Comments on: Michael Jackson’s Nose Is Missing

By: faye22

faye22 — Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:25:40 +0000

Its a shame I had to read all the rubbish reporting on this site. You are a totally ignorant reporter who thrives in lying. Its a shame reporters like are left to write utter bullshit and make money out of it. You are the people michael Jackson hid away his children’s faces from. In his death you still write lies and rubbish. Next you will be going for his children. You are fell of crap and should be put away in prison for bad reporting. Michael Jackson was everything and had everything that you will never aquire with this your type of reporting. What a shamefull website.

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:34:50 +0000

Dear Percy, sorry! Next time I’ll read more carefully and not ruin your punchlines.

P.S. Enjoyed the woman singer for July 4th but have never heard of her over here.

By: percy

percy — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:54:59 +0000

Dear Cheryl,
You sure know how to spoil a punchline…

By: Cheryl

Cheryl — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:41:18 +0000

Interesting story re NOTW’s interview with Jackson’s former disgruntled employee, who sued him way back when for unlawful dismissal. By any chance, Anorak, were you able to ascertain how many hundreds of thousands of pounds NOTW paid that ex-employee for their story? That is the newspaper that advertises they’ll pay big money for an exclusive story! Debbie Rowe is NOT a surrogate she is the mother under CA law of those two children carried by her and born to her and Michael Jackson during their marriage. Under CA law she will get her children if she files for having them returned to her unless a custody battle ensues and the Jackson’s get down and dirty and come up with hard evidence to try and prove to the Courts she would be an unfit mother. Under the 1993 settlement it is stipulated that neither party can speak of the settlement. The money was put in trust for that young man, at the time, and if he ever speaks publicly about the circumstances surrounding that civil suit he loses what is left. So if he said he lied he loses the money, he says he was tellng the truth he loses the money. One will take note he did not testify at the 2005 case,. In the 2005 case Michael Jackson was acquitted. One can presume the witnesses were lying. Of course, NOTW can pay that young man for his exclusive and one can choose to believe him or not.

News can’t libel the dead. But they sure can FU the minds of his three children who loved him dearly with printing the dirt - all unproven - after his death.

By: Bat E Bird

Bat E Bird — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:59:11 +0000

Bad

By: percy

percy — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:46:08 +0000

“Michael Jackson’s Nose is Missing”……
Really…then how does he smell..?