Comments on: Caylee Anthony: Making Money From A Missing Child

By: coco

coco — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:46:05 +0000

I am not a well person!!!

I cannot cope with thinking that I have been tricked by this fucking thread thingy fuck-about. Why can’t this thread come up first?

By: coco

coco — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:43:48 +0000

If anybody comes on here - please will you let me know on the other thread X

By: kim montgomery

kim montgomery — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:16:30 +0000

BURNS MY BUTT! If they want to pay someone, offer the money to Tim Miller, of Texas Equasearch. He deserves it!

May they find Caylee and bring her home so she can be put to rest the right way.

By: sunshine

sunshine — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:20:40 +0000

Ok.. did it ever occur to you that this may be costing them thousands of dollars in the first place to find Caylee. They could putting that money to good use anyway. I would give them the benifit of the doubt because its their only grandaughter! Come on now! Grow up! A little girl is missing and you’re having a hard time understanding that they might need to that money to put someone in a hotel to help find her. Did it occur to you that they may be in serious debt right now and that they could honestly use the money! Why dont we talk about the national search for a missing little girl and the fact that their daughter has been leing out her ass for the last 4 months! Lets not waste precious time steaming over 5000.00 when they have spent a couple hundred thousand on this case since the beginning trying to find her!

By: Montaillou

Montaillou — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:35:13 +0000

OK I’ve got my off-shore enterprise set up, it’s called Whoosh Clunk Junior Inc, all i need to do is star merketing it, think I’ll start along the most popular holiday resorts in southern Europe, who’s for the Algarve? I’, going to have a nice little herd of hyenas to ward off invaders and absolutely NO sniffer dogs ad NO DNA merchants in sight. I was inclined to have a big media campaign to launch it to the wider masses starting in places like Dewsbury and Florida but on reflection I think it might be better to carry out a dicrete operation for discerning professionals, perhaps starting in the Midlands UK where ther appears to be a rich vein of opportunity. I shall offere a package deal including PR, photographic, legal and financial services for the customers (parents) with original strap lines like ‘no stone unturned’ and excellent accommodatin services for the secondary customers (children), guaranteed suitable for princes and princesses. The only difficulty I foresee is achieving a variety of different abduction themes so that the customers do no run too high a risk of being arrrested for being involved in their own child’s disappearance. But then so long as they get the story one right as per my instructions they shouold be fine. A few friends in high places wouldn’t come amiss though.

By: coolandcalm

coolandcalm — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:53:48 +0000

And of course, the case hasn’t gone to trial yet.

By: Lisa

Lisa — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:31:27 +0000

It’s amazing to me that any news organization would pay these [in my view] monsters so they can profit from the possible death of their granddaughter at the hands of the daughter they raised. I’m sure this ex-cop turned security guard (George) and nurse on disability (Cindy) may be thinking the disappearance of little Caylee is not such a bad thing after all, as all they have to do is go on TV, spew their nonsense, and make hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that’s before any million dollar book deals are signed (and believe me they will be signed). There needs to be some sort of law put on the books that NO ONE can profit from a crime, not the alleged perpetrator or any one else. That will assure that there is no motivation to commit the crime or to obstruct justice. If I ever see another crazy Anthony family member, or any other person, giving a paid interview regarding the murder of another person, I for one will turn it off and then start writing my letters of disapproval and boycott to every news media outlet, and their advertisers, that allowed such an outrage to occur.

——-
M&A
Artemis
Lisa, please bear in mind that Anorak is hosted in the UK and that it is subject to the laws of this country on defamation. I have therefore edited your post.

By: chenier

chenier — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:17:54 +0000

Sadly, a cyber security awareness month is going to do nothing to help children like Caylee; perhaps if people stopped going for ‘flavour of the month’ initiatives, and got back to practical questions as to how we can best help endangered children, those children would be a great deal better off.

It is never wise to give officialdom the chance to look as if they are doing something, when we want them to actually do something…

By: Grande Finale

Grande Finale — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:53:38 +0000

OCTOBER IS NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY AWARENESS MONTH

http://www.webwisekids.org/index.asp

By: doris

doris — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:08:55 +0000

very well thought about ! wish you well in your venture , just make sure the children are treated well and never left alone , oh and do return them after suitable period such as when you have accrued ludicrously large sums of money

By: Montaillou

Montaillou — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:05:10 +0000

I’m on my way to register my company name but I won’t set it up as a charity even though it is for a very worthy cause, becasue setting it up that way would make the operation subject to a lot of interfering scrutiny fromt the charity commissioner. Might register it off shore when I think about it. bbl lol

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:54:05 +0000

People in this world thrive on another’s tragedy! Newspapers can’t print enough editions when a headline story carried is of a tragedy. Not surprising a major TV network gave her money for an exclusive - to carry that story with an exclusive will send their ratings through the ceiling.

Thus, , newspapers, magazines, major TV networks pay for an exclusive on another’s tragedy. However, the public buy the newspapers, magazines, pay cable costs to watch TV networks - they too willing pay to watch another’s tragedy.

By: doris

doris — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:47:23 +0000

nowyou have ruined it , you have told everyone and they will allbe on bandwagon , best register asap and get patent etc

By: Montaillou

Montaillou — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:44:15 +0000

Nonsense, think positive. This is an enterprise opportunity - set up a business to disappear people’s kids, assist them with the PR, fund raising, legal fees, etc, but it could be an ethical enterprise, arranging exceptionally good child care of the ‘treated like a princess’ type and after a suitable interval once sufficient funds have been generated and the parents achieved a low profiel the child could be ‘found’, thos egeneratign further ‘tell us your story’ fund raising opportunities. I’m for it, let’s go…

By: doris

doris — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:19:08 +0000

David , nice to see that there are actually normal people out there

By: David

David — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:12:12 +0000

I agree completely doris

By: doris

doris — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:11:16 +0000

This is now fast becoming a very good recession beating way of making money and as far as i can see it is very dangerous as sending wrong message out to all unscrupulous people who may wish to leave their kids ,” lose your kid and get paid enough to pay your mortgage or no need to work again , yeah free for all , all kinds of idiots will GIVE you money for the story of the loss of your child ” effing mental

By: chenier

chenier — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:36:36 +0000

OK, I’ll say the obvious; that is sickening.

On the other hand America is the Home of the Free, so maybe ABC News was just trying to uphold the Constitution…