Madeleine would not go willingly with a stranger and would not fuck off out on her own - oh! - and that she was bright, intelligent and chatty etc.- like they had all been briefed on this!

How the fuck these Tapastwats knew about M’s personality and behaviour is beyond me - as she was shut away in a creche for most of the time, fed at the flat and seldom in their sight.

So they could only have learned these details from the Parents - and what they saw the other Clannies say - like Frilly Philly - on the telly.

She gave us a great account of M’s personality in a measured but highly believable way - inbetween telling us about K-woman going berserk and screaming at the PJ etc etc etc.

So it would be great if Professor Pam Pending would stop sniping at the posts of other people who are trying to make sense of this chaotic load of crap - and actually brought something of her own thoughts to the thread - or alternatively gave us some constructively critical posts.

Fucking hell! - Is it any fucking wonder that it’s so easy to get a degree in English these days - compared to twenty years ago?

PPP proves my point - Just ignore other authors and spout your mouth off without even reading about your chosen subjects and other people’s comments?

The facts are quite simple - we are being consistently misguided by the Tapastwats purely by their attempts at showing us ’similarities’ - which do not stand up to scrutiny.

Rather like PPP herself! lol

Thanks marei nicholls

My wonderings just thought

There are so many missing people
I just stayed at a farm
no one checks the land
no one questions the guns
his comings and goings
his digging
blood
changes of clothes
their means of bonemeal making
the quicksand
the pitch dark
and more

I just think if you wanted to be a successful serial killer become a farmer!

( grow a beard, get tinted specs and camoflagey kakhi jungle greens too)

a bit squiffy now…will read and add later

makes alot of sense though honestly lool

The statement starts on May the 4rth 2007 at 8.50 PM. Given that the witness doesn’t speak or write Portuguese, an interpreter, Natalia. C is required.

Dianne Webster is heard as a witness. She belongs to the group who traveled to Portugal with Madeleine’s parents. She is Fiona’s mother. She came with Fiona, her husband and her two grand-children. She has known the parents of the missing girl for about 4 years, she met them through her daughter. Since then, they have become friends.

She declares that the McCann couple has three children, a couple of twins aged 2, and Madeleine, almost 4. She thinks that it was her daughter who gave them the idea of coming to Portugal. She believes her daughter knew Portugal.

She arrived in Portugal on the 28 th of April of this year, around 12.20/ 12.30, coming from Leicestsh. to Faro, and finally to Praia Da Luz. From Faro to the OCEAN CLUB, they travelled in a shuttle from the airport. After having checked in, she was placed in apartment G5H with her family (her daughter, her son-in-law, her two grand-children).

About their habits, the witness gives the information that she only spent part of the afternoons with her family, and not even every day. Sometimes she read, she went shopping, or did other activities. During mornings she only had one lunch with her family, on the wednesday, because it was raining. The other days, she spent her morning at the tennis.

Yesterday, she went to the beach with her grand-children, her son-in-law, and her daughter. They arrived there around 3.45 PM and left at 6.15 PM, to go to the tennis where she stayed until 7 PM.Then, the witness went to her apartment with her grand-children, and, 10 minutes later, her son-in-law joined them there. She gave a bath to the children with the help of her son-in-law.

They left the appartement around 8.45 PM, and, in the company of her son-in-law, and her daughter, she went to the “TAPAS” restaurant, where they joined the rest of the group. At dinner, the couple McCann was among the friends. Following a question by us, the witness says that since her daughter had an interphone which allowed her to hear if the children screamed or cried, nobody ever went to check on them where they were. Still she says that either Kate or Gerald went several times, and regularly, as well as other couples, to check if the children were OK. During one of those checkings, Kate came back to the restaurant scared and anxious, even in a state of panic, saying that Madeleine had disappeared.

Straight away, they organised groups to search her, either in the appartment, as they thought she might have hidden herself there, or outside. Yet, despite the staff from the OCEAN CLUB helping them, the search was to no avail.

The witness doesn’t know Madeleine well, since she lives very far from the McCanns, and she can’t give an accurate description of Madeleine’s personality. Nevertheless, she reports that Madeleine was quiet, but active and energetic, and well behaved. She is a beautiful, attractive child.

During the holidays, she didn’t notice anything out of the ordinary that could be connected to the investigation.

She has no more information to provide. After reading the report with the interpreter who explains it to her, she persists, and signs.

From “Enfants Kidnappés”, translated by Marie Nicholas.

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=yHfjcq3BJno

Sorry can’t find a “Sean” thingy tonight.
But I didn’t know this one. And quite liked it.

http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/189175.html?wpc=all#comments

Nite nite all.
Welterusten
Bye all

Just out of curiosity, no one thinks the photos of the French couple arrested for murdering a child have several similarities with the photofits released in support of the most recent Amsterdam sighting?

Coz I haven’t - not even on the ones where they were allowed to do a revision exercise first! lol

THATPOORPRIEST! You are not the only one that misses things. I do it all the time! But let’s face it - there’s that much of it to follow - and get misguided by that it’s no bloody wonder LOL.

I have personally discounted JT’s accounts completely - given the amount of vague detail and contradictions.

The Panorama interview was as much as use as a fish-net condom to the Tapastwats - I fear that instea of putting us straight - she confused the issues even more. lol

And hasn’t been prosecuted for not keeping quiet either! Curious!