The Worst Financial Predictions Of 2008: Bush Was Right
PETER Coy “some of the worst predictions” - financial - that were made about 2008.
Of course, everyone who lost money made a bad prediction. But still, the three picks are herunder.
But one of these 10 is plain wrong:
4. “The market is in the process of correcting itself.” — President George W. Bush, in a Mar. 14, 2008 speech
For the rest of the year, the market kept correcting and correcting and correcting.
And Bush was wrong? No, he was right. You’ll miss him when he’s gone.
The rest:
1. “A very powerful and durable rally is in the works. But it may need another couple of days to lift off. Hold the fort and keep the faith!” — Richard Band, editor, Profitable Investing Letter, Mar. 27, 2008
At the time of the prediction, the Dow Jones industrial average was at 12,300. By late December it was at 8,500.
5. “No! No! No! Bear Stearns is not in trouble.” — Jim Cramer, CNBC commentator, Mar. 11, 2008
Five days later, JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM - News) took over Bear Stearns with government help, nearly wiping out shareholders.
9. “In today’s regulatory environment, it’s virtually impossible to violate rules.” — Bernard Madoff, money manager, Oct. 20, 2007
About a year later, Madoff — who once headed the Nasdaq Stock Market — told investigators he had cost his investors $50 billion in an alleged Ponzi scheme.
Ponzi. Madoff. The clues were there…
Posted: 29th, December 2008 | In: Money Comment (1) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- scotfree on Madeleine McCann And The Wanted ‘James Bond’ Spy
- June on Cockermouth In Cumbria: Those Floods In Pictures
- June on Amy Winehouse To Star In New Patridge Family Show
- Anorak on Amy Winehouse To Star In New Patridge Family Show
- Desperate Dan on Amy Winehouse To Star In New Patridge Family Show
December 30th, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Actually, it was kind of fun. Reading the economists’ year end columns, I mean.
A few noble souls have bit the bullet and admitted that their 2008 predictions turned out to be total crap, whilst others have shouldered the burdens of the world, and changed their jobs.
There was much simple pleasure to be derived, for example, from reading John Kemp’s Reuter’s rant on the Fed and its magical bubble machine a couple of weeks ago, secure in the knowledge that John Kemp used to be an economist for RBS Sempra in London, where he was responsible for the company’s forecasts and market analysis on crude oil and products, freight, steel and non-ferrous metals. Indeed, back in August he was helpfully pointing out that “Some people are getting very bullish about lead’s prospects,” though presumably not bullish enough to keep him in the job.
In other words, he knows bugger all about banking, as befits someone who used to work for RBS, but is grappling heroically with the fact that there aren’t much in the way of commodities markets left to work in, much less comment on.
If he’d still been at RBS Sempra he would have had all the thrills of the corporate Christmas knees-up at Madame Tussauds, sorry, private party for staff paid for by the managers out of their own pockets which in no way reflected RBS management’s belief that the taxpayer is just another in the long line of mugs needed to keep them in the style to which they have accustomed themselves.
Instead he poured the agony into a searing condemnation of Greenspan and Bernanke; this is a heart warming story about an economist, and you don’t get many of them to the pound…
http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersComService4/idUSTRE4BG3C920081217