<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russell Brand Strictly Come Dancing Vote Nightmare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html/comment-page-1#comment-403215</link>
		<dc:creator>the watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=197940#comment-403215</guid>
		<description>Russel brand
an unfunny self publicist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russel brand<br />
an unfunny self publicist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html/comment-page-1#comment-402382</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=197940#comment-402382</guid>
		<description>It would have to be a bloody big jewellery box to get thingy into it, and bling is so last year.

I assume that the BBC is holding back on the 'let's execute a contestant' show for just after the Queens's speech...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would have to be a bloody big jewellery box to get thingy into it, and bling is so last year.</p>
<p>I assume that the BBC is holding back on the &#8216;let&#8217;s execute a contestant&#8217; show for just after the Queens&#8217;s speech&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolandcalm</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html/comment-page-1#comment-402370</link>
		<dc:creator>coolandcalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=197940#comment-402370</guid>
		<description>IMO its been fixed from the start for Polly Pocket (Rachel thingy) to win somehow or other.  As soon as she was described as 'perfection'  'as dainty as the ballerina in the jewellery box' I lost interest. If thats what they want then its boring boring boring. 
I never thought Id say it but even Kate Garraway was fun in comparison.  
and why don't they fall over any more?  :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO its been fixed from the start for Polly Pocket (Rachel thingy) to win somehow or other.  As soon as she was described as &#8216;perfection&#8217;  &#8216;as dainty as the ballerina in the jewellery box&#8217; I lost interest. If thats what they want then its boring boring boring.<br />
I never thought Id say it but even Kate Garraway was fun in comparison.<br />
and why don&#8217;t they fall over any more?  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chenier</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/197940/media/russell-brands-sparks-vote-nightmare-on-strictly-come-dancing.html/comment-page-1#comment-402349</link>
		<dc:creator>chenier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=197940#comment-402349</guid>
		<description>Actually, Esther rant continues for several more paragraphs, but I don't blame you for giving up when you did.

There's always next year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Esther rant continues for several more paragraphs, but I don&#8217;t blame you for giving up when you did.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s always next year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
