Comments on: Raymond Hewlett Is Today’s Madeleine McCann Victim

By: The Real Stig

The Real Stig — Tue, 26 May 2009 19:09:38 +0000

I don’t care in the slightest what happens to him or what he is accused of.

Well that’s not entirely true, I do care about what happens to him, and by the sounds of it, he’s in the process of getting some of it.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Tue, 26 May 2009 19:08:56 +0000

Anorak, that same thought has been in my mind on how careful Anorak has been to remind us of what we say about any cases in the UK or people involved. I think those two detectives are doing a great job and on the right track but I’m not convinced he is the right person. However, I do think he can be helpful to them. He is a paedo according to police records thus he then would think like one and hopefully share some ‘knowledge’ of what to look for or maybe he has heard of someone ‘of interest’ the Detectives haven’t run across in their files. The papers keep crucifying that man and he gets legal representation I fear any cooperation or help he could give would not be permitted by his lawyer.

I still say a tight lid needs to be put on this case right now.

By: Anorak

Anorak — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:08:19 +0000

3 - The man has form but that in itself proves nothing. inded, might it even prejudice any case agasint him that he is talked about so in the media? To suspect is one thing - to tell the media and use public opinion as your judge is another…

By: Tweet

Tweet — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:03:29 +0000

Forgive me if I can’t see a convicted paedophile who is wanted for questioning in the England & Ireland as a “victim” of anything.

He’s bloody lucky he managed to abscond from the sex offenders register so long.

By: Maria

Maria — Tue, 26 May 2009 18:03:21 +0000

Totally agree with every word, Cheryl.

The police seem to want to speak to this man anyway, in relation to events which have nothing to do with Madeleine McCann. BUT, in any case, there should be NO publicity. Disgraceful. And counter-productive, in terms of the search for what happened to Madeleine.

It’s grimly amusing that journalists are criticising our politicians for unethical behaviour. Fiddling expenses is not the only serious professional abuse. (Anyway, journos are reputedly not too hot in that respect either!)

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Tue, 26 May 2009 17:47:06 +0000

He is not Madeleine McCann Victim he is the newspapers’ victim. It is time that someone puts a tight ‘lid’ on the ongoing investigation by the two UK Detectives and let them get their job done with no interference nor unwanted publicity. One would think with the expensive lesson the newpapers learned two years ago with printing rumours, innuendos, leaks, all without proof of truth behind them, they wouldn’t be so eager to print hearsay.