My understanding also is that anyone coming forward with info leading to the conviction of the perpetrators has not at any stage stood receive a penny in reward money. There we have the difference.

THIS TO ME IS STRANGE.

Within days of the Antigua shootings a reward was offered for information on who did it. This happens all the time. Why has no one thought of doing it in the Maddy case?

September 26th, 2008 at 4:57 pm
Chenier, it was just an example, there are many ways in which a reward can bring positive results.

With hindsight a lot of money that has been used following dead ends might have been better utilised in this way.

The whole point, Rasputin, being that such a move might YIELD some evidence.
********************
When 2.5 million Euros reward didn’t find her dead or alive, (is it still on offer ?) nothing will, and I think most of the brighter posters on here know why, don’t they ?

Talking of fund money wasted, when the Spanish Tecs said they would have her home by Christmas and the Mccons had employed them. Why would they then dissapear to Yorkshire ? shouldn’t they have been expecting to greet her at home ?

Another example being someone who is not a hardened criminal but they know something, wrestling with their conscience as to whether or not to spill the beans, a seven figure sum might help them make that decision.

With hindsight a lot of money that has been used following dead ends might have been better utilised in this way.

The whole point, Rasputin, being that such a move might YIELD some evidence.

IF the general public started to google ( madleine mc cann majorca)

They might have a shock

September 26th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
so i guess the majorca sighting and no comment from the mccanns means more bad news due to come out.
************************
Wonder if it’s an attempt to hide the previous Majorca allegations ? maybe they are about to hit the british press ? No-one seems to have refuted them so far have they ?

September 26th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I think you enjoy yanking far more than I do your contribution here is nothing so you might as well go somewhere else and yank. There is plenty of evidence but obviously the old wifes tales of yanking is true in your case - it makes you go blind.
********************
LOL

I’ll bet Ras pukings dad wished he’d had a yyank instead…………….

Do you like the girl spinning records in lones video

And let’s imagine someone gets caught with pedo porn, a bit like that vicar on the news yesterday, but this someone has info about a network connected to Maddy’s disappearance.

That person could be given a choice, either:

1. Three years in jail and a criminal record, or
2. Immunity, protection and three million quid.

————–

I’m all for the exercise of imagination, but the entire plan does hinge on there being a network connected with the disappearance of Madeleine.

And I know of no such network, and neither do the people charged with investigating paedophile crimes around the world….

So even if you offered a cartload of dosh to anyone caught with images of child abuse on his computer, it’s unlikely that you would get a truthful response; there is a massive incentive for the person to make up as many lies as possible in the hope of cutting a deal.

Incidentally, CEOPs asks that people do not use the term porn in connection with images of child abuse…

September 26th, 2008 at 3:39 pm
Time to let go silly billies, get on with your life’s, how many times can the same mantra be regurgitated, move along don’t look back.

The story is in its death throes.
***************************
What an unfortunate turn of phrase Ras pukin.

A missing infants case is never closed, investigations continue !

Call that justice, cos I don’t.