It seems to me that it is irrelevant, at-least in her own State, whether or not Gov. Palin denies the rumour.

This is the result of an opinion sampling in Alaska
http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2008/09/18/hot-seat-the-truth-about-palin/

The TIMES, FINANCIAL TIMES, DAILY TELEGRAPH, INDEPENDENT & THE GUARDIAN.

‘We in Britain…’

As far as I am aware Adam is Adam, in the singular.

Improbable as it may seem to him, he is not speaking for Britain, nor any part of Britain.

He is speaking for himself.

Which is just as well since the rest of us may not wish to be associated with someone who is prepared to repeat any rumour he comes across as if it were engraved on tablets of stone and handed down from the mountain…

We in Britain are certain that “hidden racism” will take a turn for the worse in the up-coming elections. A McCain-Palin victory will give out a signal to the world that the USA has not really changed. Americans will have few friends - indeed, old enmities may re-surface with a heavily armed Russia and an economically resurgent China. It is unthinkable that McCain can broker any deal between Israel and the Arabs.

Most important, an increasingly sophisticated terrorist network loyal to Osama bin Laden (note that he has not been betrayed despite a huge bounty on his head) will take its time to penetrate defences and plant “dirty” bombs in the heartland.

In short, Americans will blow their last chance in a generation to restore peace at home and good-will internationally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E_23HhsKOQQ

She didn’t raise one word of opposition to it.

We know that she has very little contact with non-whites other than Alaska Natives whom she has not helped at all as governor. It is legitimate for us to ask how she will treat people of color as VP.

I don’t think this is a good sign.

He’ll be the next Hitler if elected especially with his teen special forces.

Michelle’s Boot Camps For Radicals
INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 9/4/2008

Election ‘08: Democrats’ reintroduction of militant Michelle Obama in Denver was supposed to show her softer side. But it only highlighted a radical part of her resume: Public Allies.

IBD Series: The Audacity Of Socialism

Barack Obama was a founding member of the board of Public Allies in 1992, resigning before his wife became executive director of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies in 1993. Obama plans to use the nonprofit group, which he features on his campaign Web site, as the model for a national service corps. He calls his Orwellian program, “Universal Voluntary Public Service.”

Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth into government-funded reeducation camps where they’ll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of “social change.”

The pitch Public Allies makes on its Web site doesn’t seem all that radical. It promises to place young adults (18-30) in paid one-year “community leadership” positions with nonprofit or government agencies. They’ll also be required to attend weekly training workshops and three retreats.

In exchange, they’ll get a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health and child care. They also get a post-service education award of $4,725 that can be used to pay off past student loans or fund future education.

But its real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring about “social change” through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation — the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul “The Red” Alinsky.

“Our alumni are more than twice as likely as 18-34 year olds to . . . engage in protest activities,” Public Allies boasts in a document found with its tax filings. It has already deployed an army of 2,200 community organizers like Obama to agitate for “justice” and “equality” in his hometown of Chicago and other U.S. cities, including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, New York, Phoenix, Pittsburgh and Washington. “I get to practice being an activist,” and get paid for it, gushed Cincinnati recruit Amy Vincent.

Public Allies promotes “diversity and inclusion,” a program paper says. More than 70% of its recruits are “people of color.” When they’re not protesting, they’re staffing AIDS clinics, handing out condoms, bailing criminals out of jail and helping illegal aliens and the homeless obtain food stamps and other welfare.

Public Allies brags that more than 80% of graduates have continued working in nonprofit or government jobs. It’s training the “next generation of nonprofit leaders” — future “social entrepreneurs.”

The Obamas discourage work in the private sector. “Don’t go into corporate America,” Michelle has exhorted youth. “Work for the community. Be social workers.” Shun the “money culture,” Barack added. “Individual salvation depends on collective salvation.”

“If you commit to serving your community,” he pledged in his Denver acceptance speech, “we will make sure you can afford a college education.” So, go through government to go to college, and then go back into government.

Many of today’s youth find the pitch attractive. “I may spend the rest of my life trying to create social movement,” said Brian Coovert of the Cincinnati chapter. “There is always going to be work to do. Until we have a perfect country, I’ll have a job.”

Not all the recruits appreciate the PC indoctrination. “It was too touchy-feely,” said Nelly Nieblas, 29, of the 2005 Los Angeles class. “It’s a lot of talk about race, a lot of talk about sexism, a lot of talk about homophobia, talk about -isms and phobias.”

One of those -isms is “heterosexism,” which a Public Allies training seminar in Chicago describes as a negative byproduct of “capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege.”

The government now funds about half of Public Allies’ expenses through Clinton’s AmeriCorps. Obama wants to fully fund it and expand it into a national program that some see costing $500 billion. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the military, he said.

The gall of it: The Obamas want to create a boot camp for radicals who hate the military — and stick American taxpayers with the bill.

http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=305420655186700

The unsupported claim by waitstaff - by someone who refuses to be named and refuses to identify the restaurant! - that Sarah Palin said something disgusting in public, is not exactly damning, as all the Democratic blogs I have seen discussing this agree. Possibly Ms Palin said something like this - and possibly she didn’t, and possibly she just laughed when someone else said it. We don’t know and we don’t have any reliable testimony about the incident. I accept that

Defending her saying it, however, by arguing that referring to Obama and Clinton as “Sambo and the bitch” would have been OK except it was “stripped of context”? Huh. That makes it sound like you believe she said it - and that you think it was funny.

Now you’re claiming it’s *true*, but there’s some *context* that will make it… defensible?

Please, share the context.

Mods and Admin
Grace

Your name is terribly unfortunate Mike. Perhaps you would like to think of changing it to something else whilst posting to Anorak. You don’t have to tell your parents and your secret is safe with us

BOOOK BANNING - CRY WOLF!

HEARSAY ACCUSATION OF RACISM - CRY WOLF!!!