
Madeleine McCann: Looking For 1 Million, Raonaid Murray And Amaral’s Book
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
DAILY MIRROR (front page): “WE’VE SPENT £1M HUNTING FOR MADDIE.”
Kate and Gerry McCann Exclusive: We’ve spent £1m hunting Maddy - EXCLUSIVE McCanns vow to keep searching
THE SUN: “McCanns spend £1m on Maddie search” - Not exclusive.
THE MIRROR: “The couple have shielded the twins from what few facts are known about Madeleine’s disappearance in May last year.”
A few facts? There is only one fact: a child disappeared.
Gerry revealed: “They realise Madeleine is not here but they don’t know the details.”
What details?
DAILY MAIL: “Kate McCann: We’ve spent £1m trying to find Madeleine”
Speaking about their spending on the search for Madeleine, Kate said: ‘It’s a lot of money but we can’t set a limit. A child does not have a price. We will pay what we have to.”
A child might have a price. Isn’t that part of the fear?
DAILY EXPRESS: “KATE’S FURY AT DETECTIVE WHO PUBLISHED BOOK ON MADELEINE”
Fury. Always the fury.
KATE McCann has broken her dignified silence to attack the Portuguese detective who led the bungled hunt for Madeleine. She slated Goncalo Amaral for failing to find her little girl and for trying to cash in on the tragedy by writing a book
Tsk! Writing on the McCann saga for profit. The Express (10p cheaper than the Mail) is right to be outraged. What scum would do such a thing..?
As for Kate’s fury…
Says Kate McCann in Expresso, a Portuguese newspaper: “They could still have arrested us, couldn’t they? They could have stopped us from going home.”
Fury, indeed…
Says Gerry McCann: “I will be honest. We have got no idea whether Madeleine is alive or not. What we are certain of is that there is absolutely no evidence.”
Says Clarence Mitchell:
“Kate and Gerry have chosen to speak out to an element of the Portu¬guese media because they firmly believe that there may well be important information that somebody knows in Portugal. They will do everything they can to generate new leads.”
IRISH INDEPENDENT: “’I cannot bring myself to walk down the road where she died’”
Just after midnight on September 4, 1999, Raonaid Murray was murdered savagely with a knife only 500 yards from her home in the south Dublin suburb of Glenageary.
Terrible. And Madeleine..?
Sean Hammond, a lecturer in forensic psychology at University College Cork, says high-profile murders can often have a profound impact on our behaviour and our feelings of safety. “They can leave an indelible mark. Even though the risks may be very low, people may no longer feel that it is safe to walk the streets at night. If you take a case like that of Madeleine McCann, people would have adjusted their behaviour towards their children as a result of that.”
Madeleine McCann: the benchmark of pain…
Posted: 6th, September 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (253) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





September 6th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Here we go again……!
Grasputin,insulting,arrogant,derogative,intrusive….in one and singles word: disgusting
September 6th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
chenier - my kids and I did karate together - I loved it (until I tore my anterior cruciate ligament that is!) my kids less so….. I guess the discipline was too much for them….
September 6th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
What sort of a poster is it who does not know that the also ” to” should be spelt
“too” ?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Julie
POLYGAMY

I know youre not a man and you do not intend to be one either jajajajaja
XXXX
September 6th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Barack Obama arrives at the gate of Paradise, in front of Sint Peter, who asks him:
-Who are you?
_ I’m Barack Obama, the first black President of the USA.
-Black President of the US? When did this happen?
_Less than 20 minutes ago.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:55 pm
Yes clueless, your comments appear to be somewhat clueless, no evidence I believe the AG intoned.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Marie N
Yes, I watched it.
Until my eyeballs started to bleed.
Admittedly, I dispatched the Offspring to self defence classes when she was much younger than the child in the video.
The kids had a great time, learned to be cautious without being afraid, and learned how to deal with people trying to grab them.
I have yet to meet a small child who does not enjoy practising shouting their heads off…
September 6th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
What sort of poster does not know the difference between fair comment and libel, after all agw’s explaining of the difference to.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
NO Jo … I’m not a man - never was - and never intend to be
Wassa ploigamic wedding?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Raspy
looks loke more holes in the timeline…I will wait for a good translation before I comment
September 6th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Just found this new thread and regardin the DNA evidence, I”m sure it was from the
files that the FSS originally had 15-19 markers which were subsequently “lost”.
Stuart Prior was furious and suggested that amount of evidence would be enough to
charge a suspect in the U.K..
Also, I did address this to Rasputin in the other thread, in the mccannfiles.co.uk
Final Report, it states the PJ could not confirm any sighting of Madeleine after 5.30pm. on 3rd May. David Payne says, at Gerry”s request, he checked on Kate at
6.30pm and she was bathing the children. He says he was there for 30minutes, she says 30 seconds.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
I’ll translate Russell o’Brien’s statement. Be back in an hour or so.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:50 pm
JULIE

are you a man?
At long last I can ask you…I spend the whole night wondering and having nightmares about it
Wassup?when are we gretting married?
I think Im going to end up polygamic coz there have been talk that I would marry a beautiful brasilian man to help him get european residency et all etc….. is this a problem do you think?how does the SA law stand with ploigamic weddings?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
MN - the girl doesn’t seem to be wearing a seatbelt in the car!!!! or is she?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
jo Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
I would have thought that any Portuguese citizen would have informed the PJ
or the Portuguese newspapers if they had this very important information.
Plus…there’s a £1, 500, 000 reward on offer.
Am sure any sensible Portuguese citizen would who had such important
information would have already put in a claim. Long ago.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Biltong anyone?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
chenier
Did you watch the video above? What do you think of the children being warned by their mother, that it will be perhaps a man, perhaps a woman, perhaps an old man, or anold woman that will abduct them? This is absolutely crazy.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Thanks MarieN
September 6th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Matt
The mccanIVF have given this interview in portugal coz they believe ,clarrie says,that there are many important infos somebody knows in portugal

Info ….? about what?
They are fucking worried aint they
NOT worried about Madeleine but worried about their own dirty arses of course
September 6th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Marie N,
I think you have to bear in mind that rationality disappeared a long time ago in the way that people debate the disappearance of Madeleine.
The Mirror’s article about the 2,550 pages of sightings spread over 17 volumes, revealing
‘that every effort was made to interview each witness and check out every sighting.’
is simply ignored, since it doesn’t fit the profile.
Equally, the fact that had the PJ wanted to fit anyone up they would have done a much better job of it is discarded since that, too, doesn’t fit the profile.
The fact that they were British dogs, with a British handler, who checked a lot of different places, is slid over, since that doesn’t fit the profile.
In fact, anything which doesn’t fit the profile is ignored, since the old standby of libeling Murat et al is no longer available to anyone with any sense.
The alternative is to libel the British dog handler, which is equally unwise since he would most certainly be able to seek and win libel damages in our jurisdiction….
September 6th, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Dee, I tried to put the link for you, but it porbably got caught in the spam filter. If you google frommybigdesk, I’m sure you’ll get it. It is in English.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
Dee Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Not a lot in it really.
She fibbed about the McCann’s “checks” though.
Said that Dr G P and Dr K each did several “checks” between her arrival at the
Tapas at approx 8.50pm…(or if you believe R Oldfield’s statement…9.00pm), and the “alarm”.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
Dee,
I translated it in one of the previous threads on this site. You can also find it in frommybigdesk.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Dee Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Clouseau, do you think Diane Websters statement will come out?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The AG’s statement is out, you know the one, he is the guy whose underlings read all the statements, you know the result.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Matt, do you have a link at all, i haven’t seen it yet.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:29 pm
Dee Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
The May 4th 2007 one from her has been released.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Dee Says:
September 6th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Last I heard he was supposed to attend for an Irish Radio talkshow…but
didn’t turn up.
September 6th, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Clouseau, do you think Diane Websters statement will come out?
September 6th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
obrains statement out
September 6th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Does anyone know anything more about the irish witness that [thought he] saw gerry carrying a small child towards the beach?
–
M&A
Artemis
Edited for libel.