Anorak | Madeleine McCann’s Kidnapper Calls Police

Madeleine McCann’s Kidnapper Calls Police

by | 1st, May 2009

maddie-fbi TO mark the two-year anniversay of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance, the media is cranking up its coverage. It’s all about the hunt for Our Maddie, isn’t it?

Well, no. After much chatter, lives ruined and censure in the courtroom the single-thread story that spun out of control is once more invites us to watch the parents and speculate.

Sky News : “Madeleine: ‘Major Flaws In Police Probe’”

Madeleine McCann may never be found due to major flaws in the police investigation into her disappearance, according to a leading child protection expert.

Let’s have the facts:

The report claims the police strategy could have led to major evidence being lost


Mark Williams-Thomas, a former police detective, has written a damning report, which highlights several police failings in the hours after Madeleine went missing.

Can this be the same Mark William-Thomas who back in October 2007, opined :

Mark Williams-Thomas, a former Surrey Police child protection officer who worked on the Sarah Payne murder inquiry, says the new approach was ‘textbook’. Says he: “For a long time now the investigation has lacked direction and impetus and [Paulo] Rebelo has brought that back. You wonder why they didn’t bring him in earlier”

Now, with new report to write:

There was no perimeter set up around the crime scene and no immediate search of the surrounding area which could mean vital evidence was lost.

Mr Williams-Thomas is sticking to the facts.

“Crime scene analysis and a finger-tip search would have revealed significant clues. They may not have ended up finding her but these factors would have had a major impact on the situation.”

Whjat is new about this report, other than the date. Much has already been said on the failings of the Portuguese police .

And then the best bit:

“The media plays a significant role because it’s the best way to communicate information to a mass audience. The police rarely solve cases on their own, they rely on public information to piece it together.”

Who knew that after two years of media sensation and the McCanns speaking through a PR , the media had a role to play? And has the medai helped find the child they called “Our Maddie”?

The Sun : “Maddie ‘seized looking for parents’”

Now this is progress. At last a lead. A fact:

MADELEINE McCann was probably abducted as she went looking for her parents, an expert claimed yesterday.

Claimed? What happened to that opening statement of fact?

Criminologist Mark Williams-Thomas said it was unlikely that an abductor entered Maddie’s holiday flat in Praia da Luz, Portugal.

Such are the facts.

Belfast Telegraph : “Questions still unanswered two years after Madeleine’s disappearance”

Two years after Madeleine McCann vanished, the world is hardly any closer to learning the truth about what happened to her on the night of May 3 2007.

But what about what Williams-Thomas just told us?

Despite a massive police investigation that spanned the globe and huge media and public interest, the fate of the little girl who disappeared while on holiday with her family in the Algarve remains unknown.

More facts…

Madeleine’s parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, treat this lack of concrete evidence positively and insist they have not given up hope of finding their daughter alive.

They say they take strength from cases like that of Natascha Kampusch, the Austrian woman who was kidnapped aged 10 and held hostage for eight years before escaping in 2006.

Chat-show host Natascha Kampusch? She went missing in Austria, land of celllars .

This is followed by two paragraphs that highlight those headline-making questions:

As the McCanns mark the sad anniversary of their daughter’s disappearance, to be followed by her sixth birthday nine days later, there are still many unanswered questions.

Such as?

It remains to be seen whether the next 12 months will bring any more answers.

That report was brought to by Maddie Industries keeping hacks in work since 2007!

Sky News Martin Brunt: “A Statement Of The Obvious?”

Madeleine McCann’s parents had nothing to do with her disappearance, she was probably abducted after she left the apartment, the Portuguese police did a poor investigation and the dogs’ evidence was dodgy.

Martin Brunt has the facts:

No, not my conclusions, but those of British criminologist and ex-cop Mark Williams-Thomas.

So the part about Kate and Gerry McCann’s innocence is not your conclusion, Martin?

His findings, on the second anniversay of her disappearance, are based on the translation of 10,000 police documents, including witness statements, DNA reports and photographs.

Findings? Since when is an opinion a “finding”?

He says he was helped in his review by criminal profiler Professor David Wilson and a woman who speaks Portuguese.

Impressed? Hard not to be. Martin Brunt thinks on:

Is this:

a) Critical analysis which “throws new light on the disappearance”, as Mark claims?


b) A statement of the bleedin’ obvious?

Please discuss.

New lows in journalism: Module 546b.

Daily Star

You have already read 1 premium article for free today
Access immediately the premium content with Multipass

Or come back tomorrow

Posted: 1st, May 2009 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, News Comments (41) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink