Baby P: Socialist Liberal Conservatives To Blame And Sterilising The Guilty
Or as a Haringey council spokesman puts it:
“This morning the Labour group were further updated on the tragic case of Baby P. The purpose of the meeting was solely to ensure councillors were fully informed on all aspects of the case and the review commissioned by central government.”
But what about Baby P?
…furious Children’s Secretary Ed Balls warned he would come down hard on any department whose blunders failed to prevent the death of the tot with the angelic face.
Yes, the blonde child. But what of non-blonde social workers?
‘MY ABUSE QUIZ HELL’
Sacked whistleblower Nevres Kemal last night claimed council officials were so furious with her they launched an abuse probe into her own daughter’s welfare.
Again: if you are wrongly accused the social workers are the devils. But if they leave you alone and the abuse is real the social workers are the devils. Anyone want the job when the Sun gets a load of social workers sacked?
Here’s a headline from the Daily Mail:
“Social workers took our children away … because of an incorrect hospital diagnosis”.
DAILY MAIL (front page): “BABY P: RULING THAT COST HIS LIFE”
A foster family was ready to receive Baby P, but it was not to be…
“The fair-haired, blue-eyed toddler …” What to do?
MAKE pre-nuptial deals law and boost marriage, says Conservative think-tank
Yes, marriage is the answer. Happyy, happyyyyy, happyyyy marriage…
Mr Duncan Smith said the report was ‘timely’ because of public concern over the case of Baby P, the 17-month-old toddler left to die in a bloodstained cot after suffering unimaginable brutality at the hands of his mother and her live-in boyfriend.
Because married people don’t harm children, right IDS?
He said the case ’shone the spotlight on the chaotic nature of family life’ in the poorest parts of Britain and proved the urgent need to shore up traditional relationships.
Shore them up by making it harder to separate? Make it harder for one partner to leave an abusive relationship? It’s a terrific plan…
Posted: 17th, November 2008 | In: Key Posts, Media Comments (9) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- June on The Pirelli 2010 Calendar In Artful Nudity (NSFW)
- June on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- Tony on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- Cheryl on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- cheekyappleblossom on I’m A Celebrity: Quitter Katie Price Wanted To Die With Jedward
November 17th, 2008 at 4:57 pm
Not to me they are not, and those bastards can be dealt with I hope by fellow inmates far more successfully than anyone else can deal with them.
I never have blamed the police for car chases that end in death of the driver of the car they are chasing.
But get a load of this
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/3472664/Father-locked-up-in-cell-for-smacking-son.html
November 17th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
It doesn’t absolve all the others but in the furore to attribute blame to the professionals the three perpetrators of the ‘murder’ are almost being side-lined in responsibility.
The chain of responsibility is long but it starts with the mother. The mother who said the sound of his screams as he was tortured was so upsetting ing she went outside for a cigarette!
Same as with ‘joy-riding deaths’. Its popular now to blame the police for chasing them but maybe if they hadn’t gone off racing in stolen cars in the first place there wouldn’t be a death chase?
November 17th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
Peter Mac
Ok then , why are they there? how do they justify their jobs? If they don’t have to do anything?
If anyone is ill and goes to a doctor , the doctor usually acts in the patients interest, if he/she doesn’t they are disciplined
But its not their fault we fall ill or are injured
The police when chasing a fool/criminal/idiot who crashes and kills himself are doing their job, if they didn’t give chase then complaints to the Police Authority would be justified.
I think the people who committed the crimes against this child should be thrown to the wolves, but it doesn’t absolve others who could have prevented it
November 17th, 2008 at 4:01 pm
Yes PeterMac, I’m with you on this.
November 17th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
But to the story, it seems to me to be following the same mindset that refers every death or injury caused by a lunatic youth who crashes a stolen car whilst the police are trying to stop him, being referred to the Independent Police Complaints Authority.
Why?
These wretched people caused the baby’s death. I know the Social Services might have done more, but why should they actually have to do anything.
The woman had the child(ren). The responsibility is hers. If it is shown that Social Services did not help as much as they might have done, that is a matter of regret, but it does NOT make them responsible.
Just as it did not all those years ago make them responsible for the death of Victoria Climbie, trafficked across the world by her own mother and put in the hands of a wholly unsuitable ‘relative’.
And the mother had the gall to criticise, without anyone in the media taking her on face to face.
November 17th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Anorak
Now can we have single spacing, please.
November 17th, 2008 at 12:48 pm
It’s getting there…
November 17th, 2008 at 11:59 am
Oh wow. I have post numbers. I am shaking my tambourine as I post.
November 17th, 2008 at 11:58 am
While there has been a chain of bungles and much neglect by complacency from those who should have done much more, I hope we don’t forget the actual perpetrators of the crime.
The mother, the mother’s boyfriend and his brother. I hate to see their blame in all this being diluted by the assorted accusations against various professionals.