Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Shannon Matthews And Amber Alerts

By: pepper

pepper — Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:07:23 +0000

i, lost ,,,,,,,
i am lost lol

By: clouseau

clouseau — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:36:55 +0000

Raspy
did you get my fax?

By: clouseau

clouseau — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:35:10 +0000

so Webster never saw Maddie on the last day…no suprise there then

By: clouseau

clouseau — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:32:55 +0000

evening all stand by your beds..in your case Raspy cot

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:06:21 +0000

I knew it was too difficult for you. I shall scroll.

By: Rasputin

Rasputin — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:43:12 +0000

Typical traffic warden speak, you and your ilk are the ones doing the accusing, put up or shut up. The parents are not suspects and Madeleine is a ward of court, perhaps you have now done an about turn and are not accusing the parents of anything or any involvement. Make up your mind.

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:09:11 +0000

Rasputin
Nearly right. But it is the McCs who are accusing someone of having adbucted their child. They are presenting themselves as the aggrieved, and the prosecution case would revolve round them as the victims. (Or secondary victims if we still bother about Madeleine.)
“That you did unlawfully take MM from the custody of her parents without their consent … ”
So in that scenario they are the chief prosecution witnesses. The prosecution is prepared by Police and prosecution authorities ON THEIR BEHALF.
They therefore carry the burden of proof.

By: Rasputin

Rasputin — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:33:30 +0000

Madelein Beth McCann is a Ward of Court, for one good reason, can you guess what it is, can you guess what sort of status nullifies Ward of Court status.

By: Rasputin

Rasputin — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:38:22 +0000

Quite correct PM, “3 The burden is logically therefore on to those who claim there WAS an abduction to PROVE it. That is the burden of proof on the prosecution” ++++++++++++++++++Your words not mine, PM.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
As you and your fellow accusers here are to all intent and purposes the prosecution, how about you set about proving your innuendos and slurs.
Incidentally there is no negative, the parents are not suspects, that is a given positive.
Must be off, duty calls.

By: Saul

Saul — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:05:51 +0000

I’ll leave rational for the rationalista. Don’t trust Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank. They speak with forked tongues.

By: chenier

chenier — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:55:37 +0000

Pretty good, thanks Saul.

Have been away so not up to insightful genius, just .scratching the surface.

My theory is I may say something rational after 12 hours of sleep, though that may be wishful thinknig..

But I’m glad that you’re around; you’ll have to do the rational stuff; so goodnight, Saul. I leave it in your competent hands….

By: Saul

Saul — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:40:56 +0000

C——–r, how are you doing?

By: chenier

chenier — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:28:48 +0000

Saul

That looks like a very good analysis of what happened to Baby P…

By: chenier

chenier — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 02:26:58 +0000

Poor Priest,

I think the admin are working hard to get this resolved; the aim is to improve communication at all levels both in content and the way in which people’s contributions look, but websites are a lot trickier than it may seem. Hence beta testing, that wonderful process that brought us vista…

By: thatpoorpriest

thatpoorpriest — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:44:19 +0000

100% agree with all you say petermac, inluding the spacing issue!

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:18:38 +0000

1 Mods, Admin, Anorak, and anyone else who is listening - Please put this and other postings in single line spacing - URGENT REFORM NEEDED
2 You CANNOT prove a negative. So… You cannot PROVE there was NOT an abduction, other than by positive evidence that something else happened.
3 The burden is logically therefore on to those who claim there WAS an abduction to PROVE it. That is the burden of proof on the prosecution.
KM said all those months ago that she had such evidence. Is it in her statement to the PJ ? Or was it the ‘jemmied window’ and ‘Cuddle Cat on the high shelf’. Can she bring herself to release that evidence now, even if she withheld it from the PJ for all those months. Come on KM. Tell the world, NOW, why you KNOW Maaaaadel’n was abducted, or forgive us if we continue to doubt you and your veracity, and that of GM, and of the rest of the Tapas 7/9
And so on
And on
And on
And the probable death of a little girl has quietly been expunged from the record.

By: Saul

Saul — Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:17:59 +0000

Flogging a dead horse

Buy a stronger whip.
Change riders.
Say things like, “This is the way we have always ridden this horse.”
Appoint a committee to study the horse.
Arrange to visit other sites to see how they ride dead horses.
Increase the standards to ride dead horses.
Appoint a tiger team to revive the dead horse.
Create a training session to increase our riding ability.
Compare the state of dead horses in todays environment.
Change the requirements declaring that “This horse is not dead.”
Hire contractors to ride the dead horse.
Harness several dead horses together for increased speed.
Declare that “No horse is too dead to beat.”
Provide additional funding to increase the horse’s performance.
Do a Cost Analysis study to see if contractors can ride it cheaper.
Purchase a product to make dead horses run faster.
Declare the horse is “better, faster and cheaper” dead.
Form a quality circle to find uses for dead horses.
Revisit the performance requirements for horses.
Say this horse was procured with cost as an independent variable.
Promote the dead horse to a supervisory position.

By: Montaillou

Montaillou — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:34:55 +0000

Goodnight Chatelaine if you are still around, sorry I’m late tonight, still working on and off in front of TV, not the best way to work but it is late.

By: Montaillou

Montaillou — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:33:27 +0000

Ooh Raspy wherefore art thou? Question Time is coming to a place near you next week. Perhaps you could take the opportunity to put forward your interesting and innovative theories on the MM case. Ssee how they go down with the great Scottish general public - either snooze or boos I guess. It will be a wow, if you’re going I think I’ll go too to ch-j-eeer.

By: Garth

Garth — Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:19:29 +0000

thatpoorpriest Says:
November 13th, 2008 at 10:52 pm

if you don’t know already, it must be that you are just not ready to accept it, but you will soon enough.
—————–

Firkin hell what bleedin planet is he/she on?

Is this the type of posters you refer Chatters?