October 30th, 2008 at 1:18 am
………………………………………………………….

I think I understand what you mean and the basic truths are that there are at the very least, two people who know what happened to Madeleine, that is Madeleine herself (1) and the person who took her (2), it is clear after all, that she did not wander off by herself.

We then have the possibility of a third person (3) who may have been working with (2) and, unless they were just opportunists, there may be (4++++++++) others in a possible syndicate who may have also been working with even more others, so it isn’t as if nobody at all knows what happened to the child. The trouble is, with the passage of time, whereas initially there may have been a weak link who might have just broken under pressure, it is now too far down the line and they will all be happy in the knowledge that they have got away with it.

The only way now that she will be “discovered” is by accident i.e. someone stumbling over her remains, as I doubt very, very much if she is still alive as there would then be too many “jumpy” people who still would know where she is and who still might bend under pressure and the lure of any rewards, presumably there is still money left to pay such a thing ? Is there still a “Madeleine Fund” ? if so how much is in it now I wonder ?

I don’t think each person told it to 5 people.Each person told it to one person and that one person told it to another one person,etc etc.By now, there must be a lot of people who know the truth or at least a part of it.We don’t know what happened to her.If at least two people know what happened, very many people know it already.

We have to wait.

Since then I have passed the internet info on to several friends who also have become hooked.

I was thinking, if each person told 5 people and they in turn did the same etc. very soon , so many people would begin to see the light, that people pressure would reopen the case and charges would at last be made. Or, at the very least, the silent 7 would be compelled to break the pact imposed upon them, just so that they could prove their own innocence, and not have a loud over their heads.

On the McC files there are three different drawn plans of Maddie’s bedroom and one photo taken through the window after the police had finished their inspection. All three drawings show the door opening different ways, two inwards hinged either on the left or the right and one showing it opening outwards - this latter matches the photo so far as one can see. The interesting thing is that only one version (door opening inwards with Maddie’s bed behind the door) woould allow MO’s story to be true, that he could see the twins but not M. According to the photo where the door opens outwards he would actually have seen Maddie before the twins as he pulled the door open.

If as the photo suggests the door opened outwards then it would have to have been slammed if at all by the draught from the patio doors, in which case it would have been yanked from KM’s hands as she went to shut it - some draught?!

Perhaps it was a virtual door or an ever-changing door, like those fascinating oldfashioned note clips which clamped the notes whicever way you opened them by an interesting arrangement of digonal straps? OK I’m wittering but it’s late and it’s quiet around here tonight.

October 29th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
B.t.w. she said the same thing as PeterMac: follow the money …
******************
Very wise Bless her