<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Let&#8217;s Investigate Kate McCann&#8217;s Pain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: questions4goncalo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-381535</link>
		<dc:creator>questions4goncalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-381535</guid>
		<description>Why did you censor my post????

Of course the post was my opinion! What a joke this site is! As long as people support the crazy Amaral, their posts get put up without being edited.
--------
M&amp;A
Artemis
Sadly, however, you neglected to mention that the post reflected your opinion; instead you made claims of fact which you cannot support by evidence.
As for your claim about Amaral, no, they don't, as you would realise if you bothered to read the other posts on this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you censor my post????</p>
<p>Of course the post was my opinion! What a joke this site is! As long as people support the crazy Amaral, their posts get put up without being edited.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
M&#038;A<br />
Artemis<br />
Sadly, however, you neglected to mention that the post reflected your opinion; instead you made claims of fact which you cannot support by evidence.<br />
As for your claim about Amaral, no, they don&#8217;t, as you would realise if you bothered to read the other posts on this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: questions4goncalo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-381378</link>
		<dc:creator>questions4goncalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-381378</guid>
		<description>Kate McCann did not release her diary. [in my opinion] The edit PJ did. They released it without her permission [edit in my opinion] and it is not only a violation of her privacy but also a copyright violation. [in my opinion] If Kate WANTED to release her diary she could have made a lot of money from it. Instead  the News of the World cared more about making a quid than protecting her privacy or that of Madeleine. Those were her most intimate thoughts and shame on all of you for scrutinizing them like you had the right to read them! This is not a soap opera but real, living breathing people that have feelings. FGS, do you all have no shame? Or are you all heartless zombies without souls?
M&amp;A
Artemis

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate McCann did not release her diary. [in my opinion] The edit PJ did. They released it without her permission [edit in my opinion] and it is not only a violation of her privacy but also a copyright violation. [in my opinion] If Kate WANTED to release her diary she could have made a lot of money from it. Instead  the News of the World cared more about making a quid than protecting her privacy or that of Madeleine. Those were her most intimate thoughts and shame on all of you for scrutinizing them like you had the right to read them! This is not a soap opera but real, living breathing people that have feelings. FGS, do you all have no shame? Or are you all heartless zombies without souls?<br />
M&#038;A<br />
Artemis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380468</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380468</guid>
		<description>'Ello! Ello! Ello!  What be all this business about National Guardsmen then???

National Guardsmen ay! Oooo arrrr!

JO!   I hope you don't mind me asking for the millionth time - but how quickly could one get to the beach and back from where M disappeared? Sorry for keep forgetting this. LOL. 

Please pass a message to Amal for me - Tell him I am filling in the blanks in now - thanks to his frank and matter-of-fact answers to journalists tec.

I so wish that the Clann would be as open and frank.  There's no secrecy laws to worry about now!

I wonder if K-Woman ever kicks herself for dropping so many bollocks when the police needed vital information in the first hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Ello! Ello! Ello!  What be all this business about National Guardsmen then???</p>
<p>National Guardsmen ay! Oooo arrrr!</p>
<p>JO!   I hope you don&#8217;t mind me asking for the millionth time - but how quickly could one get to the beach and back from where M disappeared? Sorry for keep forgetting this. LOL. </p>
<p>Please pass a message to Amal for me - Tell him I am filling in the blanks in now - thanks to his frank and matter-of-fact answers to journalists tec.</p>
<p>I so wish that the Clann would be as open and frank.  There&#8217;s no secrecy laws to worry about now!</p>
<p>I wonder if K-Woman ever kicks herself for dropping so many bollocks when the police needed vital information in the first hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380464</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380464</guid>
		<description>Karen says:       'Why all the nonsense about ‘it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’
...........................................................................................

I am not absolutely 100% positive about the answer to this but ...........

I believe that they wanted the World to believe that it was dead normal to go out to supper in the UK and leave a three-years old child in charge of herself and eighteen months old twins. 

This could also be used in their defence if the PJ had ever dared to want to charge them and put them in prison forever and ever for leaving the children alone!  

As we can see - it has worked! Lol! Coz they ain't been charged yet! Not even by LP!!!

To propagate seeds like, 'We were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’ into the minds of all other fellow humans that she may be alive and living with a family was errrrrr  ......... just taking the piss really! 

You know what Liverpudlians and Glaswegians are like! 

No matter how serious something may be - they can always see the bright side of life!

In a nut-shell - the bit about there being no evidence of any harm being done is legal speak for - 'Put up or shut up because we have got fucking brilliant legal eagles and they've said you can do fuck all without a body - and besides that - we are determined to make you get off our backs and leave us out of the equation''

So their protestations would appear to have been most correct and worthwhile - because the PJ did as they were told without a murmur - for months! LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen says:       &#8216;Why all the nonsense about ‘it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I am not absolutely 100% positive about the answer to this but &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>I believe that they wanted the World to believe that it was dead normal to go out to supper in the UK and leave a three-years old child in charge of herself and eighteen months old twins. </p>
<p>This could also be used in their defence if the PJ had ever dared to want to charge them and put them in prison forever and ever for leaving the children alone!  </p>
<p>As we can see - it has worked! Lol! Coz they ain&#8217;t been charged yet! Not even by LP!!!</p>
<p>To propagate seeds like, &#8216;We were responsible parents, we think she’s alive and living with a family, there’s no evidence that she’s come to any harm…’ into the minds of all other fellow humans that she may be alive and living with a family was errrrrr  &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; just taking the piss really! </p>
<p>You know what Liverpudlians and Glaswegians are like! </p>
<p>No matter how serious something may be - they can always see the bright side of life!</p>
<p>In a nut-shell - the bit about there being no evidence of any harm being done is legal speak for - &#8216;Put up or shut up because we have got fucking brilliant legal eagles and they&#8217;ve said you can do fuck all without a body - and besides that - we are determined to make you get off our backs and leave us out of the equation&#8221;</p>
<p>So their protestations would appear to have been most correct and worthwhile - because the PJ did as they were told without a murmur - for months! LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380463</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380463</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Karen!

I don't think that there is any marked difference between the pair of them but I wouldn't call them realistic or Pollyanna-like. 

I can think of a couple of words that they may be - but I am not allowed to swear between 5.30am and 5.40am</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Karen!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that there is any marked difference between the pair of them but I wouldn&#8217;t call them realistic or Pollyanna-like. </p>
<p>I can think of a couple of words that they may be - but I am not allowed to swear between 5.30am and 5.40am</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380462</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 04:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380462</guid>
		<description>If Kate did feel all that guilt and pain - why not say that in public?

You don't have to cry - you just have to say "I wish we hadn't left the door unlocked, I wish we'd been there (the whole night - not just for that second)... I think she might be dead... I think she might have been taken by paedophiles...'

Why all the nonsense about 'it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she's alive and living with a family, there's no evidence that she's come to any harm...'

Is it a martial split? Is Kate the realistic one and Gerry the Pollyanna????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Kate did feel all that guilt and pain - why not say that in public?</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to cry - you just have to say &#8220;I wish we hadn&#8217;t left the door unlocked, I wish we&#8217;d been there (the whole night - not just for that second)&#8230; I think she might be dead&#8230; I think she might have been taken by paedophiles&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>Why all the nonsense about &#8216;it was like being the bottom of our garden, we were responsible parents, we think she&#8217;s alive and living with a family, there&#8217;s no evidence that she&#8217;s come to any harm&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>Is it a martial split? Is Kate the realistic one and Gerry the Pollyanna????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380456</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380456</guid>
		<description>ANORAK!    Where did you get the pic of M in the space-ship from? 

Is it in The Files? 

Do we know when it was taken? 

I am being deadly serious here - because I have been thinking since May 4th 2007 that it is possibly the only way M could have been taken away from PDL.

The six-feet amphibious sardine theory was quashed when a six-foot tall amphibious sardine came to my home one night and left a fishy streak all over the parquet which would not come off. 

And when it finally did come off - there was still a feint stain in the wood.

However when the Aliens came and munched on my children - they did leave little splatters of blood all over the walls - which I assume must have happened as they chomped on my children - but there was not a single trace of Alien and nobody even saw where they parked the space-ship! 

I actually witnessed one of the Aliens eating one of my 18 month old twins - but when they disappeared - there was not a trace!

I still feel very upset and remorseful about leaving the children whilst I was enjoying myself that afternoon with my girl-friends. 

I hate myself for leaving the French windows slightly ajar in case there was a fire. - But I comfort myself in the knowledge that I could see four of my chimneys from the bistro that is just a couple of minutes walk from my house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANORAK!    Where did you get the pic of M in the space-ship from? </p>
<p>Is it in The Files? </p>
<p>Do we know when it was taken? </p>
<p>I am being deadly serious here - because I have been thinking since May 4th 2007 that it is possibly the only way M could have been taken away from PDL.</p>
<p>The six-feet amphibious sardine theory was quashed when a six-foot tall amphibious sardine came to my home one night and left a fishy streak all over the parquet which would not come off. </p>
<p>And when it finally did come off - there was still a feint stain in the wood.</p>
<p>However when the Aliens came and munched on my children - they did leave little splatters of blood all over the walls - which I assume must have happened as they chomped on my children - but there was not a single trace of Alien and nobody even saw where they parked the space-ship! </p>
<p>I actually witnessed one of the Aliens eating one of my 18 month old twins - but when they disappeared - there was not a trace!</p>
<p>I still feel very upset and remorseful about leaving the children whilst I was enjoying myself that afternoon with my girl-friends. </p>
<p>I hate myself for leaving the French windows slightly ajar in case there was a fire. - But I comfort myself in the knowledge that I could see four of my chimneys from the bistro that is just a couple of minutes walk from my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380455</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380455</guid>
		<description>goodnight, i may be backi tommoroow or may not depending on how p'd off i am or guilable. however that's spellt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goodnight, i may be backi tommoroow or may not depending on how p&#8217;d off i am or guilable. however that&#8217;s spellt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380453</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380453</guid>
		<description>link at the bottom that is where it says image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>link at the bottom that is where it says image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380452</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380452</guid>
		<description>the image has a url coco, leading to david thorpe who i presume is the artist/author.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the image has a url coco, leading to david thorpe who i presume is the artist/author.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380451</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380451</guid>
		<description>what the space photo ? eh ? well i suppose it could just as easily be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the space photo ? eh ? well i suppose it could just as easily be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380450</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380450</guid>
		<description>the diary is a lie coco, i read it's been removed but i haven't checked. re the evidence which isnt, can you be sure that's genuine ? i can't, i look at the dog videos and think well this or that isn't right and i've no interest in hanging anyone if the stuff isn't done right and it wasn't. i can wiffle on all i like about them being good dogs but if the methods of collection aren't done right then the whole things not right as far as i'm concerned. the clothes which the dogs sniffed out in the video came all out of one box, the items were not individually sealed against cross contamination from what i could see. the whole thing was for me moot from that point onwards. i didnt seeon the video anything to convince me of a proper scientific examination. i didn't see if the gloves the handler was wearing were straight out of the packet, i could not see or understand all hand singnals, some did look leading to me. it would not stand up in court and quite rightly so i think that the dogs evidence has to be discounted. that with the obviously bogus diaries has annoyed me no end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the diary is a lie coco, i read it&#8217;s been removed but i haven&#8217;t checked. re the evidence which isnt, can you be sure that&#8217;s genuine ? i can&#8217;t, i look at the dog videos and think well this or that isn&#8217;t right and i&#8217;ve no interest in hanging anyone if the stuff isn&#8217;t done right and it wasn&#8217;t. i can wiffle on all i like about them being good dogs but if the methods of collection aren&#8217;t done right then the whole things not right as far as i&#8217;m concerned. the clothes which the dogs sniffed out in the video came all out of one box, the items were not individually sealed against cross contamination from what i could see. the whole thing was for me moot from that point onwards. i didnt seeon the video anything to convince me of a proper scientific examination. i didn&#8217;t see if the gloves the handler was wearing were straight out of the packet, i could not see or understand all hand singnals, some did look leading to me. it would not stand up in court and quite rightly so i think that the dogs evidence has to be discounted. that with the obviously bogus diaries has annoyed me no end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380448</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380448</guid>
		<description>Sam! Is the photo from the PJ Files?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam! Is the photo from the PJ Files?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-9#comment-380447</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380447</guid>
		<description>I am becoming so concerned about some of the posters on here. Why do they only come on to protest on behalf of two people that they allege they don't know???

Sinister!

I can understand the Matts and the Sauls posting and engaging regularly because they are interested in filling in the blanks and want justice for M - but for grown men who allege they are coppers and such-like to come on here chucking loads of crap cut and pastes at us all the time about how we cannot rely on evidences is very. very, very, weird! 

If you know what I mean! Which I am sure you do!

I'm doing a lot of real life this week so have had to catch up on the past couple of days and errrrrr ....... I just don't get half of the posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am becoming so concerned about some of the posters on here. Why do they only come on to protest on behalf of two people that they allege they don&#8217;t know???</p>
<p>Sinister!</p>
<p>I can understand the Matts and the Sauls posting and engaging regularly because they are interested in filling in the blanks and want justice for M - but for grown men who allege they are coppers and such-like to come on here chucking loads of crap cut and pastes at us all the time about how we cannot rely on evidences is very. very, very, weird! </p>
<p>If you know what I mean! Which I am sure you do!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing a lot of real life this week so have had to catch up on the past couple of days and errrrrr &#8230;&#8230;. I just don&#8217;t get half of the posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380446</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380446</guid>
		<description>it wasn't me, that's a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it wasn&#8217;t me, that&#8217;s a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380445</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380445</guid>
		<description>who made it ? no, i don't know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who made it ? no, i don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380443</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380443</guid>
		<description>Sam! Hi! Of course! 

Do you know who took the picture of M in the space-ship that heads this thread?

Anorak has not given me a sourece to verify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam! Hi! Of course! </p>
<p>Do you know who took the picture of M in the space-ship that heads this thread?</p>
<p>Anorak has not given me a sourece to verify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380442</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380442</guid>
		<description>good morning coco, refreshing to see a bit opf breeze here. the diary is utter crap of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good morning coco, refreshing to see a bit opf breeze here. the diary is utter crap of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380441</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380441</guid>
		<description>PLEASE SCROLL PAST ME!!!   - If you don't like common sense or expletives! 

Well. Well. Well.

The Diaries are revealing things which the Clannies must be cringing over.

No bloody wonder the Defence were trying to put a stop to the release of The Files.

Tut. Tut. Tut. What are the public to think of all this?

After all - they are certainly not written for public consumption or private perusal - and they are certainly not written with M in mind.

These diaries are written for the police and the Courts - without a doubt!

I am noting with disdain that there are some very peculiar posts from the Arse-Weedo types and their hangers-on. Their postings are most bizarre posts since the revelations of The Files.

Not one single poster is actually defending the Clan - They are merely denigrating the indicia and evidences that were actually found by the investigators. 

Why not post something up that would actually defend the Clan???

Instead of discrediting the glaringly obvious facts and evidence???

I don't give a flying fuck about whether we have psychologists, coppers or any other experts or mystics on here - what troubles me is the fuck-wittedness of people who think that they are helping the Clan by bouncing the very posters that want to ensure a full and proper investigation goes ahead.

If all the Fuck Wits and Arse-Weedos want to help the Clan - why don't they want the Clan to answer certain questions??? 

Why do they not want the blanks filling in???

Most importantly - Why don't they want to find M's remains???

They never mention M! 

They just want her parents to be cleared of any lingering doubts.

I'm not sorry if there are posters out there  who still think I come across as aggressive because I chuck a swear-word in here and there - because it saves a lot of time in conveying my resentment and annoyance at the arrogance of other posters and the Clan themselves. 

From what I have ever seen on this thread - it's only the Arse-Weedos that come across as aggressive with their swear-words - never the decent posters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE SCROLL PAST ME!!!   - If you don&#8217;t like common sense or expletives! </p>
<p>Well. Well. Well.</p>
<p>The Diaries are revealing things which the Clannies must be cringing over.</p>
<p>No bloody wonder the Defence were trying to put a stop to the release of The Files.</p>
<p>Tut. Tut. Tut. What are the public to think of all this?</p>
<p>After all - they are certainly not written for public consumption or private perusal - and they are certainly not written with M in mind.</p>
<p>These diaries are written for the police and the Courts - without a doubt!</p>
<p>I am noting with disdain that there are some very peculiar posts from the Arse-Weedo types and their hangers-on. Their postings are most bizarre posts since the revelations of The Files.</p>
<p>Not one single poster is actually defending the Clan - They are merely denigrating the indicia and evidences that were actually found by the investigators. </p>
<p>Why not post something up that would actually defend the Clan???</p>
<p>Instead of discrediting the glaringly obvious facts and evidence???</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t give a flying fuck about whether we have psychologists, coppers or any other experts or mystics on here - what troubles me is the fuck-wittedness of people who think that they are helping the Clan by bouncing the very posters that want to ensure a full and proper investigation goes ahead.</p>
<p>If all the Fuck Wits and Arse-Weedos want to help the Clan - why don&#8217;t they want the Clan to answer certain questions??? </p>
<p>Why do they not want the blanks filling in???</p>
<p>Most importantly - Why don&#8217;t they want to find M&#8217;s remains???</p>
<p>They never mention M! </p>
<p>They just want her parents to be cleared of any lingering doubts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sorry if there are posters out there  who still think I come across as aggressive because I chuck a swear-word in here and there - because it saves a lot of time in conveying my resentment and annoyance at the arrogance of other posters and the Clan themselves. </p>
<p>From what I have ever seen on this thread - it&#8217;s only the Arse-Weedos that come across as aggressive with their swear-words - never the decent posters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190056/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-lets-investigate-kate-mccanns-pain.html/comment-page-8#comment-380427</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190056#comment-380427</guid>
		<description>jass Says: 

September 15th, 2008 at 11:16 pm 
Cheryl says:”Yes, she does and if you read her words slowly you can feel her ‘emotions’. ”

Cheryl, why did you put her ‘emotions’ in inverted commas?

___________
Leave it up to you, Jass!   Lost my reading glasses and too lazy to run out and buy another pair and in the meantime can't see any mistakes I type and squinting to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jass Says: </p>
<p>September 15th, 2008 at 11:16 pm<br />
Cheryl says:”Yes, she does and if you read her words slowly you can feel her ‘emotions’. ”</p>
<p>Cheryl, why did you put her ‘emotions’ in inverted commas?</p>
<p>___________<br />
Leave it up to you, Jass!   Lost my reading glasses and too lazy to run out and buy another pair and in the meantime can&#8217;t see any mistakes I type and squinting to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
