<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: FBI, Psychics And The Daily Express Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anaheim flash</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392205</link>
		<dc:creator>anaheim flash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392205</guid>
		<description>See - Today it all becomes more clear....

Just been browsing our glorious tabloids - thats 'Tabloids' - not 'hemorrhoids' - The one thats hot and has a big red banner across the front - they say 'Britains most popular' .... etc.

Anyway - 

Seems that things are all falling into place..

Kate was apprehensive about going on the holiday ? This corroborrated by FP &amp; DP - but thats another story....

A 'woman' once claimed to MOD to be from a distant galaxy - released files - but MOD did not believe her.

how-ever MOD did scramble a jet to attack a UFO over Norfolk some time back - and the Italian jet almost had a crash at Heathrow.....

So I must say that the poster suggesting 'Alien abduction' - was perhaps nearer the mark than any of us so far - Perhaps Clarrie can go and investigate that.....

Its obvious - they came back to get Maddie !!!!! - Oh sorry 'Madeleine' 

Why else would Kate be apprehensive about a 'Group' holiday with the Paynes.......... I wonder - all that assistance at bed-time.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See - Today it all becomes more clear&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just been browsing our glorious tabloids - thats &#8216;Tabloids&#8217; - not &#8216;hemorrhoids&#8217; - The one thats hot and has a big red banner across the front - they say &#8216;Britains most popular&#8217; &#8230;. etc.</p>
<p>Anyway - </p>
<p>Seems that things are all falling into place..</p>
<p>Kate was apprehensive about going on the holiday ? This corroborrated by FP &amp; DP - but thats another story&#8230;.</p>
<p>A &#8216;woman&#8217; once claimed to MOD to be from a distant galaxy - released files - but MOD did not believe her.</p>
<p>how-ever MOD did scramble a jet to attack a UFO over Norfolk some time back - and the Italian jet almost had a crash at Heathrow&#8230;..</p>
<p>So I must say that the poster suggesting &#8216;Alien abduction&#8217; - was perhaps nearer the mark than any of us so far - Perhaps Clarrie can go and investigate that&#8230;..</p>
<p>Its obvious - they came back to get Maddie !!!!! - Oh sorry &#8216;Madeleine&#8217; </p>
<p>Why else would Kate be apprehensive about a &#8216;Group&#8217; holiday with the Paynes&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. I wonder - all that assistance at bed-time&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392204</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392204</guid>
		<description>loco - why would I have to do back flips?   I want to know what happened to Madeleine.  Whoever is responsible for her "vanishing" I will be HAPPY when that person in brought to justice.  

And Pam, no continents, I'm thinking more a free ride on the next space mission.  One that has to spend several years collecting data and sending it back to earth before disintegrating.

Anyway, loco's here, so I'm off.  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loco - why would I have to do back flips?   I want to know what happened to Madeleine.  Whoever is responsible for her &#8220;vanishing&#8221; I will be HAPPY when that person in brought to justice.  </p>
<p>And Pam, no continents, I&#8217;m thinking more a free ride on the next space mission.  One that has to spend several years collecting data and sending it back to earth before disintegrating.</p>
<p>Anyway, loco&#8217;s here, so I&#8217;m off.  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392200</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392200</guid>
		<description>Okay, guys, how many of the continents do we have covered? We have to devise some kind of lottery, and the loser must take Coco!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, guys, how many of the continents do we have covered? We have to devise some kind of lottery, and the loser must take Coco!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392199</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392199</guid>
		<description>The Real Stink Says: 

October 20th, 2008 at 1:09 am 
I see you are heavily into the piss again Loco. How much so far, only half a bottle?
.....................................................................................

Just proves how much of a Smart-Arse you are then! 

I happen to have a very serious case starting tomorrow. I am going to have to adjourn it - so I am making sure that I have prepared all the reasons to do so.

I don't get pissed when I am working. But when I do - I must admit - I am far more eloquent than yourself, Real Stink. 

My word - one has written more tripe in the past few days than one has written in a jolly long time. 

Watch out for the Wotcha-Head-Case when she has to do back-flips. She is not a light-weight woman - and I do not think that you should be trifling with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Real Stink Says: </p>
<p>October 20th, 2008 at 1:09 am<br />
I see you are heavily into the piss again Loco. How much so far, only half a bottle?<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Just proves how much of a Smart-Arse you are then! </p>
<p>I happen to have a very serious case starting tomorrow. I am going to have to adjourn it - so I am making sure that I have prepared all the reasons to do so.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get pissed when I am working. But when I do - I must admit - I am far more eloquent than yourself, Real Stink. </p>
<p>My word - one has written more tripe in the past few days than one has written in a jolly long time. </p>
<p>Watch out for the Wotcha-Head-Case when she has to do back-flips. She is not a light-weight woman - and I do not think that you should be trifling with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392198</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392198</guid>
		<description>I see you are heavily into the piss again Loco.  How much so far, only half a bottle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you are heavily into the piss again Loco.  How much so far, only half a bottle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392195</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392195</guid>
		<description>JO! LOL! 

I am too young to wear Tena-Lady but I will have to buy some for when I am reading Anorak 


jo Says: 

October 19th, 2008 at 8:14 pm 
Châtelaine 

We should also not forget that the dogs can not IDENTIFY to WHOM either scent belongs …
******
ah…if they only could speak!
They are trained to IDENTIFY smells and Eddie did.He did actually identify the smell on Madeleines t-shirt….not on the twins not on anyone esle apart for the mccannwomans clothes….in a sense,yes they do identify dont they?
Now do you think Madeleine has been playing with a cadaver previous to her vanishing?
! LOL

................................................................................

Playing with a cadaver .............. LOL! 

BUT - WHAT IF SHE HAD BEEN????????????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JO! LOL! </p>
<p>I am too young to wear Tena-Lady but I will have to buy some for when I am reading Anorak </p>
<p>jo Says: </p>
<p>October 19th, 2008 at 8:14 pm<br />
Châtelaine </p>
<p>We should also not forget that the dogs can not IDENTIFY to WHOM either scent belongs …<br />
******<br />
ah…if they only could speak!<br />
They are trained to IDENTIFY smells and Eddie did.He did actually identify the smell on Madeleines t-shirt….not on the twins not on anyone esle apart for the mccannwomans clothes….in a sense,yes they do identify dont they?<br />
Now do you think Madeleine has been playing with a cadaver previous to her vanishing?<br />
! LOL</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Playing with a cadaver &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. LOL! </p>
<p>BUT - WHAT IF SHE HAD BEEN????????????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392194</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392194</guid>
		<description>FUCKING HELL!  Please may I have the right to bear arms in the UK!!!

The Real Stink Says: 

October 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pm 
Watcher is quite correct about the reconstruction being pointless. It could not possibly uncover new evidence. Some of you are very brave with your ‘I would have returned’ bravado. I am with Watcher. The minute I became aware the Police did not believe ‘our’ story, and it became clear they therefore had no intention in looking for the abductor ‘we’ knew there to be, I would have stopped cooperating with them.

If the PJ really wanted a reconstruction, why did they not do one much earlier on, when everyone was still in PDL? Why wait until they had all returned to the UK? Very stupid of them to miss the opportunity - don’t you think? - and expect people to disrupt their lives even further.

They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim..........................................

........................................................................

No fucking wonder Judges and Coppers end up being so fucking corrupt when they have to deal with criminal minds and critics like these fuckers all day long!

THE RECONSTRUCTION WOULD HAVE BLOWN THEIR THEORISING AND TIME-LINES  APART - YOU FUCKING ARSE-WIPE.

I am definitely fucking emigrating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FUCKING HELL!  Please may I have the right to bear arms in the UK!!!</p>
<p>The Real Stink Says: </p>
<p>October 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pm<br />
Watcher is quite correct about the reconstruction being pointless. It could not possibly uncover new evidence. Some of you are very brave with your ‘I would have returned’ bravado. I am with Watcher. The minute I became aware the Police did not believe ‘our’ story, and it became clear they therefore had no intention in looking for the abductor ‘we’ knew there to be, I would have stopped cooperating with them.</p>
<p>If the PJ really wanted a reconstruction, why did they not do one much earlier on, when everyone was still in PDL? Why wait until they had all returned to the UK? Very stupid of them to miss the opportunity - don’t you think? - and expect people to disrupt their lives even further.</p>
<p>They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>No fucking wonder Judges and Coppers end up being so fucking corrupt when they have to deal with criminal minds and critics like these fuckers all day long!</p>
<p>THE RECONSTRUCTION WOULD HAVE BLOWN THEIR THEORISING AND TIME-LINES  APART - YOU FUCKING ARSE-WIPE.</p>
<p>I am definitely fucking emigrating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392193</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392193</guid>
		<description>BOUNTYHUNTERS! Hope the cats settle. I have missed you and have asked about you.

Stay around when you can! XX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOUNTYHUNTERS! Hope the cats settle. I have missed you and have asked about you.</p>
<p>Stay around when you can! XX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392192</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392192</guid>
		<description>What a pile of bollocks, tripe and trash has been written in the past couple of days!!! 

And now I'm here ..... Hrrrrmmmmmpphhhh! lol

SpongeyBobby still has a runny bum and is endlessly dripping the same droplets of bugger-all into his posts.

I have seen more back-tracking on here in the past couple of days than I have seen for a while. 

Still - in the longest of long games - there can appear to be a stale-matey kind of thingy going on - and I guess it will outrage the ludicrously stupid Fuck-Wits on here - who in my expert judgement haven't got a clue how to use the deductive powers God gave them!

That Watcher is a head-case - she should call herself Wotcha-Head-Case! LOL!

I cannot recall a poster whose head was so far up their own arse since Arseputin used to use that Olde Englishe Sh*tey rhetoric about Monns and cavities and bats and Banshees - or whatever the fuck it was .... lol.

Who uses the dead and the sick to justify their cheap talk on a news site???

Did we hear Trevor McDonald telling us that his Mother died whilst he was on the stage one night?

NO! Because the show must go on! So stop talking sh*te Wotcha - and get a life beyond your virtual Idiot Gang on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a pile of bollocks, tripe and trash has been written in the past couple of days!!! </p>
<p>And now I&#8217;m here &#8230;.. Hrrrrmmmmmpphhhh! lol</p>
<p>SpongeyBobby still has a runny bum and is endlessly dripping the same droplets of bugger-all into his posts.</p>
<p>I have seen more back-tracking on here in the past couple of days than I have seen for a while. </p>
<p>Still - in the longest of long games - there can appear to be a stale-matey kind of thingy going on - and I guess it will outrage the ludicrously stupid Fuck-Wits on here - who in my expert judgement haven&#8217;t got a clue how to use the deductive powers God gave them!</p>
<p>That Watcher is a head-case - she should call herself Wotcha-Head-Case! LOL!</p>
<p>I cannot recall a poster whose head was so far up their own arse since Arseputin used to use that Olde Englishe Sh*tey rhetoric about Monns and cavities and bats and Banshees - or whatever the fuck it was &#8230;. lol.</p>
<p>Who uses the dead and the sick to justify their cheap talk on a news site???</p>
<p>Did we hear Trevor McDonald telling us that his Mother died whilst he was on the stage one night?</p>
<p>NO! Because the show must go on! So stop talking sh*te Wotcha - and get a life beyond your virtual Idiot Gang on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392191</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392191</guid>
		<description>Chatelaine
et al.

Innocence demands the right to speak out
Guilt demands the right to silence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chatelaine<br />
et al.</p>
<p>Innocence demands the right to speak out<br />
Guilt demands the right to silence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392190</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392190</guid>
		<description>Hi! X</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! X</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-13#comment-392189</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 23:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392189</guid>
		<description>1. Given the option, and having clearly been the intended victim of coercion, I would have absolutely chosen not to go back.

2. Given a subpoena/ warrant/ legal document of any kind, I would have had no choice.

3. While I have seen several of the group question the value of any unfilmed
 "reconstruction " A YEAR AFTER THE CHILD'S DISAPPEARANCE, I have yet to see anything like an official invitation or demand, nor have I seen any formal and final response. The idea that a discrepancy of five-minutes in the testimony of a dozen people might be a.) critical to the case's solution, and b.) resolved on some cockeyed assumption that memory IMPROVES WITH TIME,  is NUTS.

4. I take all this to mean that this was yet another smokescreen--a way to malign the character and motives of the group without providing anything at all concrete.

5. And that sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Given the option, and having clearly been the intended victim of coercion, I would have absolutely chosen not to go back.</p>
<p>2. Given a subpoena/ warrant/ legal document of any kind, I would have had no choice.</p>
<p>3. While I have seen several of the group question the value of any unfilmed<br />
 &#8220;reconstruction &#8221; A YEAR AFTER THE CHILD&#8217;S DISAPPEARANCE, I have yet to see anything like an official invitation or demand, nor have I seen any formal and final response. The idea that a discrepancy of five-minutes in the testimony of a dozen people might be a.) critical to the case&#8217;s solution, and b.) resolved on some cockeyed assumption that memory IMPROVES WITH TIME,  is NUTS.</p>
<p>4. I take all this to mean that this was yet another smokescreen&#8211;a way to malign the character and motives of the group without providing anything at all concrete.</p>
<p>5. And that sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392187</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392187</guid>
		<description>Watcher Says: 
October 19th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
I have just re-watched Jane Tanner’s interview and she didn’t giggle,[...] And now I’m away to bed. :*
***
So you didn't see  her curling lips not the glimmer in her eyes nor the constant shaking [negative] of her head, while making a [positive] statement?

:-* 2u2 :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watcher Says:<br />
October 19th, 2008 at 10:50 pm<br />
I have just re-watched Jane Tanner’s interview and she didn’t giggle,[...] And now I’m away to bed. :*<br />
***<br />
So you didn&#8217;t see  her curling lips not the glimmer in her eyes nor the constant shaking [negative] of her head, while making a [positive] statement?</p>
<p>:-* 2u2 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392186</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392186</guid>
		<description>I have just re-watched Jane Tanner's interview and she didn't giggle, her testimony was clear and the diagram shown by the Panorama programme showed her clearly walking on the other side of the road to Gerry and his friend - who if engrossed in conversation, would not have any reason to notice her go by.

Nah!  I'm not buying their guilt at the moment.  And now I'm away to bed.  :*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just re-watched Jane Tanner&#8217;s interview and she didn&#8217;t giggle, her testimony was clear and the diagram shown by the Panorama programme showed her clearly walking on the other side of the road to Gerry and his friend - who if engrossed in conversation, would not have any reason to notice her go by.</p>
<p>Nah!  I&#8217;m not buying their guilt at the moment.  And now I&#8217;m away to bed.  :*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392185</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392185</guid>
		<description>Rasputin Says: 
October 19th, 2008 at 10:44 pm
You mistake my support for justice, with your own tainted bigoted views.
***
If I may say so [in case you "exist"], you mistake my support for justice too.
And I can assure you that I am neither tainted nor bigoted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasputin Says:<br />
October 19th, 2008 at 10:44 pm<br />
You mistake my support for justice, with your own tainted bigoted views.<br />
***<br />
If I may say so [in case you "exist"], you mistake my support for justice too.<br />
And I can assure you that I am neither tainted nor bigoted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392184</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392184</guid>
		<description>You mistake my support for justice, with your own tainted bigoted views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mistake my support for justice, with your own tainted bigoted views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392183</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392183</guid>
		<description>The Real Stig Says: 
October 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
[...] They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim.
****
There's no such thing as a "discourteous whim" in the case of a missing child!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Real Stig Says:<br />
October 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pm<br />
[...] They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim.<br />
****<br />
There&#8217;s no such thing as a &#8220;discourteous whim&#8221; in the case of a missing child!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392182</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392182</guid>
		<description>jass Says: 
October 19th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
[...] I do wonder how people like Rasputin can support the McCanns. [...]
***
Rasputin is a not a person; he's someone's character to keep us busy here ;-)
Nite again :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jass Says:<br />
October 19th, 2008 at 10:32 pm<br />
[...] I do wonder how people like Rasputin can support the McCanns. [...]<br />
***<br />
Rasputin is a not a person; he&#8217;s someone&#8217;s character to keep us busy here <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Nite again <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Real Stig</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392181</link>
		<dc:creator>The Real Stig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392181</guid>
		<description>Watcher is quite correct about the reconstruction being pointless.  It could not possibly uncover new evidence.  Some of you are very brave with your 'I would have returned' bravado.  I am with Watcher.  The minute I became aware the Police did not believe 'our' story, and it became clear they therefore had no intention in looking for the abductor 'we' knew there to be, I would have stopped cooperating with them.

If the PJ really wanted a reconstruction, why did they not do one much earlier on, when everyone was still in PDL?  Why wait until they had all returned to the UK?  Very stupid of them to miss the opportunity - don't you think? - and expect people to disrupt their lives even further.

They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watcher is quite correct about the reconstruction being pointless.  It could not possibly uncover new evidence.  Some of you are very brave with your &#8216;I would have returned&#8217; bravado.  I am with Watcher.  The minute I became aware the Police did not believe &#8216;our&#8217; story, and it became clear they therefore had no intention in looking for the abductor &#8216;we&#8217; knew there to be, I would have stopped cooperating with them.</p>
<p>If the PJ really wanted a reconstruction, why did they not do one much earlier on, when everyone was still in PDL?  Why wait until they had all returned to the UK?  Very stupid of them to miss the opportunity - don&#8217;t you think? - and expect people to disrupt their lives even further.</p>
<p>They were treating the McCanns and Tapistas like yoyos to be jerked back at a discourteous whim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Châtelaine</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/192869/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-fbi-psychics-and-the-daily-express-reports.html/comment-page-12#comment-392180</link>
		<dc:creator>Châtelaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=192869#comment-392180</guid>
		<description>Rasputin Says: 
October 19th, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Châtelaine, you are the best reason in a long time for filling in the Channel Tunnel.
****
It should never have been there in the first place, Rasputin.
May I reciprocate your wish, though, and hope you'll never ever again get that easily over here on the continent. 

Only advantage of the tunnel for me would have been [naughty, naughty] to send some rabies infected foxes to your island and get revenge for our pets being quarantined for 6 months after crossing the channel ... ;-)  :-)  :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasputin Says:<br />
October 19th, 2008 at 10:24 pm<br />
Châtelaine, you are the best reason in a long time for filling in the Channel Tunnel.<br />
****<br />
It should never have been there in the first place, Rasputin.<br />
May I reciprocate your wish, though, and hope you&#8217;ll never ever again get that easily over here on the continent. </p>
<p>Only advantage of the tunnel for me would have been [naughty, naughty] to send some rabies infected foxes to your island and get revenge for our pets being quarantined for 6 months after crossing the channel &#8230; <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
