at the moment it is no use to re open the investigation unless some

other things present in the investigation would be used.

If I understood it well, the PJ based the conclusion on the negative results and according to I don’t remember who, there were enough positive things to start a process.

I don’t know if it was possible. I did not see the DVD.
to start a process.

Huge surprise that!

October 6th, 2008 at 10:24 pm
That Poor Priest – I haven’t missed any points but I wish you would show me where Kate went to shops and had her hair done the day after Madeleine went missing.

————————————————————————————————————
Well you have missed the point because you are implying it is OK to dress up tiny children in adult sey clothes, for mini pageants, because they grow up OK in the end.

And who said anything about Kate doing shopping “the day after M went missing”? noone said that. She was in Portugal for months, so she didn’t always have to wear her holiday clothes.

I couldn’t help noticing that every shot of kate, that I saw, showed her in low cut vest tops often with bra showing, furthermore, any cardigans worn, always had strategically undone buttons at the top. It must have been a “look in the mirror” thing to decide how far she could unbutton her tops. Nothing wrong with that at all, I absolutely agree, I’m sure we have all done it thousands of times when getting ready to go out, or trying on various outfits in shops. But IMO very odd for someone who believes her child is with paedophiles.

lots of sites have M photos in make up and strange poses.

Châtelaine : it had nothing to do with Noord-Brabant.
This is Totje :
http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff265/totje2004/DSC00196.jpg

Even wearing vacation clothes and earrings seems to be suspicious

“The photos of Jon Benet Ramsey and her ilk make me cringe”

I personally cant care less how sthe mccannwoman dresses or not.In my little eyes what she wears is fairly common,honestly.Nothing very fancy in fact,she has poor tastes and could be a bit more “flamboyant” may be…..?
I wont come down on you with a ton of bricks but I promise you I wont left any stones unturned either and I …..dont

You do not need a body to find someone guilty of Murder. It merely makes the process a little more difficult for the prosecution.

I keep hearing people saying this but where is it in black and white and from a reliable source? I would surmise she had her highlights done before she went on holiday, and I assume she quickly bought a suitable outfit to meet the Pope.

I haven’t seen any pictures of Madeleine taken with make up and in odd positions. Like to give me a link?

Endless stories of my having home perms, Jass! One little story?

You do have an imagination don’t you? Try and reign it in a little.

Good evening posters, lurkers …

And that’s exactly how it should be IMO

According to Amaral, the result of work carried out by his team and several British police officers is recorded in the reports of the investigation and as long as they are not destroyed, there is always the possibility to bring the investigation to a successful conclusion: “it would only take one of the nine friends to decide to talk…”

The former coordinator of the investigation into Madeleine McCann’s disappearance states that it is still possible to find out the truth, stressing that the investigation from a legal point of view is neither finished nor closed: it is only waiting for better evidence and it is necessary for those who are able to to bring new details to the Portuguese authorities.

Duarte Levy (Vigo – Espagne)

It’s great that some kids treated like that, seem to grow up OK. But something happened to Maddie therefore many people want to look at her background for clues.

Don’t kid yourself that poor Kate only had access to her holiday clothes! she went to loads of shops, got her hair done etc, so that is a red herring. They were living off the funds that people donated for their general living expenses if you remember. Did she only have access to her holiday clothes when she went back home?

Madeleine – on the other hand was not in tht siuation – unless ‘privately’.

I do agree how-ever – her hair style is not indicative of anything.

Or is that sort of stuff normal in your home?

As for ordinary children, I myself, as a small child was the object of constant primping sessions from my 19 year old cousin, who curled my hair and put make up on me and then brought me in to see the grown ups who all oohhed and aaahed!

Have to say I had a normal childhood, well looked after etc etc. My mother gave me the occasional home perm that invariably went frizzy.

It is quite fun to prettify little girls, if they like it (and most of them do) I refuse to see anything “evil” in the fact that at some point someone plaited Madeleine’s wet hair and when it dried it came out crimped looking.

As far as Kate’s clothes go, she was wearing her summer holiday clothes and never seemed to be flaunting herself in any way.

Just my opinion of course, and I expect Jo will come down on me like a ton of bricks. Heigh Ho.