<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Reporting Going Cheap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396397</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396397</guid>
		<description>Thatpoorpriest! Just goes to prove and demonstrate the tremendous pressure that the PJ were under to have dared arrest the 'grieving and badly done to parents'!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thatpoorpriest! Just goes to prove and demonstrate the tremendous pressure that the PJ were under to have dared arrest the &#8216;grieving and badly done to parents&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396396</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396396</guid>
		<description>Matt. The CuckooClam knows nothing about this case and the Arseutin crein only quotes out of context and without looking into the syntax of the translations.

Methinks we wastee our breath as we gasp at their ineptitude in assimilating facts!

New thread!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt. The CuckooClam knows nothing about this case and the Arseutin crein only quotes out of context and without looking into the syntax of the translations.</p>
<p>Methinks we wastee our breath as we gasp at their ineptitude in assimilating facts!</p>
<p>New thread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396391</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396391</guid>
		<description>Raspy Arseputin says!     ''You will be happy to know that it is doubtful if I shall post on this subject again, it has steadily become an anvil for people to forge all sorts of ridiculous and pointless theories on, without a shred of evidence rather like the washed curtains myth and the blue bag myth, none of which manage a mention in the files, and despite official statements, which are ignored if they do not fit the theory of the day.''
...........................................................................................................

What absolutely marvellous news. This should make the thread easier to read.

No Arseputin! Yeah!

I wonder which other name he will use to reveal himself to us? Bob? Dave? Jack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raspy Arseputin says!     &#8221;You will be happy to know that it is doubtful if I shall post on this subject again, it has steadily become an anvil for people to forge all sorts of ridiculous and pointless theories on, without a shred of evidence rather like the washed curtains myth and the blue bag myth, none of which manage a mention in the files, and despite official statements, which are ignored if they do not fit the theory of the day.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>What absolutely marvellous news. This should make the thread easier to read.</p>
<p>No Arseputin! Yeah!</p>
<p>I wonder which other name he will use to reveal himself to us? Bob? Dave? Jack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt.</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396390</guid>
		<description>coolandcalm Says: 
November 8th, 2008 at 8:56 am 

Are you suggesting that it was not  Mark Harrison, the Specialist National Search Advisor, who joined the Investigation, who advised, in his report to the PJ, that "specialized dogs should be used, specifically an EVRD with advanced training 
to detect dead victims' cadaver scent and a CSI  dog, able to detect human blood" ???

Are you suggesting that he did not advise the PJ re  "“new and deeper searches to Murat's home; and forensic searches to Murat and his friends' cars and to the McCann couple car, with the EVRD and CSI dogs"  ???

 :)

Are you quite sure that the Dogs  "arrived at the apartment on July 31st" ?

Could you please direct me to the source which suggests that the McCann's 
requested the EVRD and CSI Dogs ?

Is it an Official Source, ie...the Official Files, or is it a Newspaper Source ??
I know how hot you are to discount Newspaper Sources usually.

 Many thanks in anticipation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coolandcalm Says:<br />
November 8th, 2008 at 8:56 am </p>
<p>Are you suggesting that it was not  Mark Harrison, the Specialist National Search Advisor, who joined the Investigation, who advised, in his report to the PJ, that &#8220;specialized dogs should be used, specifically an EVRD with advanced training<br />
to detect dead victims&#8217; cadaver scent and a CSI  dog, able to detect human blood&#8221; ???</p>
<p>Are you suggesting that he did not advise the PJ re  &#8220;“new and deeper searches to Murat&#8217;s home; and forensic searches to Murat and his friends&#8217; cars and to the McCann couple car, with the EVRD and CSI dogs&#8221;  ???</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Are you quite sure that the Dogs  &#8220;arrived at the apartment on July 31st&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Could you please direct me to the source which suggests that the McCann&#8217;s<br />
requested the EVRD and CSI Dogs ?</p>
<p>Is it an Official Source, ie&#8230;the Official Files, or is it a Newspaper Source ??<br />
I know how hot you are to discount Newspaper Sources usually.</p>
<p> Many thanks in anticipation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatpoorpriest</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396389</link>
		<dc:creator>thatpoorpriest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 09:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396389</guid>
		<description>they left a day after their last arguido interview, which incorporated the results of the dog work and involved over 40 unanswered questions. In their defence, the PJ knew they were leaving and didn't stop them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they left a day after their last arguido interview, which incorporated the results of the dog work and involved over 40 unanswered questions. In their defence, the PJ knew they were leaving and didn&#8217;t stop them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolandcalm</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396387</link>
		<dc:creator>coolandcalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396387</guid>
		<description>The dogs arrived (at the McCanns request) at the apartment on July 31st.  The McCanns left Portugal on Sept 9th.  hardly running for it...........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogs arrived (at the McCanns request) at the apartment on July 31st.  The McCanns left Portugal on Sept 9th.  hardly running for it&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396385</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396385</guid>
		<description>The fact also remains that as soon as the dogs had done their work the McCs ran for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact also remains that as soon as the dogs had done their work the McCs ran for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clouseau</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396383</link>
		<dc:creator>clouseau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396383</guid>
		<description>Raspy
many tx for the reply...now that was not difficult was it


why do you think the PJ asked Mrs K question 41?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raspy<br />
many tx for the reply&#8230;now that was not difficult was it</p>
<p>why do you think the PJ asked Mrs K question 41?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396382</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 07:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396382</guid>
		<description>If you had the ability to read you would see that I put "in short" &lt;b&gt;The act or process of stating a precise meaning or significance; formulation of a meaning.&lt;/b&gt;before "my" summation of the handlers report.

The propensity of the less cerebral posters to twist, alter and misrepresent without a thought or a hint of shame official statements, says more about these people than it does about the McCanns or the case.

The guilty in this case WHO EVER they are will surely be apprehended by factual evidence, not the inventions of some hate filled group intent on administering their own kangaroo court justice.

Madeleine McCanns parents, who have lost a child through their own stupidity are in a place no right minded person would ever like to be, what they are suffering I would not even try to imagine, for that suffering to be compounded by the attacks and baseless innuendo of amateur detectives is nothing short of barbarity. Fair comment is one thing, enjoying and adding to the grief of the parents is the act of compassion-less people, and in all this pursuit of the parents, Madeleine McCann has become the means to the lynch mobs cause, and nothing to do with justice for this little girl whither she is alive or otherwise.
You will be happy to know that it is doubtful if I shall post on this subject again, it has steadily become an anvil for people to forge all sorts of ridiculous and pointless theories on, without a shred of evidence rather like the washed curtains myth and the blue bag myth, none of which manage a mention in the files, and despite official statements, which are ignored if they do not fit the theory of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you had the ability to read you would see that I put &#8220;in short&#8221; <b>The act or process of stating a precise meaning or significance; formulation of a meaning.</b>before &#8220;my&#8221; summation of the handlers report.</p>
<p>The propensity of the less cerebral posters to twist, alter and misrepresent without a thought or a hint of shame official statements, says more about these people than it does about the McCanns or the case.</p>
<p>The guilty in this case WHO EVER they are will surely be apprehended by factual evidence, not the inventions of some hate filled group intent on administering their own kangaroo court justice.</p>
<p>Madeleine McCanns parents, who have lost a child through their own stupidity are in a place no right minded person would ever like to be, what they are suffering I would not even try to imagine, for that suffering to be compounded by the attacks and baseless innuendo of amateur detectives is nothing short of barbarity. Fair comment is one thing, enjoying and adding to the grief of the parents is the act of compassion-less people, and in all this pursuit of the parents, Madeleine McCann has become the means to the lynch mobs cause, and nothing to do with justice for this little girl whither she is alive or otherwise.<br />
You will be happy to know that it is doubtful if I shall post on this subject again, it has steadily become an anvil for people to forge all sorts of ridiculous and pointless theories on, without a shred of evidence rather like the washed curtains myth and the blue bag myth, none of which manage a mention in the files, and despite official statements, which are ignored if they do not fit the theory of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveT</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396379</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 04:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396379</guid>
		<description>Rasputin,

There has been a cover/clean up. The dogs have confirmed what a lot of people thought, but as yet there is not enough evidence/willingness to proceed. 

Meanwhile, the McCann's have failed to request the Portuguese to carry on with the search or push for the British authorities to investigate. Now that the case has been "parked", the Mccann's have been remarkably quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rasputin,</p>
<p>There has been a cover/clean up. The dogs have confirmed what a lot of people thought, but as yet there is not enough evidence/willingness to proceed. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, the McCann&#8217;s have failed to request the Portuguese to carry on with the search or push for the British authorities to investigate. Now that the case has been &#8220;parked&#8221;, the Mccann&#8217;s have been remarkably quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396373</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396373</guid>
		<description>rasputin, i have replied to you but its stuck in mods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rasputin, i have replied to you but its stuck in mods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396372</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396372</guid>
		<description>apparently my last comment is awaiting modertaion mods ?please free it thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently my last comment is awaiting modertaion mods ?please free it thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396371</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396371</guid>
		<description>i'm not squirming at all rasputin, don't talk rot, i'm sitting here having a nice glass of wine, would you like a drop ? i doubt a blind man could see anything really, but whatever, you have now done what you accused me of, rewriting to make something mean what it doesn't. it doesn't say the dogs evidence is useless it says

' in any event no evidential or intelligence
 reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with
 corroborating evidence.'

and i've told you twice now how that corroborating evidence could've been destroyed. and  evidence or spores were found, not only by the dogs, see here for instance:
http://tinyurl.comhttp://tinyurl.com/5tukye/5tukye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not squirming at all rasputin, don&#8217;t talk rot, i&#8217;m sitting here having a nice glass of wine, would you like a drop ? i doubt a blind man could see anything really, but whatever, you have now done what you accused me of, rewriting to make something mean what it doesn&#8217;t. it doesn&#8217;t say the dogs evidence is useless it says</p>
<p>&#8216; in any event no evidential or intelligence<br />
 reliability can be made from these alerts unless they can be confirmed with<br />
 corroborating evidence.&#8217;</p>
<p>and i&#8217;ve told you twice now how that corroborating evidence could&#8217;ve been destroyed. and  evidence or spores were found, not only by the dogs, see here for instance:<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.comhttp://tinyurl.com/5tukye/5tukye" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.comhttp://tinyurl.com/5tukye/5tukye</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396368</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396368</guid>
		<description>Squirming rather a lot, your take is arrant nonsense, a blind man could see exactly what the dog handler said, in short, &lt;b&gt;without corroboration the dogs alerts are useless as evidence or an indication to evidence.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squirming rather a lot, your take is arrant nonsense, a blind man could see exactly what the dog handler said, in short, <b>without corroboration the dogs alerts are useless as evidence or an indication to evidence.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-9#comment-396367</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396367</guid>
		<description>rasputin, they are dogs trained to scent such, they scented such and hence their findings are suggestive that they scented such, there is no misrepresentation or or a long shot as you claim, the only long shot i grant you is making the 'suggestion' into a postive statement, okay i grant you that, but it's not a long way it's more a interpreting of what;

'My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD’s alert indications is that it is
 suggestive that this is ‘cadaver scent’ contaminant ;

means. it means the dogs behaved in a manner which suggests to that individual cadaverine scent was present on the belongs of the mccanns.

and i stated or elaborated that the corrobative measures needed to verify the source of  the scent ( such as dna sampling) could have been corrupted by the simple method of washing the affected areas with household detergents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rasputin, they are dogs trained to scent such, they scented such and hence their findings are suggestive that they scented such, there is no misrepresentation or or a long shot as you claim, the only long shot i grant you is making the &#8217;suggestion&#8217; into a postive statement, okay i grant you that, but it&#8217;s not a long way it&#8217;s more a interpreting of what;</p>
<p>&#8216;My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD’s alert indications is that it is<br />
 suggestive that this is ‘cadaver scent’ contaminant ;</p>
<p>means. it means the dogs behaved in a manner which suggests to that individual cadaverine scent was present on the belongs of the mccanns.</p>
<p>and i stated or elaborated that the corrobative measures needed to verify the source of  the scent ( such as dna sampling) could have been corrupted by the simple method of washing the affected areas with household detergents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-8#comment-396366</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396366</guid>
		<description>Again you misrepresent even the esteemed dog handlers opinion, which is,
&lt;b&gt;suggestive that this is ‘cadaver scent’ contaminant.&lt;/b&gt;

Suggestive is a long way from what you claim,  "they state that cadaverine scent was detected by the dogs"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again you misrepresent even the esteemed dog handlers opinion, which is,<br />
<b>suggestive that this is ‘cadaver scent’ contaminant.</b></p>
<p>Suggestive is a long way from what you claim,  &#8220;they state that cadaverine scent was detected by the dogs&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-8#comment-396365</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396365</guid>
		<description>apparently its also in persil:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_percarbonate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently its also in persil:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_percarbonate" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_percarbonate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-8#comment-396364</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396364</guid>
		<description>rasputin, what is interesting though is that they are an officail body and they state that cadaverine scent was detected by the dogs. the problem was a lack of corroberation by the forensics, the samples found were too corrupted to be of any use. interestingly earlier today i read this on the register, vanish works:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/05/detergent_for_murders/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rasputin, what is interesting though is that they are an officail body and they state that cadaverine scent was detected by the dogs. the problem was a lack of corroberation by the forensics, the samples found were too corrupted to be of any use. interestingly earlier today i read this on the register, vanish works:<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/05/detergent_for_murders/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/05/detergent_for_murders/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-8#comment-396363</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396363</guid>
		<description>F.B.I. Forensic Canine Program Specialist Advisor. 
27 Church Road 
Radley 
Oxford 
0x14 3AT 

Direct dial: +447960267357 
+441235526763 
Email: 1 k9mn@btinternet.com 

August 2007 

OPERATION TASK CANINE SEARCH REPORT 



The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating 
Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and 
locate human remains or Human blood. 

The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog 
alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as 
evidence. 

Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only 
alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog 
indicated by forensic laboratory analysis. 

My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD's alert indications is that it is 
suggestive that this is 'cadaver scent' contaminant. This does not however 
suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a 
number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence 
reliability can be made from these alerts&lt;b&gt; unless they can be confirmed with 
corroborating evidence.&lt;/b&gt;
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 
Abbreviated so clueless does not get to confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F.B.I. Forensic Canine Program Specialist Advisor.<br />
27 Church Road<br />
Radley<br />
Oxford<br />
0&#215;14 3AT </p>
<p>Direct dial: +447960267357<br />
+441235526763<br />
Email: 1 <a href="mailto:k9mn@btinternet.com">k9mn@btinternet.com</a> </p>
<p>August 2007 </p>
<p>OPERATION TASK CANINE SEARCH REPORT </p>
<p>The tasking for this operation was as per my normal Standard Operating<br />
Procedures. The dogs are deployed as search assets to secure evidence and<br />
locate human remains or Human blood. </p>
<p>The dogs only alerted to property associated with the McCann family. The dog<br />
alert indications MUST be corroborated if to establish their findings as<br />
evidence. </p>
<p>Therefore in this particular case, as no human remains were located, the only<br />
alert indications that may become corroborated are those that the CSI dog<br />
indicated by forensic laboratory analysis. </p>
<p>My professional opinion as regards to the EVRD&#8217;s alert indications is that it is<br />
suggestive that this is &#8216;cadaver scent&#8217; contaminant. This does not however<br />
suggest a motive or suspect as cross contamination could be as a result of a<br />
number of given scenarios and in any event no evidential or intelligence<br />
reliability can be made from these alerts<b> unless they can be confirmed with<br />
corroborating evidence.</b><br />
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
Abbreviated so clueless does not get to confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rasputin</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194264/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-reporting-going-cheap.html/comment-page-8#comment-396361</link>
		<dc:creator>Rasputin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194264#comment-396361</guid>
		<description>Never believe everything you read.
http://tinyurl.com/6xqyjf
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For the personal benefit of clueless, as I told you the other night rumours abound about the questions or rather the answers to the questions contained in the rogatory letters, for one simple reason, &lt;b&gt;they have not been made public.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never believe everything you read.<br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6xqyjf" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6xqyjf</a><br />
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<br />
For the personal benefit of clueless, as I told you the other night rumours abound about the questions or rather the answers to the questions contained in the rogatory letters, for one simple reason, <b>they have not been made public.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
