
Madeleine McCann: When The Sniffer Dogs Barked And Casey Anthony
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
THE SUN (front page): “BARKING – The moment Maddie cops say dog made McCanns ‘suspects’
No, not the tabloid dog pack. There’s a picture of a spaniel crawling on a sofa. To its rear is a man. There is a pair of blue drapes, open.
And another picture of a dog, which may be same dog. The caption:
Howl … pooch alerts handler to ‘evidence’ found in the parents’ rented motor
Pages 4 and 5: “HOUNDING OF THE McCANNS”
THESE were the scenes as two police sniffer dogs investigated the disappearance of little Madeleine McCann — and left her shell-shocked parents wrongly in the frame.
You can never trust a dog, much less a Portuguese dog…
The 2½-hour film, shot on a police camcorder, chronicles the work of two specially-trained British sniffer dogs.
It was the British all along, friendly fire, blue on blue disaster…
It details the moments when the springer spaniels apparently detected:
Barking … the moment Maddie cops say dog made McCanns ’suspects’
The scent of a dead body in the McCanns’ rented Renault Scenic, hired 25 days after Maddie vanished shortly before her fourth birthday in May 2007
An aroma of blood in a bedroom cupboard in the family’s Praia da Luz holiday apartment, and
A smell of death on Kate’s clothes.
Good of the Sun to repeat all the apparent speculation again. And tell us that – hold that apology to the Portuguese, the dog handler was one of them, a Portuguese…
Eddie is first to be taken into the two-bed apartment and spends nearly 30 minutes sniffing around. He barks twice — once in a bedroom and once at a spot behind a sofa underneath a living room window.
Woof! Woof!
Martin says: “As soon as I came in the dog is very excited. From his body language it would appear he has picked up a scent that he recognises. There is enough scent there for him to give me a bark indication.”
Woof!
After Eddie leaves the apartment, Martin takes in Keela. She can be seen freezing — a sign she has found something — underneath the window where Eddie had earlier barked.
And..?
Martin says on camera: “The crime scene dog has given me a positive indication. That indicates to me there is some human blood there. She will detect blood that is very old and find anybody’s blood.”
Not a blood hound – a spaniel…
While Portuguese cops carried out DNA tests on “fluids” found in the flat, it has never been revealed if any blood was found.
And the British at the forensic lab in Birmingham, don’t forget them…
Detectives also asked Martin to use his dogs on the McCanns’ hire car.
Oh, yes, the Renault Scenic…
Eddie is seen barking at the driver’s door before standing still in the boot, then scrabbling in one corner. Martin says: “We had a reaction from the dog. The scent is coming out of the sealed door.”
RINGSIDE REPORT (US): “More Charges For Caylee’s mom”
An online boxing magazine delivers the news with punch. Ding! Ding!
Every time a child disappears, it must be taken seriously. For months, we have been awaiting for good news of British girl Madeleine McCann, the four year old princess who disappeared in Portugal. Now, it turns out, the United States has an even worse case at hand, that of Caylee Anthony, a 3 year old angel who mysteriously disappeared from Florida and whom police investigations point out to be a likely murder victim.
Seconds out!
Number one, if Casey Anthony is involved in her daughter’s disappearance, all she deserves is 12 rounds with Lennox Lewis, after having people completely tie her up to a corner. Number two, we are all praying at RSR so that the first thing the grandmother said becomes a reality, and Caylee is found alive, as well as Madeleine McCann.
Lennox beats up women, Lennox beats up women, la-la-la-la…
Posted: 5th, September 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (691) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 5th, 2008 at 9:49 am
Raspy
read the article…ffs its simple really
September 5th, 2008 at 9:48 am
Arseputin Sreaming Queen Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 9:23 am
Another very very very bad day for the barmy brigade/antis/lynch mob/posse, squirm all day every day, how bereft of any conscience these people are.
……………………………………………………………….
Posters - This is what we call errrrrr ….. projection ……. transference ……… fuk-wittish! lol
September 5th, 2008 at 9:46 am
liza Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 9:41 am
Another point I would like to underscore is that I do not feel that investigating the McC’s (which in Italy we would say was ‘un atto dovuto’ something that would normally have to be done) did in any way jeopardize the search for Madeleine, don’t the files show that all traces were checked/sightings checked, interviews held, resources used, etc?
—————-
I totally agree.
But surely the initial leaks under Amaral must tell you something?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:44 am
Of course clueless you will provide the unabridged link to the six bodies, with the direct quote, shall I hold my breath, thought not, another fantasy clueless. You are rattling like the Shanghai express.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:42 am
coco Says
ELVERA! Kitten! Elvera Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Stop sounding so bloody attractive! The Weirdy Ones will be all over you like a rash LOL!
———————————————————————–
I’ve no worries over the likes of Garsehole and Ratspewtin………me and my hounds could eat them for breakfast!
September 5th, 2008 at 9:41 am
garth - which one, you mean abt the blood belonging to anybody?
Yes, but the biological samples in the car boot were consistent with M’s - in any case Garth, the bottom line is that they were not charged, just investigated.
Another point I would like to underscore is that I do not feel that investigating the McC’s (which in Italy we would say was ‘un atto dovuto’ something that would normally have to be done) did in any way jeopardize the search for Madeleine, don’t the files show that all traces were checked/sightings checked, interviews held, resources used, etc?
I don’t suppose the same police officers investigating the McC’s (and let’s remember that everything the McC’s did during the week was 100% relevant to what happened to their daughter, especially in case an abduction occurred, which is why Garth I for one am moved to condemn K for not replying to all questions)
September 5th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Bonjour Clouseau! Lovely day - even though it’s raining in the UK!
A lovely enlightening day! A day to remember!
Beware the Weird!
BRANDONFLOURS! What an utterly fab site you directed us to!
Have just ordered the pet pouches - I have nine cats who are only allowed to live in the house and a use cat-run/pen accessed through the garden-room - which is my rear visitor’s entrance - so to speak! lol
So have bought a couple to spare myself the embarrassment of ammonia occasionally stinging my eyes when I’ve been away all day.
Thanks ever so much! X
September 5th, 2008 at 9:38 am
would love to claim credit for the Anorak dog however I cant but a big thankyou to whoever it was its a classic http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4cu8Yq-gWc&feature=related
Raspy yes the sarcasm I saw it SIX DEAD BODIES
another classic
September 5th, 2008 at 9:36 am
I shall donate some sanity to the homeless clowns unit, when any one can give a direct link to KM claiming the cadaver myth.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Read my last post liza
September 5th, 2008 at 9:35 am
Merci Garth!!
A big kiss, now I gotta go back to work!
baci
liza
September 5th, 2008 at 9:34 am
Elvera - in any case the dogs just show where to look, and it appears that the places they indicated actually did have blood/biological material. So the dogs were actually 100% correct.
The DNA assays were just not conclusive as per Portuguese laws.
Anyway, I’m impressed (Garth, you can’t deny that the dogs did find the traces…)
September 5th, 2008 at 9:33 am
liza
42
Elevera
What did the dog handler say to the Portuguese regarding the cadaver? Do you know?
And why did he say this do you think?
The blood had been proven to be exactly that. But it does not prove who it belonged to as you well know.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:33 am
Yes clueless, not as you expected you obviously missed the sarcasm in the BARKING headline.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:33 am
ELVERA! Kitten! Elvera Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Stop sounding so bloody attractive! The Weirdy Ones will be all over you like a rash LOL!
September 5th, 2008 at 9:31 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4cu8Yq-gWc&feature=related
woof
September 5th, 2008 at 9:31 am
Who let the clown out ?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:29 am
Hi Kittens!
Real-life day today - so can’t hang around.
I note that the Arse-Weedo Weirdy-Men are up and about jolly early these days - and up until all hours.
I hope you don’t give them too many chances to distract you all from your pertinent observations!
Watch the rapidity with which all the Arse-Weedo Weirdy-Men bring up all their cut and pastes! Barmy!
………… And when they can’t find them - we get those vulgar references to bums and forced sex (rape) - Mmmmmmmmm!
Reminder to the Weirdy-Men —- THERE ARE THIRTEEN VOLUMES OF THIS!
THIRTEEN!
Just to provide much amusement for gigglers like me - Try coming up with different responses - instead of your usual tripe - you boring set of Fuck-wits!
September 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
http://www.mccannfiles.com/id155.html
Good timeline checks
September 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Garth - I haven’t got a clue, that’s why I’m asking. I have to check my passport to remember how ancient I am, since I always think I’m since 22
September 5th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Yes but Garth, these are not just any old sniffer dogs, they are the TOP dogs in their field. They BOTH indicated the same ’suspicious’ area, behind the moved settee and subsequent investigations ‘picked up’ the unusual spatterings on the wall and under the tile. No, I don’t for one moment believe the dogs were mistaken, they did their job good and proper…it is the skewed, illogical response of some stupid humans who wish to discredit them, goodness knows why!
Let’s hear it for the dogs………..
September 5th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Garth - honestly? I mean, do you honestly feel they aren’t hiding anything?
Then don’t you feel they must be really incredibly bad physicians?
Anyway, thanks for replying
September 5th, 2008 at 9:26 am
How old do you think I am?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:25 am
iza Says:
September 5th, 2008 at 9:10 am
And it doesn’t answer my last question, but I actually didn’t expect you to answer, at least not truthfully, or at least not here!
Which was…..
“Garth I would love to ask you whether you are quite confident the McC’s are not hiding anything (checking timelines, or sedation etc)….”
liza
No problem.
I am confident they were hiding absolutely nothing.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:23 am
Another very very very bad day for the barmy brigade/antis/lynch mob/posse, squirm all day every day, how bereft of any conscience these people are.
September 5th, 2008 at 9:23 am
Garth Garth may I please ask you a personal question? I’m soooo curious… how old are you?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:22 am
liza
I was talking about the cadaver. Remember?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:21 am
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/article1651802.ece?slideshowPopup=true&articleId=1651802
September 5th, 2008 at 9:21 am
I can see we’ve gone into ’silly’ mode now. Excellent!
Proves something doesn’t it?
September 5th, 2008 at 9:21 am
Garth, sorry, but didn’t they carry out DNA assays on biological samples harvested from the sites pointed out by the dogs? Plus, arguidoship is not equal to being charged, don’t you think?
And from what I understand, this is one element which lead to the arguidoship status for the McC’s (not for Murat, obviously)
And it doesn’t answer my last question, but I actually didn’t expect you to answer, at least not truthfully, or at least not here!