<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin: Let&#8217;s Talk Hair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-380851</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-380851</guid>
		<description>I am a registered Republican, at first I had decided to vote for John McCain, but later changed my mind. When it came to my knowledge that he abandoned what he originally stood for and over the years adopted the Bush hard line.  It's understood that he wanted to prove to the Republican base he was one of them and not the maverick they disliked, which proves his inefficiency to stand up to the Republican Party.

On separate occasions the McCain's stated that they were not going to run a nasty campaign, which they contradicted by providing us with dishonest commercials, campaign speeches, and interviews.  They denied to the press of having carried out such campaign. They said whatever they stated regarding themselves and Barack Obama is a fact.  Several times John McCain stated that if Barack Obama had done what he had suggested then he could have run a more civil campaign.  This sounds like imposition to me.  Doesn't he realize that we can see through this excuse?

When people in general raised questions regarding John McCain’s age he assures them of having an experienced Vice Presidential candidate, in case something happens to him.  Hence he decided the best person for this position would be Sarah Palin.  This leaves the country in dismay as she has limited political experience. 


However, she was introduced at the Republican convention as a maverick, a reformer, who did not take earmarks, nor support the bridge to nowhere, and who never indulges in wasteful spending. Besides she was declared as an expert on the economy, well versed in foreign affairs, and having more experience than Joe Biden and Barack Obama put together.


Recently in an interview on Sarah Palin, Charles Gibson (reporter for CBS) proved the claims about her to be false.  She is a devout Christian, but she refuses to tell the truth, and when Charles Gibson asked her to revise her blatant lies she refused too.  Isn't this violating the laws of Christianity?  Thus it seems she is willing to compromise her religious faith to be the next VP of the United States of America.


She has extreme beliefs and views on many subjects like the Iraq war (she thinks this war is God's will), abortion (she does not believe in it even in circumstances of incest and rape and if she gets a chance she will overturn Roe V. Wade), views on hunting (she allows people to shoot animals from planes), taking protection way (wants to take polar bears off the endangered species list).  Besides she attends a church that believes in getting rid of homosexuality through prayer and that Jews have been persecuted for their refusal to believe in Jesus. She is currently under investigation for a possible abuse of her power as Governor of Alaska. Lastly, she feels global warming is a natural phenomenon and there is no evidence that it is man-made.

As for my belief on the abortion issue I do not believe in abortion for myself as a choice, however, I do believe it should be a woman's choice and not the federal or state government's.  God did give humans free will to make their own decisions and as a result we are responsible for all of them.  God will be the final judge of all our sins and all sins are created equal in God's eyes. So, does anybody feel Sarah Palin somehow forgot this?

After being disappointed in John McCain and how he has chosen to run his campaign; I decided to start watching the Democratic campaign speeches and realized Obama is at least talking about the issues like the economy, job loss, health care and education. McCain spends the majority of his time distorting Obama's record and lying about his proposed ideas for this country. You would think McCain would spend his time talking about what he is going to do for this country.  Well the most ironic thing McCain has done is now he is talking about being the change candidate.   Does anybody think it's strange that for the last 18 months or so McCain never mentioned being the change candidate?  As I remembered, McCain was running a campaign for the last 18 months or so on experience.

On September the 15th the stock market fell more than 500 points, then Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy; job losses is still at a record high and gasoline prices are on a rise again.  On this same day, McCain at a campaign rally made the following statement “he thinks the economy is fundamentally strong”.   Does anybody really think John McCain is in touch with what's going on in this economy?   Well, McCain shame on you.

Melissa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a registered Republican, at first I had decided to vote for John McCain, but later changed my mind. When it came to my knowledge that he abandoned what he originally stood for and over the years adopted the Bush hard line.  It&#8217;s understood that he wanted to prove to the Republican base he was one of them and not the maverick they disliked, which proves his inefficiency to stand up to the Republican Party.</p>
<p>On separate occasions the McCain&#8217;s stated that they were not going to run a nasty campaign, which they contradicted by providing us with dishonest commercials, campaign speeches, and interviews.  They denied to the press of having carried out such campaign. They said whatever they stated regarding themselves and Barack Obama is a fact.  Several times John McCain stated that if Barack Obama had done what he had suggested then he could have run a more civil campaign.  This sounds like imposition to me.  Doesn&#8217;t he realize that we can see through this excuse?</p>
<p>When people in general raised questions regarding John McCain’s age he assures them of having an experienced Vice Presidential candidate, in case something happens to him.  Hence he decided the best person for this position would be Sarah Palin.  This leaves the country in dismay as she has limited political experience. </p>
<p>However, she was introduced at the Republican convention as a maverick, a reformer, who did not take earmarks, nor support the bridge to nowhere, and who never indulges in wasteful spending. Besides she was declared as an expert on the economy, well versed in foreign affairs, and having more experience than Joe Biden and Barack Obama put together.</p>
<p>Recently in an interview on Sarah Palin, Charles Gibson (reporter for CBS) proved the claims about her to be false.  She is a devout Christian, but she refuses to tell the truth, and when Charles Gibson asked her to revise her blatant lies she refused too.  Isn&#8217;t this violating the laws of Christianity?  Thus it seems she is willing to compromise her religious faith to be the next VP of the United States of America.</p>
<p>She has extreme beliefs and views on many subjects like the Iraq war (she thinks this war is God&#8217;s will), abortion (she does not believe in it even in circumstances of incest and rape and if she gets a chance she will overturn Roe V. Wade), views on hunting (she allows people to shoot animals from planes), taking protection way (wants to take polar bears off the endangered species list).  Besides she attends a church that believes in getting rid of homosexuality through prayer and that Jews have been persecuted for their refusal to believe in Jesus. She is currently under investigation for a possible abuse of her power as Governor of Alaska. Lastly, she feels global warming is a natural phenomenon and there is no evidence that it is man-made.</p>
<p>As for my belief on the abortion issue I do not believe in abortion for myself as a choice, however, I do believe it should be a woman&#8217;s choice and not the federal or state government&#8217;s.  God did give humans free will to make their own decisions and as a result we are responsible for all of them.  God will be the final judge of all our sins and all sins are created equal in God&#8217;s eyes. So, does anybody feel Sarah Palin somehow forgot this?</p>
<p>After being disappointed in John McCain and how he has chosen to run his campaign; I decided to start watching the Democratic campaign speeches and realized Obama is at least talking about the issues like the economy, job loss, health care and education. McCain spends the majority of his time distorting Obama&#8217;s record and lying about his proposed ideas for this country. You would think McCain would spend his time talking about what he is going to do for this country.  Well the most ironic thing McCain has done is now he is talking about being the change candidate.   Does anybody think it&#8217;s strange that for the last 18 months or so McCain never mentioned being the change candidate?  As I remembered, McCain was running a campaign for the last 18 months or so on experience.</p>
<p>On September the 15th the stock market fell more than 500 points, then Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy; job losses is still at a record high and gasoline prices are on a rise again.  On this same day, McCain at a campaign rally made the following statement “he thinks the economy is fundamentally strong”.   Does anybody really think John McCain is in touch with what&#8217;s going on in this economy?   Well, McCain shame on you.</p>
<p>Melissa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dairy</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-376502</link>
		<dc:creator>dairy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-376502</guid>
		<description>..I can't believe they are analysing her hair now....?   what next???   better not go there perhaps....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..I can&#8217;t believe they are analysing her hair now&#8230;.?   what next???   better not go there perhaps&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-375775</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-375775</guid>
		<description>If we are honest - Palin is an astoundingly good speaker with lovely hair. 

I reckon that even if she wasn't - Women want to be her - and men want her to get her tits out!

That's why McCain chose her! She looks great and sounds great - and she has lovely hair-styles.

Let's hope she mutes herself on the anti-gay and anti-abortion stuff - we don't want her sounding too Evangelist at the moment - there are other religions, gay men and women, vegetarians, anti-hunt and pro-abortion votes to get a hold on!

Toe the party-line first Palin - It's not the Palin Party   -   It's the Republican Party! 

Many Thanks to Palin from    .............  

Coco of the Commentariat Party    -   At your service if you want to nuke all the hot sandy bits that are becoming a drain on our armies and fuel tanks. 

I also do a cheap line in biological weapons if you wish to receive my new catalogue. Doesn't affect animals, birds, trees, plants or people willing to switch allegiance! XXXX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are honest - Palin is an astoundingly good speaker with lovely hair. </p>
<p>I reckon that even if she wasn&#8217;t - Women want to be her - and men want her to get her tits out!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why McCain chose her! She looks great and sounds great - and she has lovely hair-styles.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope she mutes herself on the anti-gay and anti-abortion stuff - we don&#8217;t want her sounding too Evangelist at the moment - there are other religions, gay men and women, vegetarians, anti-hunt and pro-abortion votes to get a hold on!</p>
<p>Toe the party-line first Palin - It&#8217;s not the Palin Party   -   It&#8217;s the Republican Party! </p>
<p>Many Thanks to Palin from    &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.  </p>
<p>Coco of the Commentariat Party    -   At your service if you want to nuke all the hot sandy bits that are becoming a drain on our armies and fuel tanks. </p>
<p>I also do a cheap line in biological weapons if you wish to receive my new catalogue. Doesn&#8217;t affect animals, birds, trees, plants or people willing to switch allegiance! XXXX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnetite</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-375385</link>
		<dc:creator>magnetite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-375385</guid>
		<description>The 'inner fox' is actually a unique method of gutting and cleaning the real animal. The trapped fox is slit along the stomach and placed atop the hunter's head. Pulling down as one would don a ski mask, the idea is to eat the animal from the inside while wearing it. This beautiful and strangely mesmerising display of murderous millinery culminates in the hunter sucking the foxes eyes out backward from the sockets. Then it is sold to supermodels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;inner fox&#8217; is actually a unique method of gutting and cleaning the real animal. The trapped fox is slit along the stomach and placed atop the hunter&#8217;s head. Pulling down as one would don a ski mask, the idea is to eat the animal from the inside while wearing it. This beautiful and strangely mesmerising display of murderous millinery culminates in the hunter sucking the foxes eyes out backward from the sockets. Then it is sold to supermodels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-375369</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-375369</guid>
		<description>Style interests men more than substance - fact
Because they think it is either one or the other, or one before the other- fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Style interests men more than substance - fact<br />
Because they think it is either one or the other, or one before the other- fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-375365</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-375365</guid>
		<description>Women always do style before substance - fact.

M and A

Now isn't that a male prerogative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women always do style before substance - fact.</p>
<p>M and A</p>
<p>Now isn&#8217;t that a male prerogative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magnetite</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/189411/broadsheets/sarah-palin-lets-talk-hair.html/comment-page-1#comment-375357</link>
		<dc:creator>magnetite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 10:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=189411#comment-375357</guid>
		<description>"...feminine without being feminine, but quite repressed, and because of that oddly sexy."

No, Celia. That's Shirley MacLaine in Two Mules for Sister Sara.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;feminine without being feminine, but quite repressed, and because of that oddly sexy.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, Celia. That&#8217;s Shirley MacLaine in Two Mules for Sister Sara.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
