
How The Media Turned Shannon Matthews Into A Madeleine McCann
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann and Shannon Matthews.
Karen Matthews has been found guilty of kidnapping her child Shannon Matthews and perverting the course of justice. Karen Matthews is “PURE EVIL”. As Evil as Baby P’s killers?
Lest readers not understand that Karen Matthews is “PURE EVIL”, the papers remind them of the fact on their front pages:
THE SUN: “PURE EVIL – Family even tied to scam Maddie fund”
DAILY STAR: “PURE EVIL” – Shannon’s mum had sex and food orgies as kids starved”
DAILY MIRROR: “MOTHER OF PURE EVIL” – In the rush to damn, the Mirror seems to be calling Shannon Matthews “PURE EVIL”. And that’s harsh.
Family friend Petra Jamieson adds: “She’s the ideal daughter who behaves well. We want everyone to remember Shannon, like they do Madeleine McCann.”
Our Shannie
When Shannon Matthews became the newspaper’s pet cause, the Sun embraced the drama more than any other paper, posting a reward for her safe return and printing a poster with a picture of the missing child, a cash sum and its logo.
When a child suffers or goes missing the Sun’s marketing team set about building the brand. Shannon is “Our Shannon”. As for Shannon being the new Maddie, the Sun was only too happy to help that game along announcing: “McCanns: We pray for Shan.”
The Sun was not alone in this shrill game of Tabloid Bingo, screaming out the names of the missing. The tabloid Telegraph joined in.
Craig Meehan spoke of the McCanns’ celebrity:
Mr Meehan, 22, went on: “To me, they [the McCanns] are like celebrities in other people’s eyes. They’ve got money, they know celebrities and all that, so they can afford to do everything they do, everything they can.
“We’re trying to do what we can with the money we’ve got, with the resources we’ve got.“
The Times went all in.
Sarah Payne, smiling in her school uniform; Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, in their Manchester United shirts; Madeleine McCann, staring inquisitively with her distinctive bleeding iris . . .The names and faces of these girls who have disappeared are etched into the public’s collective memory.
Bingo!
The Mirror’s Sue Carroll told us:
Shannon is as precious to her family as Madeleine McCann, missing for 300 days, is to hers. But where are the front-page pictures, campaigns, the furore? Would this be different if she was the daughter of two middle-class, mediasavvy parents? Not a working-class child from up North.
He cohort Paul Routledge waded in:
It pays to be middle-class when your daughter vanishes.
Yeah, lucky them. But still the Mirror wore its yellow ribbon for Maddie, whatever her parents’ wealth a child was missing and it would not miss out of the contest to care the most.
Deborah Orr provided context:
There may have been no great rush to sanctify Karen Matthews, whose anguish over the loss of her daughter is not questioned. But there has been little attempt to accuse her either. People feel sorrow, but not as much surprise. The less comfortable an existence you have, the more likely it is that you will undergo awful life experiences. That isn’t class prejudice, but a sad fact of life in a remarkably unequal society.
Roy Greenslade was taken in:
But what distinguishes the Craig article is the way in which she paints a poignant portrait of Mrs Matthews’s obvious anguish. Three weeks on from the day her daughter failed to arrive home, it is one of the most sympathetic description of Shannon’s mother to appear in print.
Eyes down for Tabloid Bingo!
The columnists fodder. Tick.
T-shirts. Tick.
The candlelit vigil. Tick.
The balloons.Tick.
The child’s friend.
Megan Aldridge wants her friend Shannon back. “I sat on the bench at school today on my own at break time because I had no one to play with. I just want my friend back. She was the bestest friend in the world.” Mawkish sentiment. A child appealing for another missing child to be allowed to go by whoever has taken her. The Mirror jumping on bandwagon and showing how much it cares. Look at the child. Look at her pain.
All elements in the panoply of the tabloid cause. Our Maddie the benchmark for missing children.
The Media Duped
Shannon was found alive and in decent shape.
All eyes trained on “oddball” Michael Donovan, aka Paul Drake.
He of the kinky sex. He of the vile uniform sex. He of the allegations of perving at Shannon.
And still Our Maddie was involved.
Amanda Platell slid her pen between her hands and prayed:
Yet even as we celebrate, we should spare a thought for Gerry and Kate McCann, for whom Shannon’s discovery, wonderful as it is, will be a fresh reminder of their own terrible loss. The return of one lost girl is a marvel. The return of two . . . now that’s a miracle worth praying for.
But let’s not let the miracle cloud our judgement. The Mirror’s Lucy Thornton was at the scene:
I sat with Karen Matthews’ as she struggled to put her anguish into words. Her tears told the true story.
Or, er, not. What is it about Mirror hacks and missing children that makes them look like fools? Anyone heard from Lori Campbell, she who first pointed at innocent Robert Murat and screamed “oddball!”?
Ex copper and electric door salesman John Stalker was less certain.
“Police must seriously examine whether family connivance may be a feature. Large cash rewards are often available for the return of a missing child, such as in the Madeleine McCann inquiry. In Shannon’s case, the money on offer will undoubtedly have tempted some to make fraudulent claims. A shrewd investigator will know that.”
Losing a child is “every parent’s worst nightmare”. Read the book:
Clinical psychologist Paul Gilligan has penned Keeping Your Child Safe, a book that will spread anxiety and must be read ANYONE who genuinely cares about their kids. If you don’t read it, then you only have yourself to blame should something dreadful befall your children.
Case Closed
Then Craig Meehan was arrested. The Guardian delivered a masterclass in reporting. We learnt that Shameless Karen Matthews knew where Shannon was all along.
The Express told of her facing a life sentence in jail.
Still, she could escape her Dewsbury home, which was as the Sun told us: “”Estate is like a nastier Beirut.” But would Karen Matthews survive? A price was now on her head. Fags for murderous lags:
This was underbelly porn. We waited excitedly for the next instalment. It’s all just entertainment.
Payback
Now the papers get payback.
The pick of the bunch is Lucy Thornton, who tells Mirror readers:
“I was with Karen Matthews just an hour before police found her daughter. During Shannon’s 24-day kidnap I had spoken to Karen – always through a fog of cigarette smoke – several times.”
That’s hacks for you. Smokers to a man. And what did Lucy learn from her one-to-ones?
“Dora the explorer was her favourite show.”
Hola Lucy. Mappa! Pista?
And… nothing. Although the Sun’s Alastair Taylor damns her with news that she “NEVER bothered to clean her house or cook proper meals”. And chillingly:
“PROPPED UP baby milk bottles with cushions so kids fed themselves while she watched TV.”
(Take note, tired mums.)
Luckily, there is the judiciary to support investigative reporters like Lucy. Karen Matthews was not tried by media but by in a court of law.
Still now the tabloids can put the boot in on the woman who conned them. The woman who gave them and continues to give them so much to write about.
Maybe they should thank her?
Posted: 5th, December 2008 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (183) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





December 11th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
alright Karen Mathews was tried and found guilty of kidnap etc and to my mind deserves all she gets, but the Mcanns never even got charged with anything, and if nothing else are guilty of gross neglect. Is it because they have the money to buy themselves out of trouble. IIs it one law for the rich and another for the poor…
To say the McCanns are lucky in any way is to miss the glaring point that their daughter is missing. And if it is neglect then it is police matter and not one for us to speculate on…
December 8th, 2008 at 2:43 am
I was checking out where the inspiration for the idea of “Abduction” came from. it always used to be “kidnapped”, Googling the word abduction brings up loads of “Alien” abduction hits, so I can see where Coco’s theory stems from.
Any body from Liverpoool can’t fail to have heard of James Bulger, that is the first real use of the word “Abduction” I can think of related to a toddler being Kidnapped, I wonder if this is the inspiration for the alledged Maddies “abduction” although there doesn’t seem to be any evidence in this case of such an occurance?.
IMO abduction is a fantasy by the way
Alien that is!
December 8th, 2008 at 1:57 am
Karen I know. Spooky!. Even left their watches and phones unattended. Proves how safe and secure they thought they were.
Who could have suspected an abduction by Aliens?
I have to bear in mind that G-Man wants me to know that it was like having dinner in the back garden and I must ask you to do the same Karen.
The Clan are innocent about everything and anything to do with this case. All of them - completely innocent.
It was Aliens that have done for her. It is Aliens what have done her in.
The dogs think that she was done in - and I believe the dogs - But I hope that what they thought they could smell was not blood and cadaverine - but a smell of Aliens.
If Aliens are peeping into Anorak - I would like to ask - Do dead Aliens smell a bit like dead bodies at all?
I think that they must do - because that was all that the dogs could smell - a kind of dead body odour and a kinda blood smell.
Is there any evidence of any kind of abduction yet? Not necessarily an Alien abductor - just any kind of abduction?
Have any top sleuths come up with any ideas about how she could have been abducted?
I bet they fucking haven’t!
December 8th, 2008 at 1:04 am
They’re guilty of leaving the door unlocked. If it had been a laptop that got stolen the insurance wouln’t've paid out…
December 8th, 2008 at 12:21 am
And I am not sure that I will get you all off to sleep at the same time! I will have to make you some hot cocoa
December 8th, 2008 at 12:19 am
Hi Doris! Can’t wait for my book!
Saul! I have missed you - I was going to tuck you up in bed and leave you in a darkened room whilst I went to the bottom of the garden to eat my cheese on toast and drink some booze.
Never mind - I will just have to do it another night. I hope it’s not tomorrow night though because I have got the two-year old twins staying as well! And I am not sure that I
December 7th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
I’ve not been here for a week - and when I come back on I notice that the Arseputin character has still not changed his grundies!
I wonder if this poor chap Arseputin is sat in chains by his lap-top being forced to live in a darkened room without ventilation or proper nourishment. His brain is definitely haddled by this case.
Arseputin - let me know if you ever want to talk about Mo and Moz and Hamed again.
You must be bored stiff chantig the same old mantras like a mong.
December 7th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
once on site there should be details -
December 7th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
Thanks Doris but it just goes straight back to ***edit*** - did you get it from that site earlier?
December 7th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
Montaillou go to website it is there - it was googled 35000000 times before live
December 7th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
Moderator - post edited containing spam
December 7th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Raspy, I’m really concerned that you have got stuck in your groove again, hope it is[n't] too painful - OUCH
December 7th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
Doris I may be stupid but I can’t find it on madeleinefoundation.org, everywhere I find reference to it indicates that it is yet to be published - hints and tips very welcome. x
December 7th, 2008 at 9:02 pm
Excellent, some sense at last,
Guilty of what? After months of speculatiosn still no-one has even established what crime - if any - took place. All we know is that a child is missing. All else is guess work, and much of that libellous
Guilty of what? After months of speculatiosn still no-one has even established what crime - if any - took place. All we know is that a child is missing. All else is guess work, and much of that libellous
December 7th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Montaillou x if you have any problems let me know x
December 7th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Hi Doris, sorry to miss you earlier, I also was just passing through or dipping in and out, left ot go shopping and to eat. I’m now off to get The Book. Thanks for the pointer. xx
December 7th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Splish Splash, I was taking a bath!
Avast there, Anorak holds plank walking event.
Mind the water there Cap’n.
Eeee, youv’e got to laugh.
December 7th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
innocent decent loving parents would gladly take a lie detector test to put an end to the speculation , they would have returned to do a reconstruction and would have insisted on having one ! they wouldnt have left in such a hurry either , speaks volumes
December 7th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
buckets of it !
December 7th, 2008 at 6:36 pm
Anorak appears to edit personal opinion and then states in post 4 that the McCanns are innocent??? This is obviously only opinion with no facts to substantiate abduction.
Not opinion. It’s a fact. Innocence is always presumed. And there is no criem to be guilty of.
And I just love it how the media site all these other cases where either the parents or the last person who claims to have seen the child end up being guilty and yet STILL the obvious is not entertained with these parents? File under whitewash……………
Guilty of what? After months of speculatiosn still no-one has even established what crime - if any - took place. All we know is that a child is missing. All else is guess work, and much of that libellous…
December 7th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
at the moment it is not going to be sold through Amazon , it is definately available and selling fast
December 7th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
HI Montaillou , just flying visit , hope you are well x
December 7th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
Thanks, I had just checked Anazon which is still saying not yet available.
December 7th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Moderator - post edited containing spam
December 7th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Hi Doris - where?
December 7th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
hot off the press -
Moderator - Doris do stop spamming
December 7th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Westboro Baptists?
December 7th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
Yeah, reds under the bed, that could be the answer but in some ways one is more drawn by the Catholic connection - very murky goings on - Opus DEi and all that… but would they abduct a small girl? I don’t think so.
December 7th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
SOLVED.
December 7th, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Did anyone look under the bed? I didn’t see it in the official reports
December 7th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Communists? ie Commies under the bed?