Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Noticing Tony Bennett, Madeleine’s Law And What Crime

By: peter campbell

peter campbell — Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:52:47 +0000

surly as the locherbie case is being solved by the TRUTH? SO SHALL THIS CASE ? THE TRUTH NEVER DIES? ONLY PEOPLE

By: on2u

on2u — Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:18:39 +0000

moderator
libellous????
To whom???
I am sure you are correct in assuming Bennet is under scrutiny!!! As he should be…He has cashed in on an unfortunate situation. He is just as libel as the whole digusting group of pariah’s. How dare he accuse an innocent priest for his own selfish reasons. his dislike or aversion to catholics. He belongs in the same dumpster as the McCann’s and their entourage.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:22:00 +0000

I thought the witness statements said they ate outdoors on the patio? Either way, doesn’t change anything.

By: Matt.

Matt. — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:37:01 +0000

Pamela Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 11:18 pm

Indeed.

He would have needed to break a hole in the roof in order to “see” the
apartment.

But he could not have “seen” it, in any sort of “security” sense from inside the
very well lit Tapas Restaurant at night.

The Tapas has long windows, stretching along it’s length on the side facing the
apartment, and if sitting right by the window you would only see reflections
from within the Tapas and even a person standing a yard or two outside would
barely be seen, never mind someone over 300 feet away.

Dr G P’s little story of their “only being 40 yards away, just like being in their
back garden, and they could see clearly across to the apartment that night”,
sounds extremely contrived, misinformative and deceitful.

Sounds like he in in a very serious state of denial.

By: Rasputin

Rasputin — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:24:00 +0000

Another Justice less day for Madeleine, as the crackpot theory merchants peddle their nonsense. Two possibilities only.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:08:16 +0000

But you said it.

By: willo

willo — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:32:07 +0000

Pamela Says : But, um, wouldn’t that be a GOOD thing?

Hey Pam. That’s exactly what a moron WOULD say.

By: Mo

Mo — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:44:18 +0000

I’m glad to see most people think there’s something terribly wrong with the McCanns version of events .. they just couldn’t wait to offload their three children every chance they got .. poor, poor kids .. dumped in the creche… then left alone in a strange bed on a ‘Family Holiday’ .. hang your heads in shame Drs. McCann ..

MODS and ADMIN
Grace

Unfortunately, there has not been a referendum on the public’s opinion and we cannot be sure that everybody would agree with you Mo. Please read Anorak’s threads which hold very mixed and diverse views on this subject to understand what I mean by this.

By: Pamela

Pamela — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:19:41 +0000

“Pamela you are a sad excuse for a moron…”

But, um, wouldn’t that be a GOOD thing?

By: Pamela

Pamela — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:18:47 +0000

Garth, I know! It’s like shooting fish in a barrel.

You know, here we have a saying for when an overweight gal has worn something too tight: Looks like she’s shoved twenty pounds of something into a ten pound sack! Now I have this new corollary: He’s on a ten-foot ladder in an eight-foot room! : )

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:10:49 +0000

Garth Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Dont worry about it ladies. Willys’ post just gets put to the bottom of the pile.
Probably best place really…..
***
Nice try. But this was really weird and I would be very interested to know how it is possible.

Meanwhile I’ll join Chenier, not with a Glenlivet, but a nice Marc de Bourgogne and then make it to bed too.

By: Garth

Garth — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:08:11 +0000

willo Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 11:05 pm

Pamela Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 8:15 pm

Yes, I’m a family member–the McCann’s have TONS of relatives in north Alabama, or hadn’t you heard? We’re all just this close and wearing tartan.

Why you wear tartan is beyond me but I hope you enjoyed your relatives visit when they popped over the ditch.

Pamela you are a sad excuse for a moron in fact moron would be a form of praise for you.
Now go back to screen printing t-shirts for the fund. You are making even the McCanns look clever!
——-

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:07:52 +0000

Back to the future! It worked …
Good night, Chenier

By: Garth

Garth — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:06:59 +0000

Dont worry about it ladies. Willys’ post just gets put to the bottom of the pile.

Probably best place really…..

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:06:22 +0000

Yep
it worked
but I’m still ahead of Willo …

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:05:28 +0000

If I post at 11:50 pm [real time] I should get in here at 11:05 pm
unless my calculation’s wrong

Don’t worry Chenier
I’m having fun playing card on the computer while waiting

By: chenier

chenier — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:03:41 +0000

Chatelaine

Willo’s post is after all of yours, but you are replying to it.

This is seriously weird; I am going to pour a stiff Glenlivet and head for bed, in the hope that things will make more sense in the morning……

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:00:20 +0000

I can see this post:
quote
willo Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
Pamela Says:
October 27th, 2008 at 8:15 pm

Yes, I’m a family member–the McCann’s have TONS of relatives in north Alabama, or hadn’t you heard? We’re all just this close and wearing tartan.

Why you wear tartan is beyond me but I hope you enjoyed your relatives visit when they popped over the ditch.

Pamela you are a sad excuse for a moron in fact moron would be a form of praise for you.
Now go back to screen printing t-shirts for the fund. You are making even the McCanns look clever!
unquote

since almost 40 minutes
yet it doesn’t show in Recent Comments
AND every which one of my subsequent posts comes BEFORE Willo’s

FYI it’s 11:45 pm now

By: Châtelaine

Châtelaine — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:55:26 +0000

Chenier 10:51 [= 11:40], can you see Willo’s post at 11:05????

By: chenier

chenier — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:51:22 +0000

Chatelaine

We put the clocks back on Sunday, which has made Anorak time evn less connected to reality than usual, but the not seeing posts until after you have replied to them is weird even for Anorak.

I dare say someone will turn up and provide a suitable conspiracy theory in due course…