<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: The News Of The World&#8217;s Sorry Apology For Tabloid Reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-385258</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-385258</guid>
		<description>Good to see you, âde.

The wheels are coming off the 'give me lots of money now' waggon to a remarkable degree; the Fragrant Duo's equity is no doubt so far down the hole that it may meet the Large Hadron Collider coming the other way, and Gerry's career in politics looks comprehensively screwed.

Which just goes to show that there always a ray of hope....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see you, âde.</p>
<p>The wheels are coming off the &#8216;give me lots of money now&#8217; waggon to a remarkable degree; the Fragrant Duo&#8217;s equity is no doubt so far down the hole that it may meet the Large Hadron Collider coming the other way, and Gerry&#8217;s career in politics looks comprehensively screwed.</p>
<p>Which just goes to show that there always a ray of hope&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: âde</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-385253</link>
		<dc:creator>âde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-385253</guid>
		<description>afternoon all
just dropping in briefly - i'm bored shitless by these odious low-life :lol:
the dna stuff is interesting
does it tell us something about why the odiates were so  touchy about the ivf treatment questions
such fun fun fun
is anyone still stupid enough to be donating to the mortgage fund?
and there's did you know murat? question that awaits an answer
i just love this charade :lol:

from christine's point... such nice parents to leave their babies alone in a PITCH DARK grubby little room
wretched bastards :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>afternoon all<br />
just dropping in briefly - i&#8217;m bored shitless by these odious low-life <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
the dna stuff is interesting<br />
does it tell us something about why the odiates were so  touchy about the ivf treatment questions<br />
such fun fun fun<br />
is anyone still stupid enough to be donating to the mortgage fund?<br />
and there&#8217;s did you know murat? question that awaits an answer<br />
i just love this charade <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>from christine&#8217;s point&#8230; such nice parents to leave their babies alone in a PITCH DARK grubby little room<br />
wretched bastards <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383825</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383825</guid>
		<description>That's a yes then.  Just changed my computer so didn't know whether if it would affect my ability to post on here.

The one thing that hasn't been discussed on any forum (that I know of) is that if the shutters were down it would have been pitch black - not a chink of light anywhere.  So, three kids would have been completely in the dark.  Any supposed checkers would not have seen a thing.  No mention of any of them turning on a light - in order for Gerry to see he was such a lucky man at having such a beautiful daughter.  I go to Spain about three times a year and as a brit I don't do these shutters.  I want to see some light from somewhere.  And I want to see the sky in the morning.  Just my way of living but I got stuck in a cellar in Geneva once without a key - got out but only by .......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a yes then.  Just changed my computer so didn&#8217;t know whether if it would affect my ability to post on here.</p>
<p>The one thing that hasn&#8217;t been discussed on any forum (that I know of) is that if the shutters were down it would have been pitch black - not a chink of light anywhere.  So, three kids would have been completely in the dark.  Any supposed checkers would not have seen a thing.  No mention of any of them turning on a light - in order for Gerry to see he was such a lucky man at having such a beautiful daughter.  I go to Spain about three times a year and as a brit I don&#8217;t do these shutters.  I want to see some light from somewhere.  And I want to see the sky in the morning.  Just my way of living but I got stuck in a cellar in Geneva once without a key - got out but only by &#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383820</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383820</guid>
		<description>Can I still post here?

-----
M&amp;A
Artemis
I know of no reason why you should think otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I still post here?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
M&#038;A<br />
Artemis<br />
I know of no reason why you should think otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrsT</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383540</link>
		<dc:creator>MrsT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383540</guid>
		<description>By jove Rasputin - you're good at this copy and paste lark.

I read the 3A's as well   :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By jove Rasputin - you&#8217;re good at this copy and paste lark.</p>
<p>I read the 3A&#8217;s as well   <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383532</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383532</guid>
		<description>The FSS document states that of those 19 components, 15 are present within the result of the analysis to that specific sample. &lt;b&gt;But the total number of components is 37, &lt;/b&gt;because there are at least three contributors, may be up to five, in the sample.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FSS document states that of those 19 components, 15 are present within the result of the analysis to that specific sample. <b>But the total number of components is 37, </b>because there are at least three contributors, may be up to five, in the sample.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383530</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383530</guid>
		<description>As it is front page news at almost every British newspaper, it's interesting to know with more detail what the scientists from Forensic Science Service told Portuguese police, on September 4, 2007, a few days before Gerry and Kate McCann were named "arguidos." 

According to a document from FSS, signed by Mr. J.R. Lowe, analysis to the samples collected at the boot of the Renault Scenic produced a complex Low Copy Number DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people. Madeleine's DNA profile had 19 elements, each one represented by a peak on a chart, explains Mr. Lowe. 

As Madeleine has inherited a same DNA component from both parents, the number of peaks in the chart is 19, instead of 20. Those 2 components appear, in the chart, as only one peak. 

The FSS document states that of those 19 components, 15 are present within the result of the analysis to that specific sample. But the total number of components is 37, because there are at least three contributors, may be up to five, in the sample.

Mr. J.R. Lowe's opinion was that the result is too complex to have a meaningful interpretation or conclusion.

But, concerning the question asked, when the samples were sent to FSS – if it could be or not Madeleine's DNA – the FSS scientist admits that it would be very simple to say yes, because of the number of components, within the sample, that are also present in Madeleine DNA profile – 15 over 19.

However, as Mr. J.R. Lowe emphasizes, in the mentioned document, the scientists need to consider if the match is genuine and legitimate. Meaning, to be sure if either Madeleine's DNA was deposited in the car or if the result matched Madeleine's DNA just by chance. 

To explain in more detail this question, the FSS scientist reminds that individual components of Madeleine's DNA are also present within the profile of many of the scientists that work in the Birmingham laboratory. Mr. Lowe even refers to his own DNA profile, as an evidence of that. 

As the sample analysed has a mixture of elements from more than two persons, it is not possible, according to the FSS expert, to determine or evaluate which specific components pair with each other. Another difficulty mentioned is the fact that it's not possible to separate the components out into three individual DNA profiles.

As a conclusion, Mr. J.R. Lowe wrote that he could not answer the question if the partial match was genuine or just a chance match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it is front page news at almost every British newspaper, it&#8217;s interesting to know with more detail what the scientists from Forensic Science Service told Portuguese police, on September 4, 2007, a few days before Gerry and Kate McCann were named &#8220;arguidos.&#8221; </p>
<p>According to a document from FSS, signed by Mr. J.R. Lowe, analysis to the samples collected at the boot of the Renault Scenic produced a complex Low Copy Number DNA result which appeared to have originated from at least three people. Madeleine&#8217;s DNA profile had 19 elements, each one represented by a peak on a chart, explains Mr. Lowe. </p>
<p>As Madeleine has inherited a same DNA component from both parents, the number of peaks in the chart is 19, instead of 20. Those 2 components appear, in the chart, as only one peak. </p>
<p>The FSS document states that of those 19 components, 15 are present within the result of the analysis to that specific sample. But the total number of components is 37, because there are at least three contributors, may be up to five, in the sample.</p>
<p>Mr. J.R. Lowe&#8217;s opinion was that the result is too complex to have a meaningful interpretation or conclusion.</p>
<p>But, concerning the question asked, when the samples were sent to FSS – if it could be or not Madeleine&#8217;s DNA – the FSS scientist admits that it would be very simple to say yes, because of the number of components, within the sample, that are also present in Madeleine DNA profile – 15 over 19.</p>
<p>However, as Mr. J.R. Lowe emphasizes, in the mentioned document, the scientists need to consider if the match is genuine and legitimate. Meaning, to be sure if either Madeleine&#8217;s DNA was deposited in the car or if the result matched Madeleine&#8217;s DNA just by chance. </p>
<p>To explain in more detail this question, the FSS scientist reminds that individual components of Madeleine&#8217;s DNA are also present within the profile of many of the scientists that work in the Birmingham laboratory. Mr. Lowe even refers to his own DNA profile, as an evidence of that. </p>
<p>As the sample analysed has a mixture of elements from more than two persons, it is not possible, according to the FSS expert, to determine or evaluate which specific components pair with each other. Another difficulty mentioned is the fact that it&#8217;s not possible to separate the components out into three individual DNA profiles.</p>
<p>As a conclusion, Mr. J.R. Lowe wrote that he could not answer the question if the partial match was genuine or just a chance match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383528</link>
		<dc:creator>annie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383528</guid>
		<description>Of course, if the spirit did not want to pass over, like someone who dies suddenly and does not want to pass to the other side - then I suppose it would be possible.  They remain in limbo until they are shown the way.  There have been lots of reports of the spirits of people who die suddenly and maybe want to hold onto their family - watching their children grow etc. and do not actually go to rest.  This could be the case with a child spirit I suppose.  Not wanting to leave its family - so I suppose that a limbo spirit could appear very early after death - I dont know, but I suppose if Madeleine is no longer alive, then her spirit could be waiting around for direction.  So sad wouldnt it be - if that were the case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, if the spirit did not want to pass over, like someone who dies suddenly and does not want to pass to the other side - then I suppose it would be possible.  They remain in limbo until they are shown the way.  There have been lots of reports of the spirits of people who die suddenly and maybe want to hold onto their family - watching their children grow etc. and do not actually go to rest.  This could be the case with a child spirit I suppose.  Not wanting to leave its family - so I suppose that a limbo spirit could appear very early after death - I dont know, but I suppose if Madeleine is no longer alive, then her spirit could be waiting around for direction.  So sad wouldnt it be - if that were the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383527</link>
		<dc:creator>annie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383527</guid>
		<description>Maravilha Says: 

September 23rd, 2008 at 12:34 am 

I would seriously doubt it - but if you think that way, then God bless you.  Madeleine - if she had passed to the other side, surely would not yet be able to visit - spirits have to mature (not the malt type, I might add!!)  The spirit of a child would not under normal circumstances return to haunt so soon - would it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maravilha Says: </p>
<p>September 23rd, 2008 at 12:34 am </p>
<p>I would seriously doubt it - but if you think that way, then God bless you.  Madeleine - if she had passed to the other side, surely would not yet be able to visit - spirits have to mature (not the malt type, I might add!!)  The spirit of a child would not under normal circumstances return to haunt so soon - would it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maravilha</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383526</link>
		<dc:creator>Maravilha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383526</guid>
		<description>The British Consul to Portimão retired on July 2007.

His substitute, a lady, followed him and stopped her carrier one year later, prefering to take care of her children.(Why exactly chosing the children?).

The Brish ambassador to Portugal abandonned his diplomatic carrier a few days before the couple were made arguidos.

Could it be that Madeleine's spirit was visiting them, that's why they took distance of diplomacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Consul to Portimão retired on July 2007.</p>
<p>His substitute, a lady, followed him and stopped her carrier one year later, prefering to take care of her children.(Why exactly chosing the children?).</p>
<p>The Brish ambassador to Portugal abandonned his diplomatic carrier a few days before the couple were made arguidos.</p>
<p>Could it be that Madeleine&#8217;s spirit was visiting them, that&#8217;s why they took distance of diplomacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yampster</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383521</link>
		<dc:creator>yampster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383521</guid>
		<description>Totje,

The lads are having a well deserved night off</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totje,</p>
<p>The lads are having a well deserved night off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totje</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383517</link>
		<dc:creator>Totje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383517</guid>
		<description>Sam a couple of months ago that was the mantra of some posters : pictures of Madeleine [esp. the one know as 'the last picture' = the picture on the pool in PdL] was/were photoshopped. ;) 

To me she looks like a normal/happy/naughty girl on  lot o pictures I've seen
So it's all in the eyes of the beholder....

Have to go to work early tomorrow, so I'm off.
Nite nite, sleep well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam a couple of months ago that was the mantra of some posters : pictures of Madeleine [esp. the one know as 'the last picture' = the picture on the pool in PdL] was/were photoshopped. <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>To me she looks like a normal/happy/naughty girl on  lot o pictures I&#8217;ve seen<br />
So it&#8217;s all in the eyes of the beholder&#8230;.</p>
<p>Have to go to work early tomorrow, so I&#8217;m off.<br />
Nite nite, sleep well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-18#comment-383515</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383515</guid>
		<description>why would the mccanns photoshop pictures of maddie totje ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would the mccanns photoshop pictures of maddie totje ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Totje</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383514</link>
		<dc:creator>Totje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383514</guid>
		<description>Of course not, they are photoshopped. :lol: 
And it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; suspicious how all the people that really knew her discribed her as a happy girl.

Yampster, are we on strike? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not, they are photoshopped. <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
And it <i>is</i> suspicious how all the people that really knew her discribed her as a happy girl.</p>
<p>Yampster, are we on strike? <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383513</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383513</guid>
		<description>coco Says: 
September 22nd, 2008 at 10:17 pm
[...]

There is absolutely no spontaneity in any pic that I am aware of.
****
So we share the same feeling.
I really have to sign off.
Good night, Coco, Yampster [silk :-) ], Grande F. [apt 5C "interesting"], Sam, et al
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coco Says:<br />
September 22nd, 2008 at 10:17 pm<br />
[...]</p>
<p>There is absolutely no spontaneity in any pic that I am aware of.<br />
****<br />
So we share the same feeling.<br />
I really have to sign off.<br />
Good night, Coco, Yampster [silk <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ], Grande F. [apt 5C "interesting"], Sam, et al<br />
 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383512</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383512</guid>
		<description>good night chatelaine :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good night chatelaine <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383511</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383511</guid>
		<description>coco, oh to be a diplomat :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coco, oh to be a diplomat <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yampster</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383510</link>
		<dc:creator>yampster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383510</guid>
		<description>Châtelaine

The silken sheets are a given by now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Châtelaine</p>
<p>The silken sheets are a given by now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383509</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383509</guid>
		<description>sam Says: 
September 22nd, 2008 at 10:14 pm
***
Sam, she does like shy/frightened/uneasy, eager to PLEASE. 
That's what I read in most of the photos [we know].

Good night :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sam Says:<br />
September 22nd, 2008 at 10:14 pm<br />
***<br />
Sam, she does like shy/frightened/uneasy, eager to PLEASE.<br />
That&#8217;s what I read in most of the photos [we know].</p>
<p>Good night <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grande Finale</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/190558/tabloids/madeleine-mccann-the-news-of-the-worlds-sorry-apology-for-tabloid-reporting.html/comment-page-17#comment-383508</link>
		<dc:creator>Grande Finale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=190558#comment-383508</guid>
		<description>Châtelaine Says: 

September 22nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm 
****************
I have to go too but I saw your post yesterday re-Apartment 5C

The two sisters saw a couple of blonde men in trunks on the balcony one morning, but it was supposed to be empty. I Haven't heard anything else since..........

Back Later xx

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-504950/British-witnesses-We-saw-blond-men-balcony-Madeleine-apartment.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Châtelaine Says: </p>
<p>September 22nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm<br />
****************<br />
I have to go too but I saw your post yesterday re-Apartment 5C</p>
<p>The two sisters saw a couple of blonde men in trunks on the balcony one morning, but it was supposed to be empty. I Haven&#8217;t heard anything else since&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Back Later xx</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-504950/British-witnesses-We-saw-blond-men-balcony-Madeleine-apartment.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-504950/British-witnesses-We-saw-blond-men-balcony-Madeleine-apartment.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
