Comments on: Prince Harry, The Paki And The Raghead

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:07:54 +0000

..and war can wait till tomorrow

By: June

June — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:04:07 +0000

Its been the lead on all the news reports today Cheryl, but then the weather has warmed up and the gritting lorries put away…

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:50:17 +0000

Percy, I’m not making excuses for a “Prince” at all, I was talking about a soldier talking amongst his comrades! You ever been around military men and hear how they talk to each other? Percy, but I’ve heard comrades call each other names good naturedly, that we wouldn’t say, and no one took offense. Prince Harry went over to be a soldier NOT a Prince and do you think he insisted men call him Prince Harry - wager you not many addressed him as Prince Harry. He wanted to be one of them — not a Prince just a soldier.

Yes, I am vehemently against racist names used when speaking derogatory and down to a person or about a person in a nasty mean way but that isn’t how the story came across to me in how Prince Harry was talking.

The public and papers couldn’t get charges pressed against Prince Edward for alleged dog cruelty the other week. Now this week is Prince Harry’s turn to be held to the fire for something he said three years ago. Who next? Any worthwhile scandals coming up about the rest of the Royalty we can all stay tuned for?

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:13:22 +0000

Percy Stilton
I am not making excuses for a prince,*** edited speculation***
I am merely observing that all this hoo-hah is total nonsense, retrieved from the closet by the NOTW to sell a few of their firelighters. And three years on it has had the desired effect - on the idiots who have responded to it.
Next week, another royal revelation. —– When he was a baby, Prince Harry shit in his nappy, forcing the immortal and divine and sainted Diana to clean it up and LSO to clean him. Shock ! Horror ! End of civilisation as we know it, and certainly the end of the Royal Family
.
Such is the power of the press !!!

(Just as an aside, do you know anyone who has EVER bought a copy of NOTW. We have all unfortunately read one, once, but who actually BUYS it? )

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:54:47 +0000

..to put it unpolitely…in dog soldier slang…and not to be taken personally…Cheryl & peterMac …You make piss-poor excuses for a prince

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:39:51 +0000

Cheryl…your royal apology is a poor apology for a royal apology

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:21:30 +0000

and I can give you a few reasons why this story has broke in NOWT.. and also as to why now…but I won’t. Needless to say that this will be blown away & brushed under the Axminster just as soon as..

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:18:16 +0000

…and excuses

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:17:42 +0000

Oh Cheryl, what twaddle … I really did expect that outpouring of admiration for the ordinary dog soldier & popular prince that is Harry. ..just not from you. Non of what you have just said is relevant or in context with what said who said what . You are totally out of context.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:56:48 +0000

He said this THREE YEARS AGO and now someone who knew decides to expose it to get publicity for themselves and cause embarrassment for Prince Harry and as much public outcry as they could; the newspapers have to print their self-righteous headlines worldwide; and nation-wide TV stations, I might add, had to have that for their lead story I had to wake up to this morning!

My favourite Royal of all the Royalty who has had the balls to be just an ‘individual’ than any of the others ever had, now getting the piss for being a soldier and talking off handed like any soldier does when among their comrades.

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:49:07 +0000

..anyway now we have finished with Paki…what of the use of Ragheads by Royalty? ..and what of the charming & chivalrous Harry , an officer & a gentleman and a privileged prince to boot, what has 3 years on made of him? or 3 centuries? ….and Ahmed? probably Head of the Ahmed forces by now?…but never a King

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:24:03 +0000

…but not in this context

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:17:31 +0000

..your argument is hardly dis ahming …imho

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:15:50 +0000

…and citing the NOWT in this context is pushing it a bit by anyones standards…its a dirty job but someone has to do it…even 3 news years old is news of the world..happy new year PM may you get a knighthood for your chivalrous defense of Royalty & the word Paki

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:48:12 +0000

Wiki is using the word Paki correctly….now lets see what Wiki has to say about Harry

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:19:51 +0000

Pakistan is a country. It is the homeland of the “Paki” people, a name the founding fathers chose for themselves in 1934, (Wikipedia has a good entry and explanation for people who don’t yet understand), just as Baluchi-stan is the home of the Baluchis, Afghani-stan of the Afghans, Uzbechi-stan of the Uzbechis and so on and boringly on.
To refer to someone as ‘a Pakistani’ is like saying that someone is a Scotland-er, or a Finland-er.

If people wish to take offence at it, then fair enough. Though it is interesting how many of the so called ‘offended’ people are do-gooder Politically Correct thought-police Brits. Black people have changed their preferred offence-word so many times in the last 20 years that we have all lost track. Black, Negro, Negroid, person-of-colour, Afro-caribbean, African-caribbean, IC3, and now back to black again. I suspect that will change again the the next few years.

But a video of something done 3 years ago is really pushing it a bit, even by NOTW standards

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:03:59 +0000

Ahmed & Extremely Dangerous…sorry I could not resist

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:01:48 +0000

I trust that “Ahmed”, which is a good name for a soldier, is a true officer ..and a gentlerman , so he will not take offence and be taking this any further…if he wants to further his career…and curry favour with Royalty

By: Prince Harry

Prince Harry — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:52:29 +0000

Calling someone a brit instead of british could also be offensive.
On the news I have heard several foriegn gentlemen demanding an apology from prince harry, most of them have made derogatory statements regarding his intelligence.
Surely you cannot expect an apology for something with another insult.

By: Percy Stilton

Percy Stilton — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:51:55 +0000

…that is to you Anorak, by the way