Pictures Of Alien Spotted At Michael Jackson Funeral
Once they were hidden – now look. Look. Look.
Posted: 9th, July 2009 | In: Celebrities, Key Posts Comments (26) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
Rachel Weisz’s Desire Presents The Laurence Olivier Awards In Pictures
Basil Brush Predicted David Cameron Would Be Tory Leader: Proof
Michelle McGee: The ‘Evil ****’ Home Movie (NSFW Video And Pictures)
In Pictures: The Sainsbury’s Sport Relief Mile Is Golden
In Pictures: Tiger Woods Introduces The England World Cup Sex Doll
Lyndon LaRouche’s Whale Enablers ‘Impeach Obama’
- Tracy Malloy on WWF Mines The Green Gold Rush To The Amazon: Making $60 billion From Fear
- Tracy Malloy on WWF Mines The Green Gold Rush To The Amazon: Making $60 billion From Fear
- abdul haseeb on See The Aga Khan’s Nephew In Chelsea Bareback Whores
- Jade Webster on Michelle McGee: The ‘Evil ****’ Home Movie (NSFW Video And Pictures)
- Jade Webster on Michelle McGee: The ‘Evil ****’ Home Movie (NSFW Video And Pictures)
July 11th, 2009 at 6:09 am
He is not in yet! Coudl it have anything to do with “homicide not being ruled out” the latest news.
July 10th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
I agree with the comment that made Cherl on July 9 at 7:53 p.m. I don’t see what is creepy about Blanket holding a doll resembling his father i fell is sweet. Probably there are kids who wish they could hold a doll resembling a parent who has died. I agree with everything that you have written.
July 10th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
Be interesting to see if Janet’s career picks up after this now she’s the only surviving family member with a career to speak of. Stepping out of her brothers shadow? If she can put that box of donuts down long enough to actually make some music again lol
July 10th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
June, I think the majority of his fans realize there is probably truth to the rumours that have followed him for years but prefer to overlook them and instead focus on his entertainment. Let’s face it, you have ask yourself how many of those fans would have taken their children to Neverland to stay with him after hearing the rumours?
I’ll tell you, you would be surprised at the large number of people who still get outraged if you dare mention you think OJ did kill his wife. You want to talk about a slam dunk case for conviction until the Prosecution screwed it up letting him try that glove on.
I think Michael Jackson’s trial was a slam dunk for conviction until the Prosecution screwed up and put that mother on the stand and the Defense had enough to prove she was a con artist, liar and a few other not nice things.
July 10th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Cheryl
Glad the House of Representatives has a moral ethic then, one hopes also the Vatican can find one..
Strange though isn’t it, just because of being a celeb how people can be overwhelmed to the point of embarrassing idiocy because they could be good with a talent, it automatically is assumed they are wonderful human beings
July 10th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
June, not only has he not been beatified yet; it was announced on the news last night that Resolution to Honour him that had been introduced into the House of Representatives the Congresswoman spoke of at his Memorial Service has been tabled and will not be passed. Too much controversy about him.
July 10th, 2009 at 11:58 am
13 Cheryl says:
July 9th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
There was absolutely nothing wrong or abnormal with the youngest son holding a doll resembling his father.
———————————————————————————————————
Cheryl – did you read that sentance before you posted it? Good grief!
There was nothing about the whole sorry circus that was dignified. A memorial concert in a few months might have been more appropriate and now I read that the girl child is ‘going to record a song for her daddy’… the family are still trying to milk the MJ cash cow….Appalling
July 10th, 2009 at 11:26 am
…he wrote that song – “Beat-It” – didn’t he….??
July 10th, 2009 at 11:00 am
He was beatiful enough already
July 10th, 2009 at 10:23 am
Has he been beatified yet?
July 10th, 2009 at 10:15 am
yes, that’s right – and please don’t shout, that’s very ignorant too….
July 10th, 2009 at 10:13 am
It’s not working. Pray harder
July 10th, 2009 at 9:46 am
I see there are many of you out there who are so immature to waste your time for senseless comments about the memorial service. REMEMBER, YOU WILL REAP WHAT YOU SOW!!!!! RIP MICHAEL JACKSON, SEE YOU IN HEAVEN!!! I pray for the jackson family,peace,and the GOD of all STRENGTH,and COMFORT be always surrouding you,and JESUS shut the mouths of those who are ignorant,HAVE MERCY ON THIER MOUTHS. BLESS MJS CHILDREN ABUNDANTLY AND FILL THEIR EMPTY HEARTS WITH YOUR LOVE,IN JESUS NAME, AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
July 9th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
My presumption from reading all the comments on this one thus far that funerals are much different across the pond than some are over here. I have attended funerals where they celebrate not the death but the life of that person in a Church. Music, speeches, singing, the coffin is in front of the church – opened up for viewing during celebration of that person’s life. In fact I remarked to a friend from that church I sure wish I could have a happy funeral like that when I die! Sure would beat a quiet dignified and religious songs sung funeral.
There is no wrong age for a child to attend a funeral for a parent, grandparent or even a family friend. The only age that interrupts a ceremony is a screaming baby or those still at the age of running around, i.e. 2, 3 year olds.. Those children are 11, 9 and 7 – they should have had the opportunity to attend a Memorial Service in honour of their much loved father. And are certainly more than old enough to understand death.
There was absolutely nothing wrong or abnormal with the youngest son holding a doll resembling his father. What the hell does one find ‘creepy’ about that except to try make it creepy!
From my own personal exerience with Black families and friends I give them far more credit than I do White families when it comes to one of their family dying and them stepping forward and taking in any children left behind. They are very family oriented and more times than not one will find the Black Grandmother raising the grandchildren without a blink or hesitation and the aunts and uncles give a hand in raising them.
Mrs. Jackson has not been in the public eye over the years and I will bet she’d make a wonderful Grandmother in raising those children. However, I’m afraid her age may go against her if it comes to a custody battle if the Courts somehow find Debbie Rowe a fit mother. That woman sold her rights as a mother and sold her children for millions to their father. That agreement may have been ruled illegal a few years ago but that does not negate the fact that woman sold her children for millions. I’m not a fan of Debbie Rowe’s as in my books no decent mother puts a price on her child.
July 9th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
“Michael Jackson’s Father continues to Pimp Out..” is quite an appropriate title for the video. Heavy gold chain around his neck, gold earring on his ear, hat never leaves his head, lives in Las Vegas…
July 9th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
They should have had the private ceremony and burial / cremation at Forest Lawns and then a memorial concert in a few weeks time for the fans.
Singing and grand-standing in fromt of the coffin was too sick.
Apparently they’re now all fighting over the burial place so he’s still not been ‘laid to rest’.
Also I think none of us know the full circs of Debbie Rowe and the children becuase of a gagging order put in place by the Jacksons, at that time the most powerful family in the world almost. Maybe we shouldn’t pre-judge her without knowing the story. (not the National Enquirer version!!)
July 9th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
I think you’re right – it is mournporn and it is sad if someone allows an obsession with a star like MJ to engulf their entire existence – in MJ’s case, he seems to have inspired quite a lot of that kind of adoration and (to us) senseless devotion. which invokes tears, very strong emotions and even – in some sad cases – suicides.
it’s those people who will have gained from the memorial event (erm.. not the suicidal ones, that is….) and hopefully will find a way to be happy in themselves in future, without the need for a fantasy prop to live out their existence.
having never been star-struck myself, I personally find it hard to understand, but what they seem to feel is real enough to them at the time.
however, I do think that such people get taken advantage of in situations like this and it will be interesting to see whether the Jackson family continues to grieve or whether the money machine they now have access to takes over….?
July 9th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
dairy
possibly not, but I still think death and real grief are private affairs of the heart.
An expectation and loss of a series of concerts are really just that, I know people look forward to them, but is their loss so devastating? or is it just mournporn and fairly bleak lives?
July 9th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
Farrah and Natasha didn’t have the same legion of fans as MJ, so the parallel can’t quite be drawn there IMO – there had been such a huge worldwide expectation regarding his forthcoming O2 concerts, it seemed to me that there was subsequently a degree of expectation regarding some sort of public event in memory of him, given that the original assumption of a public funeral and burial at Neverland (and therefore public attendance) was quashed fairly early on.
OTT, tacky, bad taste maybe – we don’t have to like it, but millions will have been moved and got some comfort from it, so for that fact alone, it wasn’t such a bad thing.
July 9th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Cheshire Set
I’ve only watched snippets, most of which Anorak has presented here and some news items too.
I feel the kids were too young for the memorial extravaganza, MJ himself too dead for it and I found the whole thing creepy and in nauseatingly awful bad taste.
It wasn’t paying respects, it was just ostentation in its worst form.
Farrah Fawcett and Natasha Richardson had respects paid to them with dignified out of sight funerals and real grief. This one out -jaded Jade Goody, and I hope its the last.
July 9th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
oh and some of the freaks have children who are named forn example Jermajesty and Royalty!
Social services should be swooping and removing the 3 children before they end up in oxygen tanks and talking to chimps
Struth!
July 9th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
C&C couldnt agree more – the whole family are a bunch of circus freaks…those poor children will either be brought up by an old woman who did a great job rearing the others (not) or a mother who sold them for a house and a fat cheque…what chance do they have
btw – did anyone else find it really creepy that the youngest child was clutching a doll of his ‘father’?
July 9th, 2009 at 10:23 am
Aha. Had noticed the different hand glove wearing. hadn’t thought of them buying in pairs to save cash. VG Yampster! And bulk buying of ties and gum.
Joking aside, did anyone notice how long it took for the posing Janet to notice the little girl clutching at her side, grabbing at her hand, just wanting a cuddle? Janet was too busy grieving theatrically and dabbing away with a pristine white hankie for the cameras.
The whole family is nuts. Barking.. Make the Adams family seem normal.
Apart from the stuff with the children (who MJ had always tried to keep OUT of the spotlight) the whole thing was just tacky beyond tacky! (apart from the replica of the bling-coffin which I’ve ordered and will take pride of place with an MJ doll atop)
July 9th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Did you notice that the brothers had not run to the expense of a pair of gloves each. Some wore the left one of a pair, some the right. Good to see them not being too profligate with Michael’s cash at this early stage.
July 9th, 2009 at 8:58 am
Usher, the youngest brother never sang with any Jackson line up. Bowser, the youngest sister has never appeared in public for some reason
July 9th, 2009 at 8:43 am
Did anyone else think that when the Brothers pushed the coffin down the slope at the end it looked like a scene from ‘Cool Runnings’? One – two – three –
how many Jacksons are there? I counted five brothers and three sisters. Now surely thats not right? could the others not sing or what?