<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hazel Blears Explains Political Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: coolandcalm</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396276</link>
		<dc:creator>coolandcalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396276</guid>
		<description>why are they so many strident female labour politicos who 'know best'? 
 
Blears sends me crackers every time I see her bouncing around on TV  but she comes second on the irritation scale to Dawn Nanny Primarilo.  (don't know how to spell it and really can't be arsed to check!)  The nanny voice, the nanny 'I'm disappointed in you' expression;   aaarrrggghhh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why are they so many strident female labour politicos who &#8216;know best&#8217;? </p>
<p>Blears sends me crackers every time I see her bouncing around on TV  but she comes second on the irritation scale to Dawn Nanny Primarilo.  (don&#8217;t know how to spell it and really can&#8217;t be arsed to check!)  The nanny voice, the nanny &#8216;I&#8217;m disappointed in you&#8217; expression;   aaarrrggghhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396187</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396187</guid>
		<description>Chenier
I still wonder though, if Obama knows about Bob The Builder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chenier<br />
I still wonder though, if Obama knows about Bob The Builder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coco</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396186</link>
		<dc:creator>coco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396186</guid>
		<description>Hazel Schnazel - Knightess of The New Order of the Neo-Bollocks Party says:

“Political blogs are written by people with disdain for the political system and politicians, who see their function as unearthing scandals, conspiracies and perceived hypocrisy.”
.........................................................................................................

So what is this Weirdy One really saying? That we shouldn't be unearthing scandals, conspiracies or any perceived hypocrisy?

So - it's OK for the NOTW and Panorama to do all of the above - but not the fucking Bloggers and Posters of the realm?

Thanks Commandant Hazel Schnazel! Thanks a fucking lot! 

Because this means that when programme-makers and newspaper editors are banned from airing their investigations - and Bloggers and Posters are banned from airing theirs - people like John Prescott and other Government busy-bodies can carry on living it up at the tax-payers expense!

Where's Mandy and Big Blair and Baby Blair hanging out at the moment? 

Very low profiles all around! Bastards. Drag 'em out and get'em in the ring!

Poor Menezes! Poor Aluminium traders! Poor contractors! Poor MM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazel Schnazel - Knightess of The New Order of the Neo-Bollocks Party says:</p>
<p>“Political blogs are written by people with disdain for the political system and politicians, who see their function as unearthing scandals, conspiracies and perceived hypocrisy.”<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So what is this Weirdy One really saying? That we shouldn&#8217;t be unearthing scandals, conspiracies or any perceived hypocrisy?</p>
<p>So - it&#8217;s OK for the NOTW and Panorama to do all of the above - but not the fucking Bloggers and Posters of the realm?</p>
<p>Thanks Commandant Hazel Schnazel! Thanks a fucking lot! </p>
<p>Because this means that when programme-makers and newspaper editors are banned from airing their investigations - and Bloggers and Posters are banned from airing theirs - people like John Prescott and other Government busy-bodies can carry on living it up at the tax-payers expense!</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s Mandy and Big Blair and Baby Blair hanging out at the moment? </p>
<p>Very low profiles all around! Bastards. Drag &#8216;em out and get&#8217;em in the ring!</p>
<p>Poor Menezes! Poor Aluminium traders! Poor contractors! Poor MM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396184</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396184</guid>
		<description>Chenier
Much as I dislike the wee poof these days, I cannot compare is ascension to St Margaret's

There are many who wish to sing' Ding Dong the Witch is Dead'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chenier<br />
Much as I dislike the wee poof these days, I cannot compare is ascension to St Margaret&#8217;s</p>
<p>There are many who wish to sing&#8217; Ding Dong the Witch is Dead&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396183</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396183</guid>
		<description>Ah but in Parliament, she sits

and if not, Woohhhhhhh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah but in Parliament, she sits</p>
<p>and if not, Woohhhhhhh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396181</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396181</guid>
		<description>Come on, Sponge Bob; New Labour was Maggie Thatcher without the sex appeal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Sponge Bob; New Labour was Maggie Thatcher without the sex appeal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396177</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396177</guid>
		<description>The woman has a voice made for dog whistle politics</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woman has a voice made for dog whistle politics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396175</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396175</guid>
		<description>Clearly, she doesn't think that there are many supporters reading the internet. 

...and that the Labour movement has always been based on the 'poor people' indulging in debate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, she doesn&#8217;t think that there are many supporters reading the internet. </p>
<p>&#8230;and that the Labour movement has always been based on the &#8216;poor people&#8217; indulging in debate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396165</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396165</guid>
		<description>It's the bit about the culture of cynicism and despair that gets me; doesn't she know that we can?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the bit about the culture of cynicism and despair that gets me; doesn&#8217;t she know that we can?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396163</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396163</guid>
		<description>Fanaticalstatic stuff

How does one of the New Girls of the New Labour develop so much disdain for free speech?  Or is it just non controlled media?

I may well be the one closing the door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fanaticalstatic stuff</p>
<p>How does one of the New Girls of the New Labour develop so much disdain for free speech?  Or is it just non controlled media?</p>
<p>I may well be the one closing the door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpongeBob</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396162</link>
		<dc:creator>SpongeBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396162</guid>
		<description>Hey Bleary, I might even have liked you...You will never know now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bleary, I might even have liked you&#8230;You will never know now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396158</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396158</guid>
		<description>Perhaps we could have a whip-round and send her a postcard explaining that some guy called Obama managed to get over half the personal votes, and a massive majority in the electoral college, in the US Presidential Election with the assistance of an unprecedented understanding of the way the Web works.

Or is that too complicated for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we could have a whip-round and send her a postcard explaining that some guy called Obama managed to get over half the personal votes, and a massive majority in the electoral college, in the US Presidential Election with the assistance of an unprecedented understanding of the way the Web works.</p>
<p>Or is that too complicated for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorak</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396157</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396157</guid>
		<description>Blear is so out of touch she can't even see over the bar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blear is so out of touch she can&#8217;t even see over the bar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: June</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/194310/politicians/hazel-blears-explains-political-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-396154</link>
		<dc:creator>June</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 20:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=194310#comment-396154</guid>
		<description>of course we believe politicians, ever tried a salted one? yummy oh bugger was thinking of almonds...now back to politicians....are they deluded or just out and out fibbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course we believe politicians, ever tried a salted one? yummy oh bugger was thinking of almonds&#8230;now back to politicians&#8230;.are they deluded or just out and out fibbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
