
Madeleine McCann: Labour And The Nazis
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann, Kate McCann and Gerry McCann
TRIBUNE (Magazine) “an independent weekly labour movement voice”
A new book is out: “BOOKS: Why Charles Lindbergh went to meet with Hermann Goering” - The Immortalists: Charles Lindbergh, Dr Alexis Carrel and Their Daring Quest to Live Forever, by David M Friedman
Goering and Madeleine McCann… There is a link. Knew it…
MOST people know two things about Charles Lindbergh. One: in 1927 he became the first person to fly non-stop from New York to Paris. And two: five years later his baby son was kidnapped and murdered.
Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. Oh, and he invented the electric guitar, suffered from bi-polarism and once ate 17 pickled eggs in a minute. Go on..:
The first event made him the most famous man on the planet, the prototype celebrity of the mass media age, a victim of ticker-tape parades, celebrity tours and the flashbulb’s glare. The second reignited that hysteria, but subtly changed the tone. After the murder, Lindbergh’s heroic status was stained with darkness and suspicion. Some crazies even accused the bereaved couple of killing their own child (thus grotesquely foreshadowing the case of Madeleine McCann).
Chapter 2: Charles mistakes a billiard ball for a pickled eggs with hilarious consequences…
Madeleine McCann: Reading Amaral’s Book, Free Speech And Elvis
Johannes Heesters Brings Nazi Nostalgia To Holland
A Nazi Business For Max Mosley, Bahrain And The Germans
There Are Nazis In The Bottom Of My Garden
Posted: 8th, October 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (424) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





October 10th, 2008 at 7:37 am
Do they need this article when they should really focus on Duarte Levy dont you think?
October 10th, 2008 at 7:36 am
Good morning
So ….an other spin coming up Raspy? what does it hide?
About draining tax payers….err…your friends the mccCons are rather good at it,aint they?
October 10th, 2008 at 7:16 am
http://tinyurl.com/3ohul6
October 10th, 2008 at 7:15 am
It must be true, a Portuguese chappie makes the claims, and it is in the Sun.
October 10th, 2008 at 7:11 am
Lucky, what a strange sentiment in a case involving a missing child, I believe you may be draining the tax payers purse at university, you must be taking a Masters in stupidity, which no doubt you will pass with flying colours.
October 10th, 2008 at 7:03 am
Your point is ?, as usual pointless.
October 10th, 2008 at 5:10 am
Rasputin,
Er, the fact they left their kids completely alone with the patio door unlocked… which means some of us disapprove of them… and libel doesn’t come into it cos it is an opinion about an admitted act???
And they’re lucky they did it in PDL… some woman in Britain is apparently going to be charged with manslaughter and child neglect for being asleep in the same house when her kids came to harm…
October 10th, 2008 at 3:42 am
Some posters ignorance of the law is only surpassed by their ignorance of all things worldly, “IMO allegedly anti Mary said I read it somewhere I heard I am only repeating” is no defence against a charge of libel.
Mr Levy’s site was swiftly removed from the domain of a server who are within the reach of English law, after a much publicised alleged correspondence from Carter to said Mr Levy.
As for facts about Mr Amaral, why hasn’t his famed exposure of the truth been published in the UK, do you really need to be told the simple answer.
The other facts are as follows, no arguidos and no evidence of any involvement in any crime by any of the former arguidos, have I missed “any facts”
October 10th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Some lazy lunchtime thoughts…….
……….The McCanns have supposedly settled out of court with several newspapers.
I am a little suspicious.
Was there a list published of printed matter that was treated as libellous?
Which libellous statements were attributed to which paper?
Or was it just an overall payout for undisclosed libel for each of the accused?
I’m thinking, and this is my opinion, thought up by myself (so no more bullying replies from Artemis please, just do your job delete this if you have to or want to, no problem). Because I’m also wondering if Anorak has been brought to a certain extent, or maybe funded? could be a better word, but that’s another topic, sort of. So these are my thoughts on the suing…..
IMO……..To me it is obvious that the parents have had political help, wether directly or through wealthy backers, reason as yet unknown.
These helpers have also in my opinion been responsible for my perception of the dire and unbalanced newspaper/television/radio reporting that the British public has been subject too, somehow creating a mine of misinformation gleefully published without retraction.
So, these same helpers persuade the media to release some material that could be seen to be upsetting and faintly libellous to the McCanns who will threaten to sue.
The media backs down and (in a prearranged senario IMO) is seen to settle out of court.
In reality the helpers were slipping sections of the media the money to pay the McCanns and a good backhander for hush money. Did the money go into the fund I wonder?
So it could be the media realised they would have to pay Murat too and this (ficticious)payout to the McCanns set a benchmark, limiting Murats claim. I think if Murat had sued first he might have got quite a bit more. So that was another incentive for the media to swallow the McCann bullet as they knew Murat was coming to get them too.
So my overall thoughts and opinion are that the McCanns sued themselves, paid themselves and in doing so courting public sympathy, apparently showing all that accusations were lies. Would guilty people sue? They must be innocent. It also served to put other media on red alert some who are now so frightened of legal action, that sometimes they actually oppose the very rights they promote. Fear is a wonderful thing.
As I have stated above, this is all my twisted opinion only.
-agw Willo. One of the joys of being a UK resident is the confident and sure knowledge the Judiciary are independent. Independent of politics and politicians, crime and criminals and prosecution and plaintive. They judge. The situations you refer to were agreements and no judges would ratify such an agreement unless they were totally satisfied it was a just and fair thing. In both the McCann and Murat agreements there can be NO doubt the payments avoided a costly trial and, in the opinion of the media’s own lawyers, a hefty settlement and punitive costs awartds. The right and wrongs of that are neither here nor there the media involved agreed it was wrong to print what it did
The suggestion that Anorak has made a similar sort of agreement is both wrong and grossly offensive.
There is no need to make agreements if no offence has been given or allowed.
October 10th, 2008 at 12:39 am
Saki? do you mean Hector Hugh Munro or Japanese food?? lol
October 10th, 2008 at 12:36 am
fantastic attitude annie :), really off now
October 10th, 2008 at 12:35 am
night sam -
October 10th, 2008 at 12:34 am
I might pop in occasionally to see if there are any developments - I always take my lap top with me, but never seem to have the time to switch it on ! I hope that with all the gloom and doom in the financial markets, there are a few out there who are prepared for a gamble. I think that the American people are in for a real gamble if they vote in Obama - but the alternative, well, - anyway, it is really none of my business - I should be more concerned about the UK - but quite honestly I have had enough of the lot and I intend to do what I want to do, every single day from now on - bugger the lot of them!!..
October 10th, 2008 at 12:33 am
have fun then annie, i’m off to watch some saki before turning in, good night
October 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Be back in a couple of weeks - got a good deal to Vegas - off tomorrow night , and I will be throwing my hard earned pension onto the Poker tables by Sunday. I will come back cursing every American that ever walked and swear I will never go there again - but I will - I need the buzz!!
October 10th, 2008 at 12:28 am
hi annie
October 10th, 2008 at 12:21 am
hello
October 10th, 2008 at 12:06 am
coco
Its terrible isnt it ,the pages,the posts numbers,the fact I had to scroll down to the ast post….a mess!
I am off to bed.Heavy week ahead
Bye Chatelaine
Coco,
There will not be a happy ending because Madeleine has gone and will never come back
but I know what you are saying,yes : the bastards will get done
Sleep well xxxx
October 10th, 2008 at 12:03 am
coco Says:
October 9th, 2008 at 11:59 pm
‘Tis true Chatelaine! You are led instinctively - you will not have the wool pulled over your eyes!
***
“Famous last words”: ’tis true, Coco, definitely no wool over my eyes
October 10th, 2008 at 12:02 am
Châtelaine
Mercury,the holder of light,the runner,the quick silver
Good night
Sleep tight
I will be off soon
October 10th, 2008 at 12:01 am
What is going on with these fucking pages on here???
I must bid you all good night until the morrow! Hang in their Jo - there will be a comfortable ending to all this.
XXXX
October 10th, 2008 at 12:00 am
coco
“….- but that we are not in any way, shape or form allowed to question the fuckers!”
*****
Yes we are.At least british citizen are and should pest the LP to make them open an inquest.”You” should pest the social services and challenge all your institutions and their people/representants
I always say England needs a revolution.It is becoming necessary to put a stop to this very developed “elite” concept which has been hammered in people”s conciousness since the darkest ages …. royals and emperors are…err… in the the past
October 9th, 2008 at 11:59 pm
All others, Jo & Coco, having gone silent, and me having these heavy days ahead, I really call it a day or rather a night. Bye
October 9th, 2008 at 11:59 pm
‘Tis true Chatelaine! You are led instinctively - you will not have the wool pulled over your eyes!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Cadaveri and Cadaverina are the new must-have dollies Jo! I have written a song about them - just got to get the out-fits right!!!
I think they will be wearing …………….. cadaver-scented Summery outfits!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:56 pm
coco Says:
October 9th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Geminis of course have a Mercurial quickness of mind - and woe betides anybody on the wrong side of what they see to be right!
***
Yeah …?????
October 9th, 2008 at 11:54 pm
Geminis of course have a Mercurial quickness of mind - and woe betides anybody on the wrong side of what they see to be right!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:53 pm
Châtelaine Says:
October 9th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
Something not quite right … errr … even clear to Gemini, Coco.
If they’d really sue Paulo Reis, think we should all support, as I cannot remember anything libelous in what he’s done
****
Of course not.
Look at it like this: an other smoke screen
Originally,they wanted to sue Amaral and they dropped it.Then we had a timid fury over Amarals interview in Vigo.It all went poof! poof! ..and now we had have Paolo Reis episod …let them do it,let them do it….
October 9th, 2008 at 11:52 pm
jo Says:
October 9th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
***
True, Jo. We’ve been talking about one child because she was all over the news for “ages” and there was “something” strange about the case. I do realise that there are many, many more out there we don’t know, or not enough about. But they all deserve, at least, justice.
October 9th, 2008 at 11:52 pm
Just read your last post Jo and I must admit that I am very uncomfortable with the fact that we have a very serious case of injustice to M - but that we are not in any way, shape or form allowed to question the fuckers!
Even our Royalty can be asked bloody questions! There is something absolutely unprecedented in every way about this shower of sh*te and I am buggered as to why???
I cannot remember a case that has ver gripped me as badly - and it’s because of all the fucking about and the massive media campaign that they themselves launched - It’s fucking mind-blowingly, staggeringly NOT RIGHT!!
October 9th, 2008 at 11:49 pm
coco Says:
October 9th, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Bon nuit Chatelaine! Make sure all the gardeners are in bed - and that the villagers aren’t training their binoculars on you! lol
***
LOL
It’s well after midnight here. They’re about to get up in a couple of hours. It’s safe