America’s Madeleine McCann Turns Up Alive
MADELEINE McCann Watch: Anorak’s at-a-glance look at Madeleine McCann in the news - America’s “Our Maddie” is James Bone Damman, and more jokes…
Daily Record: Exclusive: Chef sacked over claims he told sick Madeleine jokes to diners
Janice Burns has news that Madeleine McCann IS relevant. You know you’re no longer newsworthy when… no-one makes a joke about you.
A CHEF was sacked after shocking diners with a string of sick and racist jokes, his bosses claimed yesterday.
Chef Ramsay?
Pole Lukasz Rzepka, 26, dropped his £3000 unfair dismissal claim yesterday after agreeing a settlement understood to be worth a few hundred pounds at the last minute. He insisted he had not made the jokes alleged about kidnapped youngster Madeleine McCann, the Pope and Muslims.
Our Maddie, the Pope and Muslims. Tsk! So, er, what was the joke, for research purposes, you understand..?
Islay Fraser, 37, who owns the restaurant in Thistle Street in Edinburgh city centre, said she agreed to a payoff to avoid the cost of a tribunal. She added: “I sacked him because he was a disgusting employee whose behaviour was totally unacceptable. He made racist jokes about Islamic people and sick jokes about Madeleine McCann and the Pope. I had to give him a payoff because I couldn’t face going through two or three days of a tribunal and to save the taxpayers a fortune in interpreter.”
Says the chef said:
“These claims that I told sick jokes are total bull****. They are the ones who are racist. I didn’t do or say any of those things.”
But an insider said: “He was spouting offensive, racist, crude and downright sick jokes in the kitchen which were heard by diners.”
Video - NSFW:
Times: America’s Our Maddie – James Bone Damman
Michigan man says he is the boy who vanished in New York 55 years ago Gerry Damman and his wife Jean Damman with daughter Pauline…
The infamous child abduction was the Madeleine McCann case of its day. Steven Damman, a toddler left outside a shop on Long Island for ten minutes by his mother, vanished without trace.
Isn’t Our Maddie the James Bone Damman case of its day? And what about: Madeleine Mcann: Kidnapped American Girl Found In Morocco? Or Caylee Anthony And the ignored black children?
Fifty-five years on, as mysteriously as he disappeared, a man bearing a striking resemblance to the toddler’s father has now come forward saying that he is that missing child.
Police are taking the claim seriously and have ordered DNA tests to confirm the man’s identity.
Says Jerry Damman:
“It’s hopeful. We do not really know too much yet. We would like to find out the answer while we are still alive. It’s been over 50 years. You kind of give up hope after all that time. But it may be something. I’ve known about it for some time.”
The case:
Mrs Damman parked a buggy holding Steven’s seven-month-old sister Pamela outside the Food Fair in East Meadow, Long Island, at about 2:45pm on October 31, 1955, with Steven standing next to it, holding a bag of jelly beans.
“There were three or four other carriages with babies in them outside the store,” she told The Saturday Evening Post a year later. “I told Steven to be good, that Mama would be right back, and went in.
“It was something which I had done a thousand times, and other women still do. It is as common to a housewife as cooking eggs for breakfast.”
She came out ten minutes later to find both the pushchair and her children gone.
Mrs Damman, then 22, told Newsday, the local paper, that her son could not have moved the pushchair alone…
But Steven, who was just two months shy of his third birthday, had vanished with his jelly beans. No one has ever explained why Pamela was left behind.
The jelly beans!
Babble: Man claiming to be kidnapped child appears 55 years later
It was the Madeleine McCann case of its day - The Australian
Madeleine McCann is still missing.
A Joke: Madeleine McCann, The Pope And A Paedophile Are…
Posted: 17th, June 2009 | In: Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (12) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- June on The Pirelli 2010 Calendar In Artful Nudity (NSFW)
- June on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- Tony on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- Cheryl on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- cheekyappleblossom on I’m A Celebrity: Quitter Katie Price Wanted To Die With Jedward
June 20th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
10 Cheryl says:
June 19th, 2009 at 2:07 am
Grand Finale, you said: “security would have stopped her leaving”
However, you failed to carefully read the last couple of paragraphs in the article!
“But Mrs Rawson - who lives in Lincoln with husband Andrew, 28, an RAF serviceman - said it was easy to beat the security system surrounding Ruston Ward where Ethan was treated.
She added: ‘Although there is a door and you are supposed to be buzzed in and out, there are always people holding the door open for you.
‘I had a friend who just told them she had come to see Ethan and she was let in with no security questions. “
***********************************************
A quick search reveals that the facts don’t bear out what is being said. One major point I discovered, is that hospitals are now extremely security concious, leading me to conclude that doctors are USUALLY even more aware of their responsibilities.
June 19th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Margot, have you ever heard that old saying: “There is a fool born every day”. Another version of that saying is: ‘”There is a sucker born every day.”
Stick around you’ll see some living proof of those sayings.
June 19th, 2009 at 2:07 am
Grand Finale, you said: “security would have stopped her leaving”
However, you failed to carefully read the last couple of paragraphs in the article!
“But Mrs Rawson - who lives in Lincoln with husband Andrew, 28, an RAF serviceman - said it was easy to beat the security system surrounding Ruston Ward where Ethan was treated.
She added: ‘Although there is a door and you are supposed to be buzzed in and out, there are always people holding the door open for you.
‘I had a friend who just told them she had come to see Ethan and she was let in with no security questions. “
June 19th, 2009 at 1:45 am
6 Cheryl says:
June 18th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Just saw the attached article in the DailyMail UK. See how easy it is to take a child and if the mother had been in a sound sleep her baby would have been gone.
*****************************************
Not easy at all, the piece you posted states……..
“security would have stopped her leaving”
June 19th, 2009 at 12:17 am
Which one of you believes in the Goncalo Amaral’s documentary posted on youtube and McCannfiles? His whole theory about Maddie?
I don’t. That can not be possible!
June 18th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Grande Finale, that was just the posters’ bible spread across the nets the McCanns cleaned the apartment thoroughly. In fact, one night in absoolute frustration reading the crap that many were theorizing I sarcastically said they have to have used Clorox to clean up and by the next day that was added on a chapter of the bible they spread across the net as bible truth!
June 18th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Just saw the attached article in the DailyMail UK. See how easy it is to take a child and if the mother had been in a sound sleep her baby would have been gone.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193963/Hospital-horror-mother-sees-woman-snatch-newborn-baby.html
June 18th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
HERE YOU GO GUYS - EMAIL FROM OFCOM TO CHANNEL 4!
ENJOY!!!!!!
From: Adam Baxter [mailto:Adam.Baxter@ofcom.org.uk]
Sent: 18 June 2009 14:49
To: Jane Nuttney
Subject: RE: Madeleine was Here tx 7 May 2009
FOR THE ATTENTION OF MARK LAMBERT
Dear Mark,
Thank you for your extensive comments about the above programme.
I am writing to inform you that Ofcom has not upheld the complaints into the above programme. In summary, Ofcom considered that given that this programme was a serious documentary that gave context and sufficient qualifications to any theories it was espousing, Ofcom considered that the programme coverage of the McCanns generally, and the various issues surrounding the abduction theory in particular, did not materially mislead the audience so as to cause harm and offence. As a consequence, the programme was not in breach of Rule 2.2.
Yours sincerely,
Adam
June 18th, 2009 at 3:05 am
3 thatpoorpriest says:
June 17th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
I hope not Cheryl. I keep musing about what I could have done with all the time I’ve spent on this. LOL
*****************************
You might have been thatrichpriest by now
Hell of a cleaner they had in that apartment, she can spring clean my flat anytime
June 17th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
I hope not Cheryl. I keep musing about what I could have done with all the time I’ve spent on this. LOL
June 17th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Who knows, Clive, do you think over the next 55 years that our children and then grandchildren and then great-children will dedicate their time on the internet day and night to solve this case on our behalf?
June 17th, 2009 at 9:07 am
Hope we don not need to wait 55 years to find out what happened to MM