
Full Text Of Ahmadinejad Racism Speech To The UN
FULL Text Of Ahmadinejad Racism Speech To The UN:
Part of the Mahmoud Racism Masterclass, Module III.
“Governments must be encouraged and supported in their fights at eradicating this barbaric racism. Efforts must be made to put an end to Zionism…
“Those in authority at the time set off two world wars [were] killing hundred of millions of people and causing mass destruction.
“Those who won [the Second World War], considered that the world was with them [and] set up laws that were oppressive and trampling.
“The Security Council set up after World War II, let’s analyze it. The veto vote - is that equality? Is that justice? Is that equality amongst human beings? Or rather is it arrogance and humiliation? The Security Council must be the most important body for decision-making in order to promote peace. If a law is based on force, how can we secure peace and justice? The seeking of power and arrogance means racism, injustice and occupation.
“As was the case after World War II, armies occupied other territories and people were transferred from territories. In reality, under the pretext of compensating for the evil done in the name of xenophobia, they in fact set up the most violent xenophobes, in Palestine.
“The Security Council made it possible for that illegitimate government to be set up. For 60 years, this government was supported by the world. Many Western countries say they are fighting racism; but in fact support it with occupation, bombings and crimes such as those committed in Gaza. These countries support the criminals…”
Drinks…
Posted: 20th, April 2009 | In: Back pages, Politicians Comments (9) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 22nd, 2009 at 9:12 am
Chenier ..you are so “holier than thou ” that you are almost leaking…I suggest you call in a plumber and get your pipes checked…I happen to know a few Black, Female, Christian, Palestinian Plumbers who might be looking for a bit of work….
just give them a call…you will find them in the Green Pages Directory.
April 22nd, 2009 at 8:48 am
24 hrs on and your erroneous headline still reads the same.
The BBC also felt the need to select (a different set of) quotations: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8008850.stm , but at least had the good grace to make this clear., After all, the selection of quotations is a form of editing, and as such is an attempt at censorship !
But why not publish the full speech ? I was so interested in what you had omitted that I immediately sourced Ahmadinejad’s international speeches from 2005 onwards, and.have concluded that he has many valid points that are worth considering. If others could put their prejudices aside for a while, they might also find that this guy has a valid perspective - regardless of whether you agree with him or not.
Moderator - Anorak satirises the news , he isn’t a news site like the BBC
April 21st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
Anorak begins his text at over half way thru the speech.
You can find the full text here: http://wakeupfromyourslumber.blogspot.com/2009/04/ahmadinejads-speech-at-un-durban-racism.html.
April 21st, 2009 at 1:31 pm
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s does not seem to be so offensive that our so called representative should walk out of such sensitive issue that is affecting the whole world.
talking about racism, enery individual, arms of governments, nations and societies admit racist is a global disease; where total cure could not be achieved, it is essential that the world leaders join hands together and find a lasting strtegies to prevent its promotion and to reduce the harm it causes on people including nation, socienties and individual alike.
walking out as witnessed in this occasion gives us different impressions and interpretations; but most importantly I am not sure weatherthsir actions are meant to represent our interests or mainly based on their personal feelings.
by listening to what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad say it seems as if he wants people to consider the genesis of global racism through which full understanding of the progressive distruction of world unity could be possible and through which strategies towards the global approach could be developed to sonbart the racism plagues. Walking out this type of crucial speach could therefore be interpreted as a reaction (Allergy) to the real “TRUTH”. Even some would interprete the walk-out behavious as act of recism because if it was another country rather than Israel was the target, they may not walk out ot if it was another country representative - say America there may not be any walk out.
I have my lay-man reason for this opinion and that is:
few years ago, American secretary of state (Collin Powell) came with a fabrication whereby accused Iraq of Trorism and presented to the whole world fake evidences that the nation (Iraq) possessed weapons of mass destruction.
The same Security Council did not walk out; rather they listened to him and explore the facts, which resulted to the on going endless war that everyone of us are paying for today.
Comparatively I do not think Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speech is as such fabricative. Then if he is not telling lies, then why can’t the security council stay and explore the facts so that any possible solutions could be reached.
My question:
1) Does walking out really means that nothing like what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said not happen?
2) If it is not, why can’t the confront him for evidence(s)?
3) If it is happening, why can’t they look for the solutions?
All in all, no answer would come out unless they stay, listen and explore the whole issue. OR
Is that where the global racism will be abandoned?
Thanks
A Jimoh
April 21st, 2009 at 12:47 pm
BlackBob asks:
‘Do Israeli arabs get equality?’
No.
On the other hand, neither do black, brown, dubiously converted or female Israelis…
April 21st, 2009 at 11:51 am
Racism cuts both ways, so it’s good to see some dishing out. Do Israeli arabs get equality?
April 21st, 2009 at 10:54 am
No, but there’s enough to get his drift. It gets a little repetitive after the first half hour
April 21st, 2009 at 10:30 am
Your headline states that this is the FULL text of Ahmadinejad’s speech, yet you only display selected quotations. Any reason why ?
April 21st, 2009 at 10:06 am
What is this here?
Does anyone believe this is the full text of the speech?