
Sachs Before Marriage: Georgina Baillie Has Russell Brand’s Nose
IF Russell brand has achieved nothing else, it is to have helped the Daily Mail define the phrase “Having Your Cake And Eating It”.
Anorak has featured the offending message, enabling BBC licence fee payers to be offended and outraged at their own convenience. The BBC is at the multi-media cutting edge.
Outraged by the man’s sick, dirty, filthy, porno (did we say filthy?) stunt, the Mail focuses on Georgina Baille.
That’s her on the Mail’s website.
On a plus side, it’s good to see that though a sexually active woman, and a member of the Satanic Sluts burlesque ensemble, Ms Baillie is able to enjoy a game “I’ve Got Your Nose”…
Last one to the swing is a Rosser…
Image: submitted by a reader; if false, do tell and we will remove it…
The story so far:
Russell Brand And Child Star In Live Sex Broadcasting Storm
Russell Brand Is The Vegetarian’s Starter Kit
Jonathan Ross Telethon: BBC Talent Donates Salary To Good Causes
Taxi For Piers Morgan: Washing Jonathan Ross’s Dirty Letters In Private
Russell Brand Was Once With The BNP
Hamsters for Brand
Madeleine McCann: Jonathan Ross, A Chorus Of Disapproval And Gerry McCann’s Phone Calls
The Madeleine McCann Location Device And Finding Brand And Ross
Madeleine McCann, Peter Mandelson And Russell Brand
Posted: 1st, November 2008 | In: Celebrities Comments (23) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





November 5th, 2008 at 9:12 am
Baltica
Arrested?
Over a kiss and tell sex scandal?
Where do you live - Dubai?
November 4th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
If Georgina Baillie had done anything wrong, the police would have arrested her. I would not want highly paid stars of radio leaving such messages on my answer phone. The problem is that they earned too much. With just a fraction of the money they could bring back Lee & Herring.
November 4th, 2008 at 1:27 pm
June
I think Sachs didn’t answer because there was a mix up with his phones.. or he forgot… he certainly hadn’t withdrawn from the programme and was ready to do another interview (that was meant to contain a plug for a documentary he was in).
And if you listen to the phone calls then you’ll hear Ross teasing Russell about his relationship with a granddaughter (although it’s not clear how truthful it is - even the press weren’t sure until Georgina confirmed it), Russell being mock-embarrassed and then when they can’t get through to Sachs them making an escalating joke out of how awful the messages they’ve left on the answer-phone are - which obviously inspired the Daily Mail hacks to phone Sachs and try and push him into denouncing Brand and Ross & even prosecuting them… which didn’t work… but after pushing for about a week they did manage to get public outrage going…
November 4th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Not Jeremy Vine then?
November 4th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
At the core of this whole thing is IMO, the fact that many have confused Andrew Sachs with Manuel.
They seem to think that BrOss attacked the already beaten and battered Manuel, adding more insult to injury.
NO. Manuel wasn’t real.
But it’ll all fade away.
Nine day wonder and all that.
Ross will go back to the Beeb and continue to earn a fortune (palpitations are already happening after the checking of Friday night, Saturday morning viewing/listening figures). Brand will continue to shock on commercial channels and make films in the US.
Life goes on and meanwhile, holding the fort for them in style is Jeremy Clarkson!! Bless.
November 4th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Karen
I thought comedians were meant to do comedy, not sex scandals.
But AS wasn’t on the show, had he been he could have refused to answer, and maybe thats why he wasn’t on the show - he didn’t find it funny? just smutty?
November 4th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
Lone
That’s nothing - pictures from a porn film she made are going round the internet…
They might turn up on Channel 5…
November 4th, 2008 at 11:59 am
From what I heard - from a friend who works in the Comedy Unit & who heard this from someone else etc etc … - Sachs wanted to redo the interview because he missed it but the producers felt it was funnier without him (or didn’t have time - in another version)… and that’s what he was muttering about when the hacks pounced on him and turned it to a sex scandal…
November 4th, 2008 at 11:56 am
Is that the tip of a winkie between her fingers ?
November 4th, 2008 at 11:48 am
M & A
She gave an interview about about her sex life - and she claims the details are real… and they involve her Granddad - the one that’s so upset about hearing Brand joke about sleeping with her… If I was outraged about my Grandpa being exposed to filth in front of the nation - I don’t think I’d expose him to more of it…
And it’s true that Sachs was meant to be on the show - so he didn’t mind talking to a comedian that’s famous for sleeping around and making ball bag jokes… what if they’d said the same kind of stuff while Sachs was on the phone or in the studio? The Daily Mail would’ve been hard pressed to make it a scandal… but now they’ve managed to cause this massive over-reaction every other comedian is going to be scrutinised & censored.
November 3rd, 2008 at 4:54 am
David. I think that Brandy’s offer to marry Georgina was sufficient enough as an apology.
Rossy told Brandy to apologise and drop it - throughout Brand’s constant twitterings. When Brandy is on one - it’s spontaneous and he can’t help it.
They are both grown men on a grown-up show behaving like naughty boys and talking about a naughty girl. What is wrong with that?
If Georgina had thought about her Grandad before she took to having sex with Brand - a notorious sex addict who regularly talks about his sexploits - then none of this would have happened for us to talk about.
I would have thought that any Grandpa who accepted his grand-child calling her pop-group such an emotive name would be expecting her to get royally rogered by cads like Brandy!
And if she was out to shock - then she has certainly caused shock.
Sachs should have used this publicity to revive his ex-career and got off his arse and took the piss out of the whole situation and made a butty whilst looking trendy!
Tom Baker is a prime example of older people taking the piss out of themselves and the beautiful women like Honor Blackman or Sylvia Sims in Absolutely Fabulous are marvellous!
Manuel was my most disliked character in Fawlty Towers - because I felt that he tried to upstage Cleese and Boothe regularly!
And that is precisely what he is doing now with Brandy and Rossy.
The Duke of Edinburgh would not have dignified this with a response - so why does Sachs?
Publicity and money!
November 3rd, 2008 at 4:42 am
Actually David she was outraged to find out that Russell was not ‘decent’
For someone who does topless modelling, lesbian soft core porn videos and stage shows, sells kiss and tell stories, and got with a guy who has a reputation for being ..well…indecent.
THEN complains also that her ‘good reputation’ had been ruined for life. That her life had been ruined..
She brought it on herself for getting with an idiot. Not to mention this would not ruin her life. Quite the opposite. Because WHAT? reputation??
No one even knew who she was until a couple of days ago.
GEORGINA BALLIE FAILS AT LIFE.
November 3rd, 2008 at 3:02 am
Karen, I think she made a big mistake selling her story. I think it was a very ill-judged move. But I don’t feel I have enough insight to know what was going through her mind when she did that to say that she is a hypocrite.
November 2nd, 2008 at 11:39 pm
David
Sachs was meant to answer the phone call and do an interview with Brand & if his agent is any good he should have been aware that Brand is famous for his sexually explicit comedy.
And isn’t it embarrassing for her granddad to find out that Brand did Manuel impressions when he and Georgina were sleeping together? I’d say that made her a hypocrite….
M and A
Karen
how does it make her a hypocrite? did she do the impressions or did he, or is ok for him to ‘kiss and tell’ but not her?
you seem to be blaming the wrong people, neither of them are Brands parents - he is meant to be a responsible adult
November 2nd, 2008 at 10:46 pm
Well, that’s as may be, Karen. I was thinking specifically of the first comment from coco that Jonathan Ross was not on on Friday night “thanks to this cheeky mare and her uncle” (grandfather, I assume they mean), which replicates many posts on various forums were the poster appears to believe that Georgina played some active role in bringing the twosome down.
I would defend her somewhat on the charge of hypocrisy though. I don’t think she’s actually claimed to be the sweet and virginal miss that some people seem to be angry to find she isn’t. Certainly she’s been publicly angry over the “joke” but then perhaps she doesn’t equate her activities, which appear to involve only consenting adults, with a fairly offensive prank played on her grandfather, who never invited the phone call and had his wishes that it not be broadcast disregarded? (and I would agree with her)
November 2nd, 2008 at 6:00 am
David
I think it’s more the fact that she’s a hypocrite that’s the problem… she’s pretty sanctimonious for someone in a group called ‘Satanic Sluts Extreme’…
November 2nd, 2008 at 1:24 am
Why are people blaming Georgina Baillie for what happened to Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross? She didn’t make the prank phone calls; they did. She didn’t make sure the whole country knew about it; the Daily Mail did that. She didn’t make 30,000 complaints; the public did. She did call for them to be sacked, but does anyone seriously think the BBC paid attention to that rather than the thousands of complaints.
So if you’re upset about it, blame Russell and Jonathan themselves, blame the Daily Mail, blame the public, blame the BBC. But don’t blame Georgina. She may have exploited the situation, but she didn’t cause their downfall.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Georgina Baillie is in it for as much cash as she can get
She should give the money she has made in the last week to charity then disappear. Most people in this country are not interested in you and your sordid life style.
November 1st, 2008 at 2:47 pm
coco
aren’t victims naughty! after at 47 we can’t expect JR to control himself , can we?
November 1st, 2008 at 12:34 pm
No means no Sam
November 1st, 2008 at 11:43 am
yehbut nobut yehbut
November 1st, 2008 at 11:24 am
Indeed - her uncle is blameless. And instead of Ross viewers get more bilge…
November 1st, 2008 at 10:41 am
I cannot believe what some people will do for publicity.
I really needed Jonny Ross last night - and he was not there to cheer me up - thanks to this cheeky mare and her uncle!