Madeleine McCann: Let’s Investigate Kate McCann’s Pain
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
Kate McCann’s Diary extracts are published. Now read on…
DAILY EXPRESS: “HEARTBREAK DIARY REVEALS KATE’S ANGER AND DESPAIR”
In one heartbreaking entry Kate writes: “Can’t stop thinking about Madeleine, about her fear and pain. How can I go on knowing that her life could have ended like this? This week I have been quite overtaken by black thoughts. Please God, bring her back.”
Can’t stop writing about Madeleine… What says the “WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER”?
Last night experts said Kate’s emotions read like those of a bereaved mother.
Can’t pull the wool over the Express’ experts…
Chartered psychologist Dr Rick Norris said: “The diary shows she is an intelligent woman who is able to articulate her feelings on paper.”
Get a load of that spelling…
“This is a horrible situation – every parent’s worst nightmare.”
So says the expert reading from the big tabloid book of expert quotes.
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann: Kate McCann’s diary reveals anguish of losing her - The diary of Kate McCann has laid bare for the first time her inner despair at Madeleine going missing in Portugal”
Let’s take a peek at her private pain…
Or as the Tabloid Telegraph puts it:
At the height of the smear campaign against the McCanns, Portuguese investigators made extracts from the diary public, deliberately selected in a bid to portray the couple as cold and dispassionate.
You see, we’re not prying, peeping, behaving like voyeurs; we’re setting the record straight. We are investigating…
Posted: 15th, September 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (174) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- June on In Pictures: Herman Van Rompuy’s Pet Dalek Introduces President Iain Duncan Smith
- Cheryl on In Pictures: Herman Van Rompuy’s Pet Dalek Introduces President Iain Duncan Smith
- Cheryl on Sven Goran Eriksson: Then And Now
- Anorak on I’m A Celebrity: Naked Katie Price Becomes Kate And Jordan ‘Dies’
- Anorak on In Pictures: Herman Van Rompuy’s Pet Dalek Introduces President Iain Duncan Smith
September 17th, 2008 at 11:35 pm
Why did you censor my post????
Of course the post was my opinion! What a joke this site is! As long as people support the crazy Amaral, their posts get put up without being edited.
——–
M&A
Artemis
Sadly, however, you neglected to mention that the post reflected your opinion; instead you made claims of fact which you cannot support by evidence.
As for your claim about Amaral, no, they don’t, as you would realise if you bothered to read the other posts on this thread.
September 17th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Kate McCann did not release her diary. [in my opinion] The edit PJ did. They released it without her permission [edit in my opinion] and it is not only a violation of her privacy but also a copyright violation. [in my opinion] If Kate WANTED to release her diary she could have made a lot of money from it. Instead the News of the World cared more about making a quid than protecting her privacy or that of Madeleine. Those were her most intimate thoughts and shame on all of you for scrutinizing them like you had the right to read them! This is not a soap opera but real, living breathing people that have feelings. FGS, do you all have no shame? Or are you all heartless zombies without souls?
M&A
Artemis
September 16th, 2008 at 7:06 am
‘Ello! Ello! Ello! What be all this business about National Guardsmen then???
National Guardsmen ay! Oooo arrrr!
JO! I hope you don’t mind me asking for the millionth time - but how quickly could one get to the beach and back from where M disappeared? Sorry for keep forgetting this. LOL.
Please pass a message to Amal for me - Tell him I am filling in the blanks in now - thanks to his frank and matter-of-fact answers to journalists tec.
I so wish that the Clann would be as open and frank. There’s no secrecy laws to worry about now!
I wonder if K-Woman ever kicks herself for dropping so many bollocks when the police needed vital information in the first hours?
September 16th, 2008 at 6:07 am
Karen says: ‘Why all the nonsense about ‘it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’
……………………………………………………………………………….
I am not absolutely 100% positive about the answer to this but ………..
I believe that they wanted the World to believe that it was dead normal to go out to supper in the UK and leave a three-years old child in charge of herself and eighteen months old twins.
This could also be used in their defence if the PJ had ever dared to want to charge them and put them in prison forever and ever for leaving the children alone!
As we can see - it has worked! Lol! Coz they ain’t been charged yet! Not even by LP!!!
To propagate seeds like, ‘We were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’ into the minds of all other fellow humans that she may be alive and living with a family was errrrrr ……… just taking the piss really!
You know what Liverpudlians and Glaswegians are like!
No matter how serious something may be - they can always see the bright side of life!
In a nut-shell - the bit about there being no evidence of any harm being done is legal speak for - ‘Put up or shut up because we have got fucking brilliant legal eagles and they’ve said you can do fuck all without a body - and besides that - we are determined to make you get off our backs and leave us out of the equation”
So their protestations would appear to have been most correct and worthwhile - because the PJ did as they were told without a murmur - for months! LOL!
September 16th, 2008 at 5:41 am
Good Morning Karen!
I don’t think that there is any marked difference between the pair of them but I wouldn’t call them realistic or Pollyanna-like.
I can think of a couple of words that they may be - but I am not allowed to swear between 5.30am and 5.40am
September 16th, 2008 at 5:21 am
If Kate did feel all that guilt and pain - why not say that in public?
You don’t have to cry - you just have to say “I wish we hadn’t left the door unlocked, I wish we’d been there (the whole night - not just for that second)… I think she might be dead… I think she might have been taken by paedophiles…’
Why all the nonsense about ‘it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’
Is it a martial split? Is Kate the realistic one and Gerry the Pollyanna????
September 16th, 2008 at 4:15 am
ANORAK! Where did you get the pic of M in the space-ship from?
Is it in The Files?
Do we know when it was taken?
I am being deadly serious here - because I have been thinking since May 4th 2007 that it is possibly the only way M could have been taken away from PDL.
The six-feet amphibious sardine theory was quashed when a six-foot tall amphibious sardine came to my home one night and left a fishy streak all over the parquet which would not come off.
And when it finally did come off - there was still a feint stain in the wood.
However when the Aliens came and munched on my children - they did leave little splatters of blood all over the walls - which I assume must have happened as they chomped on my children - but there was not a single trace of Alien and nobody even saw where they parked the space-ship!
I actually witnessed one of the Aliens eating one of my 18 month old twins - but when they disappeared - there was not a trace!
I still feel very upset and remorseful about leaving the children whilst I was enjoying myself that afternoon with my girl-friends.
I hate myself for leaving the French windows slightly ajar in case there was a fire. - But I comfort myself in the knowledge that I could see four of my chimneys from the bistro that is just a couple of minutes walk from my house.
September 16th, 2008 at 4:11 am
goodnight, i may be backi tommoroow or may not depending on how p’d off i am or guilable. however that’s spellt.
September 16th, 2008 at 4:08 am
link at the bottom that is where it says image.
September 16th, 2008 at 4:05 am
the image has a url coco, leading to david thorpe who i presume is the artist/author.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:48 am
what the space photo ? eh ? well i suppose it could just as easily be.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:46 am
the diary is a lie coco, i read it’s been removed but i haven’t checked. re the evidence which isnt, can you be sure that’s genuine ? i can’t, i look at the dog videos and think well this or that isn’t right and i’ve no interest in hanging anyone if the stuff isn’t done right and it wasn’t. i can wiffle on all i like about them being good dogs but if the methods of collection aren’t done right then the whole things not right as far as i’m concerned. the clothes which the dogs sniffed out in the video came all out of one box, the items were not individually sealed against cross contamination from what i could see. the whole thing was for me moot from that point onwards. i didnt seeon the video anything to convince me of a proper scientific examination. i didn’t see if the gloves the handler was wearing were straight out of the packet, i could not see or understand all hand singnals, some did look leading to me. it would not stand up in court and quite rightly so i think that the dogs evidence has to be discounted. that with the obviously bogus diaries has annoyed me no end.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:32 am
Sam! Is the photo from the PJ Files?
September 16th, 2008 at 3:31 am
I am becoming so concerned about some of the posters on here. Why do they only come on to protest on behalf of two people that they allege they don’t know???
Sinister!
I can understand the Matts and the Sauls posting and engaging regularly because they are interested in filling in the blanks and want justice for M - but for grown men who allege they are coppers and such-like to come on here chucking loads of crap cut and pastes at us all the time about how we cannot rely on evidences is very. very, very, weird!
If you know what I mean! Which I am sure you do!
I’m doing a lot of real life this week so have had to catch up on the past couple of days and errrrrr ……. I just don’t get half of the posts!
September 16th, 2008 at 3:30 am
it wasn’t me, that’s a fact.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:28 am
who made it ? no, i don’t know.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:23 am
Sam! Hi! Of course!
Do you know who took the picture of M in the space-ship that heads this thread?
Anorak has not given me a sourece to verify.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:13 am
good morning coco, refreshing to see a bit opf breeze here. the diary is utter crap of course.
September 16th, 2008 at 3:04 am
PLEASE SCROLL PAST ME!!! - If you don’t like common sense or expletives!
Well. Well. Well.
The Diaries are revealing things which the Clannies must be cringing over.
No bloody wonder the Defence were trying to put a stop to the release of The Files.
Tut. Tut. Tut. What are the public to think of all this?
After all - they are certainly not written for public consumption or private perusal - and they are certainly not written with M in mind.
These diaries are written for the police and the Courts - without a doubt!
I am noting with disdain that there are some very peculiar posts from the Arse-Weedo types and their hangers-on. Their postings are most bizarre posts since the revelations of The Files.
Not one single poster is actually defending the Clan - They are merely denigrating the indicia and evidences that were actually found by the investigators.
Why not post something up that would actually defend the Clan???
Instead of discrediting the glaringly obvious facts and evidence???
I don’t give a flying fuck about whether we have psychologists, coppers or any other experts or mystics on here - what troubles me is the fuck-wittedness of people who think that they are helping the Clan by bouncing the very posters that want to ensure a full and proper investigation goes ahead.
If all the Fuck Wits and Arse-Weedos want to help the Clan - why don’t they want the Clan to answer certain questions???
Why do they not want the blanks filling in???
Most importantly - Why don’t they want to find M’s remains???
They never mention M!
They just want her parents to be cleared of any lingering doubts.
I’m not sorry if there are posters out there who still think I come across as aggressive because I chuck a swear-word in here and there - because it saves a lot of time in conveying my resentment and annoyance at the arrogance of other posters and the Clan themselves.
From what I have ever seen on this thread - it’s only the Arse-Weedos that come across as aggressive with their swear-words - never the decent posters.
September 16th, 2008 at 12:10 am
jass Says:
September 15th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Cheryl says:”Yes, she does and if you read her words slowly you can feel her ‘emotions’. ”
Cheryl, why did you put her ‘emotions’ in inverted commas?
___________
Leave it up to you, Jass! Lost my reading glasses and too lazy to run out and buy another pair and in the meantime can’t see any mistakes I type and squinting to read.
September 16th, 2008 at 12:07 am
PeterMac Says:
September 15th, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Only a BSc in Psychology I’m afraid. Durham University, 1972.
(Followed by LLB and an MA.)
——————-
Do you know what, I would never have admitted that! How embarrassing.
September 16th, 2008 at 12:02 am
Thatpoorpriest,
are you Father Pacheco’s twin brother?
September 15th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Watcher i didnt say that i think you have me muddled with someone else ?
September 15th, 2008 at 11:51 pm
Watcher Gone.
September 15th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Anybody got a link to the bit in SOS Madeleine? Quick, because I’m nodding off here.
September 15th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
I have my theories about the consul and the embassador.
Maybe more about the consul.
But I will not tell them here.
The consulate received the parents together with the PJ every week, for a chat.
Possibly the embassador did not expect the McCanns being made arguidos.The dogs, etc.
It could have been a schock for him and he gave up his carrier.
Desillusion, that could have been, I don’t know.
September 15th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
I wish you would explain it, doris. Or even give us a clue. You said it wasn’t the parents. One of the Tapas 7 perhaps? The dodgy one we are not allowed to talk about?
September 15th, 2008 at 11:43 pm
ze werete bit ? sorry ich bin nein turnern into ze german
September 15th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
F IT WE ARE ALL STILL HERE BUT HOW INFURIATING ! sorry forgot capitals werte on , some of you have got a grip of the real situation and some just cannot see it , and some in the wider sphere just are not aware of any of it which makes it so much more infuriating for the likes of us to try and explain , but all will come out in the wash !
September 15th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
So far not one mention of how they have tried tto look for her, other thn praying and visiting the Pope. NOTHING else. But maybe it is recorded on the paged we have not been shown.
I don’t understand why the diary starts BEFORE the child is ever missing and before she has been devised to write one - not only by Gerry’s sister, but also by the counsellor they had.
the last entry (I think) before it was seized talks about how happy M looked in the “last photo”. Just to put it in everyone’s minds that we are supposed to believe that this peculiar photo (with elbows disappearing) is actually the last one.
I really don’t want to sound unbeleiving, because clearly, KM is suffering greatly, but it’s hard not to. Also why write that she loves M more than any other person. What about the poor twinnies. They just seem to be tolerated.
September 15th, 2008 at 11:28 pm
must be time for another sighting surely.