Question of the day: Would Jesus spank a child?
QUESTION of the day: Would Jesus spank a child?
If Jesus were married and had children, I think he would have spanked the children.
His own?
The place that I would go to help a person see that he would, when they can’t imagine that he would, is Matthew 5 where he said, “Not a jot nor a tittle will pass away from the Law until all is accomplished.” In other words, all the Law and the Prophets stand until they’re done. And the Law says, “Spare the rod, spoil the child.” That’s a paraphrase. The book of Proverbs says, “If you withhold the rod, you hate your son.” Jesus believed the Bible, and he would have done it…
Spanking Jesus. The priest will see you know…
Posted: 27th, February 2009 | In: Strange But True Comments (8) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- David Jones on I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here Sacks Katie Price
- Dina George on I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here Sacks Katie Price
- Dina George on Katie Price’s Alex Reid In Drunken Fight
- Anorak on Peter Andre Pulled Out Of I’m A Celebrity Not To Do The X Factor
- Wes on James Arthur Ray’s Thought Of Power And Talk Of Death
February 28th, 2009 at 12:54 am
Always going fishing with a gang of mates? Wearing a hoody? Stood around in the kitchen at parties? He sounds like a bit of a lad to me
February 28th, 2009 at 12:49 am
jesus was a gaylord ?
February 28th, 2009 at 12:29 am
Jesus would have been firm with his kids and would have had house rules and kept the kids really busy, taught them well, fed them well, and - well, I don’t know. Did they turn out well? We have never been privvy to that information. Perhaps they revolted and caused trouble. Perhaps they didn’t and went on the have good lives, married and had lots of kiddies…something to think about. The Bible gives no reference to Jesus having married, etc.Maybe it was a secret!
February 28th, 2009 at 12:11 am
O death, where is thy stingalingaling? O grave, where is thy victory?
Chuck Berry Bible, 1 Corinthians xv. 55.
February 27th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
It’s an ecumenical matter
February 27th, 2009 at 7:08 pm
“There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love.” 1 John 4:18
“What do you prefer? Shall I come to you with a whip, or in love and with a gentle spirit?” 1 Corinthians 4:21
“We were gentle among you, like a mother caring for her little children.” 1 Thessalonians 2:7
“Brothers, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore him gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted.” Galatians 6:1,2
“So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.” Matthew 7:12
“If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law.” Galatians 5:18
“You who are trying to be justified by law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.” Galatians 5:4
“I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!” Galatians 2:21
February 27th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
…there’s always a get-out clause with this religion stuff, isn’t there…?
February 27th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
It wouldn’t have been needed. Just as our Lord cured Lazarus of sudden death syndrome and Simeon of persistent onanism on the shores of Galilee, so too would he have been able to drive out the naughtiness within his own kin. Unless of course it is forbidden, then he wouldn’t